No significant differences in postoperative clinical outcomes evolution after fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation of the knee between patients with pathological and non-pathological scores regarding anxiety, depression, kinesiophobia and catastrophizing factors

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Pablo Eduardo Gelber, Eduard Ramírez-Bermejo, Anna Castellà-Pujol, Aránzazu Gonzalez-Osuna, Oscar Fariñas
{"title":"No significant differences in postoperative clinical outcomes evolution after fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation of the knee between patients with pathological and non-pathological scores regarding anxiety, depression, kinesiophobia and catastrophizing factors","authors":"Pablo Eduardo Gelber,&nbsp;Eduard Ramírez-Bermejo,&nbsp;Anna Castellà-Pujol,&nbsp;Aránzazu Gonzalez-Osuna,&nbsp;Oscar Fariñas","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to determine the influence of preoperative psychological factors on clinical outcomes of fresh osteochondral allograft (FOCA) transplantation of the knee. The hypothesis was that patients with preoperative pathological scores on psychological factors would show worsen functional outcomes after FOCA transplantation of the knee.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A prospective data collection study was performed from patients undergoing FOCA transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the knee. All patients were followed up for 30 months. Psychological factors of anxiety, depression, kinesiophobia and catastrophizing were assessed by means of self-administered Hospital Anxiety and Depression Subscale (HADS), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) questionnaires one week prior to surgery. Clinical outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 30 months postoperatively using the Kujala score, the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and the Tegner Activity Scale. Participants were classified as pathological or non-pathological scores for each psychological parameter in accordance with the cut-off point proposed by the authors of each questionnaire. The interaction between clinical outcome's evolution and pathological scores was analysed using two-way ANOVA tests with Greenhouse–Geisser correction to avoid non-sphericity errors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-one cases were included (mean age 37.1 years old, 41% female). In the postoperative clinical outcome's evolution, no differences were observed between preoperative pathological and non-pathological scores (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) regarding anxiety, depression, kinesiophobia and catastrophizing factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>No significant differences were observed in the evolution of postoperative clinical outcomes between patients with pathological and non-pathological psychological scores.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level III, case series.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70210","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of preoperative psychological factors on clinical outcomes of fresh osteochondral allograft (FOCA) transplantation of the knee. The hypothesis was that patients with preoperative pathological scores on psychological factors would show worsen functional outcomes after FOCA transplantation of the knee.

Methods

A prospective data collection study was performed from patients undergoing FOCA transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the knee. All patients were followed up for 30 months. Psychological factors of anxiety, depression, kinesiophobia and catastrophizing were assessed by means of self-administered Hospital Anxiety and Depression Subscale (HADS), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) questionnaires one week prior to surgery. Clinical outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 30 months postoperatively using the Kujala score, the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and the Tegner Activity Scale. Participants were classified as pathological or non-pathological scores for each psychological parameter in accordance with the cut-off point proposed by the authors of each questionnaire. The interaction between clinical outcome's evolution and pathological scores was analysed using two-way ANOVA tests with Greenhouse–Geisser correction to avoid non-sphericity errors.

Results

Forty-one cases were included (mean age 37.1 years old, 41% female). In the postoperative clinical outcome's evolution, no differences were observed between preoperative pathological and non-pathological scores (p > 0.05) regarding anxiety, depression, kinesiophobia and catastrophizing factors.

Conclusions

No significant differences were observed in the evolution of postoperative clinical outcomes between patients with pathological and non-pathological psychological scores.

Level of Evidence

Level III, case series.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信