Reproducibility of the Manchester Triage System: a multicentre vignette study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Arian Zaboli, Francesco Brigo, Gabriele Magnarelli, Hugh Gorick, Tiziano Garbin, Patrick Clauser, Serena Sibilio, Gloria Brigiari, Magdalena Massar, Michael Mian, Norbert Pfeifer, Gianni Turcato
{"title":"Reproducibility of the Manchester Triage System: a multicentre vignette study.","authors":"Arian Zaboli, Francesco Brigo, Gabriele Magnarelli, Hugh Gorick, Tiziano Garbin, Patrick Clauser, Serena Sibilio, Gloria Brigiari, Magdalena Massar, Michael Mian, Norbert Pfeifer, Gianni Turcato","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While several studies have evaluated the performance of the Manchester Triage System (MTS), none have specifically examined its accurate application by triage nurses and its association with clinical outcomes. This study focuses on the agreement between nurse-assigned MTS codes and those assigned by an expert group, as well as their ability to predict clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre simulation study was conducted from January to March 2024 across four EDs in Italy employing MTS in clinical practice. Two emergency physicians developed 30 vignettes derived from real clinical cases to encompass diverse triage scenarios and priority codes. An expert MTS group, composed of three experienced nurses, assigned MTS priority codes following the guidelines outlined in the official MTS textbook. Subsequently, the vignettes were presented to triage nurses, who independently assigned MTS codes. Error rate, agreement between nurse-assigned and expert MTS group codes, and the predictive ability for secondary clinical outcomes (mortality within 72 hours, hospitalisation, life-saving intervention, severe condition in the ED and time-dependent pathology) were compared between the MTS priority assigned by the expert MTS group codes and nurse-assigned triage codes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>77 nurses from four EDs participated. The triage code assignment error rate was 28.6% (660/2310). The overall agreement between the triage and expert nurses yielded a Cohen's kappa of 0.59 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.59). Expert MTS group applications performed better compared with nurse-assigned codes in predicting clinical outcomes. The mean error rate per nurse was 30% (9/30). Nurses with more ED experience and triage expertise had higher error rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of MTS using case vignettes was suboptimal in our setting, with more senior nurses having higher error rates. Correct application of MTS better predicted clinical outcomes. It is important to conduct future studies to understand how to best support nursing clinical decision-making in triage.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214213","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While several studies have evaluated the performance of the Manchester Triage System (MTS), none have specifically examined its accurate application by triage nurses and its association with clinical outcomes. This study focuses on the agreement between nurse-assigned MTS codes and those assigned by an expert group, as well as their ability to predict clinical outcomes.

Methods: This multicentre simulation study was conducted from January to March 2024 across four EDs in Italy employing MTS in clinical practice. Two emergency physicians developed 30 vignettes derived from real clinical cases to encompass diverse triage scenarios and priority codes. An expert MTS group, composed of three experienced nurses, assigned MTS priority codes following the guidelines outlined in the official MTS textbook. Subsequently, the vignettes were presented to triage nurses, who independently assigned MTS codes. Error rate, agreement between nurse-assigned and expert MTS group codes, and the predictive ability for secondary clinical outcomes (mortality within 72 hours, hospitalisation, life-saving intervention, severe condition in the ED and time-dependent pathology) were compared between the MTS priority assigned by the expert MTS group codes and nurse-assigned triage codes.

Results: 77 nurses from four EDs participated. The triage code assignment error rate was 28.6% (660/2310). The overall agreement between the triage and expert nurses yielded a Cohen's kappa of 0.59 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.59). Expert MTS group applications performed better compared with nurse-assigned codes in predicting clinical outcomes. The mean error rate per nurse was 30% (9/30). Nurses with more ED experience and triage expertise had higher error rates.

Conclusion: The application of MTS using case vignettes was suboptimal in our setting, with more senior nurses having higher error rates. Correct application of MTS better predicted clinical outcomes. It is important to conduct future studies to understand how to best support nursing clinical decision-making in triage.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信