Demystifying cognitive bias in the diagnostic process for frontline clinicians and educators; new words for old ideas.

IF 2.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1515/dx-2025-0016
Nicola Cunningham, Helmy Cook, Deborah Leach, Jill Klein, Julia Harrison
{"title":"Demystifying cognitive bias in the diagnostic process for frontline clinicians and educators; new words for old ideas.","authors":"Nicola Cunningham, Helmy Cook, Deborah Leach, Jill Klein, Julia Harrison","doi":"10.1515/dx-2025-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diagnostic error is a pervasive problem in healthcare with approximately one-third of adverse events in hospitals attributed to a failure in the diagnostic process. Cognitive biases are systematic, often unconscious, automatic patterns of thought that sometimes skew thinking and are considered a major contributor to diagnostic error. More than 100 different biases have been described that affect clinical decision-making, and the challenge for educators and clinicians is bringing the conceptual knowledge of cognitive bias to the bedside in an applicable and useful way to mitigate the effects of cognitive bias in diagnosis. The language that is commonly used around cognitive bias is technical in nature, often with complicated and nuanced descriptions, so developing a clear understanding of cognitive bias is a task that needs sophisticated language and memory skills as well as clinical reasoning skills. A novel language approach to learning and talking about biases in medicine is to use idioms, short phrases with a particular meaning that differs from the meaning of each word on their own, to simplify the terminology and improve recognition of cognitive bias at the frontline. We present 'The Idiom's Guide to Cognitive Bias', a Table that lists 21 common cognitive biases in the diagnostic process, and defines each, offering a healthcare example and possible explanation for why each occurs. The benefit of The Guide is its practical approach to reinforcing cognitive and medical concepts through the synergy of language and imagery and to demystify cognitive bias in the diagnostic process.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diagnostic error is a pervasive problem in healthcare with approximately one-third of adverse events in hospitals attributed to a failure in the diagnostic process. Cognitive biases are systematic, often unconscious, automatic patterns of thought that sometimes skew thinking and are considered a major contributor to diagnostic error. More than 100 different biases have been described that affect clinical decision-making, and the challenge for educators and clinicians is bringing the conceptual knowledge of cognitive bias to the bedside in an applicable and useful way to mitigate the effects of cognitive bias in diagnosis. The language that is commonly used around cognitive bias is technical in nature, often with complicated and nuanced descriptions, so developing a clear understanding of cognitive bias is a task that needs sophisticated language and memory skills as well as clinical reasoning skills. A novel language approach to learning and talking about biases in medicine is to use idioms, short phrases with a particular meaning that differs from the meaning of each word on their own, to simplify the terminology and improve recognition of cognitive bias at the frontline. We present 'The Idiom's Guide to Cognitive Bias', a Table that lists 21 common cognitive biases in the diagnostic process, and defines each, offering a healthcare example and possible explanation for why each occurs. The benefit of The Guide is its practical approach to reinforcing cognitive and medical concepts through the synergy of language and imagery and to demystify cognitive bias in the diagnostic process.

为一线临床医生和教育工作者揭开诊断过程中认知偏见的神秘面纱;用新词代替旧思想。
诊断错误是医疗保健中普遍存在的问题,医院中大约三分之一的不良事件归因于诊断过程中的失败。认知偏差是系统的,通常是无意识的,自动的思维模式,有时会扭曲思维,被认为是诊断错误的主要原因。已有超过100种不同的偏见被描述为影响临床决策,教育工作者和临床医生面临的挑战是以一种适用和有用的方式将认知偏见的概念性知识带到床边,以减轻诊断中的认知偏见的影响。通常围绕认知偏见使用的语言本质上是技术性的,通常带有复杂和微妙的描述,因此,对认知偏见进行清晰的理解是一项需要复杂的语言和记忆技能以及临床推理技能的任务。学习和谈论医学偏见的一种新颖的语言方法是使用习语,即具有特定含义的短语,这些短语与每个单词的含义不同,以简化术语并提高一线人员对认知偏见的认识。我们提出了“习语认知偏差指南”,这是一个表,列出了诊断过程中21种常见的认知偏差,并对每种偏差进行了定义,提供了一个医疗保健示例,并可能解释每种偏差发生的原因。《指南》的好处在于,它通过语言和意象的协同作用,切实加强了认知和医学概念,并消除了诊断过程中的认知偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnosis
Diagnosis MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Diagnosis focuses on how diagnosis can be advanced, how it is taught, and how and why it can fail, leading to diagnostic errors. The journal welcomes both fundamental and applied works, improvement initiatives, opinions, and debates to encourage new thinking on improving this critical aspect of healthcare quality.  Topics: -Factors that promote diagnostic quality and safety -Clinical reasoning -Diagnostic errors in medicine -The factors that contribute to diagnostic error: human factors, cognitive issues, and system-related breakdowns -Improving the value of diagnosis – eliminating waste and unnecessary testing -How culture and removing blame promote awareness of diagnostic errors -Training and education related to clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills -Advances in laboratory testing and imaging that improve diagnostic capability -Local, national and international initiatives to reduce diagnostic error
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信