High serum estradiol levels on the day of frozen blastocyst transfer are associated with increased early miscarriage rates in artificial cycles using transdermal estrogens.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Chloé Maignien, Timon Jobin, Mathilde Bourdon, Léa Melka, Louis Marcellin, Christelle Laguillier-Morizot, Ahmed Chargui, Catherine Patrat, Charles Chapron, Pietro Santulli
{"title":"High serum estradiol levels on the day of frozen blastocyst transfer are associated with increased early miscarriage rates in artificial cycles using transdermal estrogens.","authors":"Chloé Maignien, Timon Jobin, Mathilde Bourdon, Léa Melka, Louis Marcellin, Christelle Laguillier-Morizot, Ahmed Chargui, Catherine Patrat, Charles Chapron, Pietro Santulli","doi":"10.1093/humrep/deaf037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study question: </strong>Do serum estradiol (E2) levels on the day of frozen blastocyst transfer (FBT) affect pregnancy outcomes in hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) cycles using transdermal estrogens?</p><p><strong>Summary answer: </strong>E2 levels ≥313 pg/ml on the day of FBT are associated with increased early miscarriage rates (EMRs), but do not significantly impact the live birth rate (LBR).</p><p><strong>What is known already: </strong>E2 plays a crucial role in endometrial receptivity and placentation. The effect of serum E2 levels measured around the time of FBT in HRT cycles remains debated, with some studies indicating a negative impact of high E2 levels and others finding no significant difference. Currently, no studies focus exclusively on HRT cycles using transdermal estrogens, which are considered safer regarding thromboembolic complications.</p><p><strong>Study design, size, duration: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed 2364 patients undergoing HRT-FBT cycles at a university hospital between January 2019 and December 2022. Each patient was included only once during the study period.</p><p><strong>Participants/materials, setting, methods: </strong>The study involved patients undergoing single autologous FBT under HRT with transdermal estrogens and vaginal micronized progesterone. Serum E2 levels were measured in the morning of the FBT at a single laboratory. Primary outcomes included the LBR, with secondary outcomes encompassing clinical pregnancy rates, EMRs, and neonatal outcomes (birth weight and term of delivery). Patients were categorized into three groups based on E2 levels: <25th centile (<122 pg/ml), between 25th and 75th centile (122-312 pg/ml), and >75th centile (≥313 pg/ml), and analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Main results and the role of chance: </strong>Of the 2364 patients, 590 were in the '<122 pg/ml' group, 1184 in the '122-312 pg/ml' group, and 590 in the '≥313 pg/ml' group. The median (interquartile range) E2 level in the entire study population was 195.3 pg/ml (122.1-312.8). The LBRs across the E2 level groups were 33.7%, 31.6%, and 31.0%. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) showed no significant differences in LBR between the '<122 pg/ml' and '≥313 pg/ml' groups compared to the '122-312 pg/ml' reference group (adjusted OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.72-1.14 and 0.9, 95% CI 0.69-1.09, respectively). The EMRs for the groups were 25.5%, 24.6%, and 30.3%, respectively. While crude analysis showed no differences between the groups, the multivariable analysis indicated that the '≥313 pg/ml' group had a significantly higher risk of early miscarriage compared to the reference group (adjusted OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.06-2.18). No significant differences were observed in clinical pregnancy rates or neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Limitations, reasons for caution: </strong>The primary limitation is the study's retrospective design, which introduces risks of selection and confusion bias, although multivariable analysis was employed to mitigate these issues.</p><p><strong>Wider implications of the findings: </strong>Managing high serum E2 levels on the day of the FBT may enhance ART outcomes. Future research should aim to define optimal E2 thresholds for HRT-FBT cycles and develop personalized treatment protocols that account for individual patient variability.</p><p><strong>Study funding/competing interest(s): </strong>No funding was received. The authors have no conflicts of interest.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":13003,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaf037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study question: Do serum estradiol (E2) levels on the day of frozen blastocyst transfer (FBT) affect pregnancy outcomes in hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) cycles using transdermal estrogens?

Summary answer: E2 levels ≥313 pg/ml on the day of FBT are associated with increased early miscarriage rates (EMRs), but do not significantly impact the live birth rate (LBR).

What is known already: E2 plays a crucial role in endometrial receptivity and placentation. The effect of serum E2 levels measured around the time of FBT in HRT cycles remains debated, with some studies indicating a negative impact of high E2 levels and others finding no significant difference. Currently, no studies focus exclusively on HRT cycles using transdermal estrogens, which are considered safer regarding thromboembolic complications.

