Leveraging small-sample machine learning for rigorous prediction of JOA recovery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients: insights from imaging parameters and modeling strategies.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Zhangfu Li, Zihe Feng, Honghao Yang, Yong Hai
{"title":"Leveraging small-sample machine learning for rigorous prediction of JOA recovery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients: insights from imaging parameters and modeling strategies.","authors":"Zhangfu Li, Zihe Feng, Honghao Yang, Yong Hai","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08763-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated how machine learning methods can be applied to small sample sizes to enhance prediction of postoperative functional recovery, as measured by the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients undergoing laminoplasty, while leveraging existing research and expert knowledge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 143 CSM patients who underwent laminoplasty were analyzed. Eleven key imaging parameters related to cervical alignment and paravertebral muscles were measured. Multiple machine learning algorithms were evaluated using different feature engineering approaches. Model performance was assessed through repeated random sampling and confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increasing the number of random data splits improved stability of performance metrics. Incorporating fat infiltration parameters enhanced predictive performance. The Gaussian Naive Bayes algorithm achieved the best overall performance, with 76.90% accuracy (65.01-88.78% CI) and 75.24% AUC (59.20-91.28% CI) using the optimal feature set. Logistic regression and support vector machines also performed well. Random forests showed high specificity but low sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that machine learning can effectively predict postoperative outcomes in CSM patients using small samples when combined with expert-informed feature engineering and rigorous evaluation methods. Multiple training iterations and confidence interval reporting enhance result reliability. Machine learning's flexibility in feature selection provides advantages over traditional statistical approaches for such predictive tasks in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08763-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study investigated how machine learning methods can be applied to small sample sizes to enhance prediction of postoperative functional recovery, as measured by the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients undergoing laminoplasty, while leveraging existing research and expert knowledge.

Methods: Data from 143 CSM patients who underwent laminoplasty were analyzed. Eleven key imaging parameters related to cervical alignment and paravertebral muscles were measured. Multiple machine learning algorithms were evaluated using different feature engineering approaches. Model performance was assessed through repeated random sampling and confidence intervals.

Results: Increasing the number of random data splits improved stability of performance metrics. Incorporating fat infiltration parameters enhanced predictive performance. The Gaussian Naive Bayes algorithm achieved the best overall performance, with 76.90% accuracy (65.01-88.78% CI) and 75.24% AUC (59.20-91.28% CI) using the optimal feature set. Logistic regression and support vector machines also performed well. Random forests showed high specificity but low sensitivity.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that machine learning can effectively predict postoperative outcomes in CSM patients using small samples when combined with expert-informed feature engineering and rigorous evaluation methods. Multiple training iterations and confidence interval reporting enhance result reliability. Machine learning's flexibility in feature selection provides advantages over traditional statistical approaches for such predictive tasks in clinical settings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信