Impact of Primary Care Team Configuration on Access and Quality of Care.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sylvia J Hysong, Kelley Arredondo, Houston F Lester, Richard SoRelle, Trang Pham, Frederick L Oswald, LeChauncy Woodard, Laura A Petersen, Joshua Hamer, Ashley M Hughes
{"title":"Impact of Primary Care Team Configuration on Access and Quality of Care.","authors":"Sylvia J Hysong, Kelley Arredondo, Houston F Lester, Richard SoRelle, Trang Pham, Frederick L Oswald, LeChauncy Woodard, Laura A Petersen, Joshua Hamer, Ashley M Hughes","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09456-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Team-based primary care has become the norm within many large healthcare systems; however, limited guidance exists on how to optimally staff primary care teams in relationship to healthcare.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper examines the associations between variations in team staffing configurations on primary care access and clinical quality.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational study linking national Veterans Health Administration (VHA) data from February 2020 on primary care team staffing configurations to data on access to and quality of care the teams delivered.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We examined data from 22,390 primary care personnel assigned to 7050 teams from 1050 VA Medical Centers and Community-Based Outpatient Clinics across the USA.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>We used data from VHA's Corporate Data Warehouse. We assessed team-based measures of overall adherence to VHA's national guidelines for front-line clinical team staffing based on achievement of recommended staffing configurations in terms of quantity of staff and diversity of professional roles. To measure staffing sufficiency, we integrated total number of team members (team size) with their full-time equivalents (FTEs). To measure role diversity, we assessed deviation from guidelines using network analysis of staffing data. As outcomes, we used three measures of patient access to primary care and four measures of clinical quality that were prioritized by a prior expert panel. We analyzed associations between predictors and outcomes using random intercept multilevel models, with teams nested within healthcare facility.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Variation in team size and FTE reflected lack of adherence to VHA guidelines rather than normal variation. Overall adherence to VHA guidelines was unrelated to access or quality of care delivered. In most cases, teams with higher FTEs exhibited better outcomes. Increased role diversity was associated with decreased secure messaging communication ratios. Teams with more members exhibited improved 2-day post-hospital discharge contact, but reduced access through third next available appointments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary care teams require a minimum amount of FTE staff capacity to deliver high quality and access to healthcare. Future work should examine how these associations vary by specific job role to further optimize staffing configurations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09456-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Team-based primary care has become the norm within many large healthcare systems; however, limited guidance exists on how to optimally staff primary care teams in relationship to healthcare.

Objective: This paper examines the associations between variations in team staffing configurations on primary care access and clinical quality.

Design: Observational study linking national Veterans Health Administration (VHA) data from February 2020 on primary care team staffing configurations to data on access to and quality of care the teams delivered.

Participants: We examined data from 22,390 primary care personnel assigned to 7050 teams from 1050 VA Medical Centers and Community-Based Outpatient Clinics across the USA.

Main measures: We used data from VHA's Corporate Data Warehouse. We assessed team-based measures of overall adherence to VHA's national guidelines for front-line clinical team staffing based on achievement of recommended staffing configurations in terms of quantity of staff and diversity of professional roles. To measure staffing sufficiency, we integrated total number of team members (team size) with their full-time equivalents (FTEs). To measure role diversity, we assessed deviation from guidelines using network analysis of staffing data. As outcomes, we used three measures of patient access to primary care and four measures of clinical quality that were prioritized by a prior expert panel. We analyzed associations between predictors and outcomes using random intercept multilevel models, with teams nested within healthcare facility.

Key results: Variation in team size and FTE reflected lack of adherence to VHA guidelines rather than normal variation. Overall adherence to VHA guidelines was unrelated to access or quality of care delivered. In most cases, teams with higher FTEs exhibited better outcomes. Increased role diversity was associated with decreased secure messaging communication ratios. Teams with more members exhibited improved 2-day post-hospital discharge contact, but reduced access through third next available appointments.

Conclusions: Primary care teams require a minimum amount of FTE staff capacity to deliver high quality and access to healthcare. Future work should examine how these associations vary by specific job role to further optimize staffing configurations.

背景:在许多大型医疗保健系统中,以团队为基础的初级医疗保健已成为常态;然而,关于如何优化初级医疗保健团队人员配置的指导却很有限:本文探讨了团队人员配置的变化与初级医疗服务的获取和临床质量之间的关系:观察性研究:将退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)2020 年 2 月关于初级医疗团队人员配置的全国性数据与团队提供的医疗服务的可及性和质量数据联系起来:我们研究了来自全美 1050 个退伍军人医疗中心和社区门诊诊所的 7050 个团队的 22390 名初级保健人员的数据:我们使用了来自退伍军人事务部企业数据仓库的数据。我们以团队为单位,根据推荐的人员配置在人员数量和专业角色多样性方面的实现情况,评估了对退伍军人事务部一线临床团队人员配备国家指导方针的总体遵守情况。为衡量人员配备是否充足,我们将团队成员总数(团队规模)与其全职同等资历人员(FTEs)进行了整合。为了衡量角色的多样性,我们通过对人员配置数据进行网络分析,对偏离指导方针的情况进行了评估。作为结果,我们采用了患者获得初级医疗服务的三项指标和临床质量的四项指标,这四项指标是由先前的专家小组优先考虑的。我们使用随机截距多层次模型分析了预测因素和结果之间的关联,并将团队嵌套在医疗机构内:主要结果:团队规模和全职员工人数的变化反映了缺乏对 VHA 指南的遵守,而不是正常的变化。对退伍军人事务部指导方针的总体遵守情况与所提供医疗服务的可及性或质量无关。在大多数情况下,全职护理人员较多的团队能取得更好的疗效。角色多样性的增加与安全信息沟通比率的降低有关。成员较多的团队在出院后两天的联系有所改善,但通过第三次预约的机会减少:结论:初级医疗团队需要最低数量的全职员工才能提供高质量的医疗服务。未来的工作应研究这些关联如何因具体工作角色而异,以进一步优化人员配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信