Study design, size, duration: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 2364 patients undergoing HRT-FBT cycles at a university hospital between January 2019 and December 2022. Each patient was included only once during the study period.

Participants/materials, setting, methods: The study involved patients undergoing single autologous FBT under HRT with transdermal estrogens and vaginal micronized progesterone. Serum E2 levels were measured in the morning of the FBT at a single laboratory. Primary outcomes included the LBR, with secondary outcomes encompassing clinical pregnancy rates, EMRs, and neonatal outcomes (birth weight and term of delivery). Patients were categorized into three groups based on E2 levels: <25th centile (<122 pg/ml), between 25th and 75th centile (122-312 pg/ml), and >75th centile (≥313 pg/ml), and analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.

Main results and the role of chance: Of the 2364 patients, 590 were in the '<122 pg/ml' group, 1184 in the '122-312 pg/ml' group, and 590 in the '≥313 pg/ml' group. The median (interquartile range) E2 level in the entire study population was 195.3 pg/ml (122.1-312.8). The LBRs across the E2 level groups were 33.7%, 31.6%, and 31.0%. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) showed no significant differences in LBR between the '<122 pg/ml' and '≥313 pg/ml' groups compared to the '122-312 pg/ml' reference group (adjusted OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.72-1.14 and 0.9, 95% CI 0.69-1.09, respectively). The EMRs for the groups were 25.5%, 24.6%, and 30.3%, respectively. While crude analysis showed no differences between the groups, the multivariable analysis indicated that the '≥313 pg/ml' group had a significantly higher risk of early miscarriage compared to the reference group (adjusted OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.06-2.18). No significant differences were observed in clinical pregnancy rates or neonatal outcomes.

Limitations, reasons for caution: The primary limitation is the study's retrospective design, which introduces risks of selection and confusion bias, although multivariable analysis was employed to mitigate these issues.

Wider implications of the findings: Managing high serum E2 levels on the day of the FBT may enhance ART outcomes. Future research should aim to define optimal E2 thresholds for HRT-FBT cycles and develop personalized treatment protocols that account for individual patient variability.

Study funding/competing interest(s): No funding was received. The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Trial registration number: N/A.

在使用透皮雌激素的人工周期中,冷冻囊胚移植当天血清雌二醇水平高与早期流产率增加有关。
研究问题:在使用透皮雌激素的激素替代疗法(HRT)周期中,冷冻囊胚移植(FBT)当天的血清雌二醇(E2)水平是否影响妊娠结局?总结性回答:FBT当天E2水平≥313 pg/ml与早期流产率(emr)增加相关,但对活产率(LBR)没有显著影响。已知情况:E2在子宫内膜容受性和胎盘形成中起着至关重要的作用。在激素替代疗法周期中,FBT前后测量的血清E2水平的影响仍然存在争议,一些研究表明高E2水平有负面影响,而另一些研究则没有发现显著差异。目前,没有研究专门关注使用透皮雌激素的HRT周期,透皮雌激素被认为对血栓栓塞并发症更安全。研究设计、规模、持续时间:这项回顾性队列研究分析了2019年1月至2022年12月在某大学医院接受HRT-FBT周期治疗的2364例患者。每位患者在研究期间仅纳入一次。参与者/材料,环境,方法:该研究涉及在HRT下接受单次自体FBT并经皮雌激素和阴道微孕酮的患者。血清E2水平在FBT的早晨在一个单一的实验室测量。主要结局包括LBR,次要结局包括临床妊娠率、emr和新生儿结局(出生体重和分娩期)。根据E2水平将患者分为三组:第75百分位(≥313 pg/ml),并使用单因素和多因素logistic回归模型进行分析。主要结果和偶然性的作用:在2364例患者中,590例处于“局限性,谨慎的原因:主要的局限性是该研究的回顾性设计,这引入了选择和混淆偏差的风险,尽管采用了多变量分析来减轻这些问题。研究结果的更广泛意义:在FBT当天管理高血清E2水平可能会提高ART结果。未来的研究应旨在确定HRT-FBT周期的最佳E2阈值,并制定个性化的治疗方案,以考虑个体患者的差异。研究资助/竞争利益:没有收到资助。作者没有利益冲突。试验注册号:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human reproduction
Human reproduction 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
1369
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Human Reproduction features full-length, peer-reviewed papers reporting original research, concise clinical case reports, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues. Papers published cover the clinical science and medical aspects of reproductive physiology, pathology and endocrinology; including andrology, gonad function, gametogenesis, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, early pregnancy, genetics, genetic diagnosis, oncology, infectious disease, surgery, contraception, infertility treatment, psychology, ethics and social issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信