Preterm Births and Maternal-Fetal Medicine Physician Workforce Location in the United States.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1055/a-2531-2783
Andrea L Greiner, Sina Haeri, Nichole L Nidey
{"title":"Preterm Births and Maternal-Fetal Medicine Physician Workforce Location in the United States.","authors":"Andrea L Greiner, Sina Haeri, Nichole L Nidey","doi":"10.1055/a-2531-2783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Examine for association between geographic disparity in the national maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) physician workforce distribution and preterm birth (PTB) rate in counties without MFM presence.Cohort study of PTBs in the United States from 2015 to 2019, utilizing National Center for Health Statistics natality data. The independent risk factor is the presence of an MFM physician in the county or county equivalent where the pregnant woman resides. Bivariate logistic regression analysis estimated the odds of county-level PTB rates higher than the national average (10.2%, March of Dimes 2019 national data) by MFM physician location.The Northeast, Southeast, and Pacific Coast regions of the United States had the highest density of physician practice locations whereas regions in the Midwest and Western United States had the lowest density. Of the 2,981 counties with PTB rates available, 90.3% (<i>n</i> = 2,691) did not have a practicing MFM physician. U.S. counties without an MFM physician are more likely to have a PTB rate higher than the national average, operating room (OR) = 1.56 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-1.99), compared with a county with at least one MFM physician.Counties with no practicing MFM physician had a 56% increase in the odds of having PTB rates higher than the national average. The lack of proximate high-risk obstetric care is a geographic health disparity associated with PTB. The location of the MFM workforce has implications for both clinical care and health policy. These data suggest that attention should be directed toward where physicians practice and to increase access to care for at-risk pregnant women. · U.S. regions with the highest concentration of MFM physicians remain unchanged from prior publications.. · Only 9.7% of counties reporting PTB data have practicing MFM physicians.. · Counties without an MFM physician have 56% higher odds of exceeding national PTB rates.. · Regional disparities in MFM physician distribution may impact maternal and neonatal outcomes..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"1738-1742"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2531-2783","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Examine for association between geographic disparity in the national maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) physician workforce distribution and preterm birth (PTB) rate in counties without MFM presence.Cohort study of PTBs in the United States from 2015 to 2019, utilizing National Center for Health Statistics natality data. The independent risk factor is the presence of an MFM physician in the county or county equivalent where the pregnant woman resides. Bivariate logistic regression analysis estimated the odds of county-level PTB rates higher than the national average (10.2%, March of Dimes 2019 national data) by MFM physician location.The Northeast, Southeast, and Pacific Coast regions of the United States had the highest density of physician practice locations whereas regions in the Midwest and Western United States had the lowest density. Of the 2,981 counties with PTB rates available, 90.3% (n = 2,691) did not have a practicing MFM physician. U.S. counties without an MFM physician are more likely to have a PTB rate higher than the national average, operating room (OR) = 1.56 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-1.99), compared with a county with at least one MFM physician.Counties with no practicing MFM physician had a 56% increase in the odds of having PTB rates higher than the national average. The lack of proximate high-risk obstetric care is a geographic health disparity associated with PTB. The location of the MFM workforce has implications for both clinical care and health policy. These data suggest that attention should be directed toward where physicians practice and to increase access to care for at-risk pregnant women. · U.S. regions with the highest concentration of MFM physicians remain unchanged from prior publications.. · Only 9.7% of counties reporting PTB data have practicing MFM physicians.. · Counties without an MFM physician have 56% higher odds of exceeding national PTB rates.. · Regional disparities in MFM physician distribution may impact maternal and neonatal outcomes..

早产和母胎医学医师在美国的工作地点。
检查国家母胎医学(MFM)医师劳动力分布的地理差异与没有MFM存在的县的早产(PTB)率之间的关系。利用美国国家卫生统计中心的出生数据,对美国2015年至2019年的pbs进行队列研究。独立风险因素是孕妇所在县或同等县是否有MFM医生。双变量logistic回归分析估计,按MFM医生所在地划分,县级肺结核发病率高于全国平均水平(10.2%,March of Dimes 2019年全国数据)。美国东北部、东南部和太平洋沿岸地区的医师执业地点密度最高,而美国中西部和西部地区的密度最低。在2981个有肺结核发病率的县中,90.3% (n = 2691)没有MFM执业医生。与至少有一名MFM医生的县相比,没有MFM医生的县患PTB的可能性高于全国平均水平,手术室(OR) = 1.56(95%可信区间[CI], 1.22-1.99)。没有MFM执业医生的县患PTB的几率比全国平均水平高56%。缺乏就近高危产科护理是与肺结核相关的地理健康差异。MFM工作人员的位置对临床护理和卫生政策都有影响。这些数据表明,应将注意力集中在医生执业的地方,并增加对高危孕妇的护理。·MFM医生最集中的美国地区与之前的出版物保持不变。·在报告肺结核数据的县中,只有9.7%的县有MFM执业医生。·没有MFM医生的县超过全国PTB发病率的几率高出56%。·MFM医生分布的地区差异可能会影响孕产妇和新生儿的结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信