{"title":"On linear equivalence, canonical forms, and digital signatures","authors":"Tung Chou, Edoardo Persichetti, Paolo Santini","doi":"10.1007/s10623-025-01576-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Given two linear codes, the code equivalence problem asks to find an isometry mapping one code into the other. The problem can be described in terms of group actions and, as such, finds a natural application in signatures derived from a Zero-Knowledge Proof system. A recent paper, presented at Asiacrypt 2023, showed how a proof of equivalence can be significantly compressed by describing how the isometry acts only on an information set. Still, the resulting signatures are far from being optimal, as the size for a witness to this relation is still significantly larger than the theoretical lower bound, which is twice the security parameter. In this paper, we fill this gap and propose a new notion of equivalence, which leads to a drastically reduced witness size. For many cases, the resulting size is exactly the optimal one given by the lower bound. We achieve this by introducing the framework of <i>canonical representatives</i>, that is, representatives for classes of codes which are equivalent under some notion of equivalence. We propose new notions of equivalence which encompass and further extend all the existing ones: this allows to identify broader classes of equivalent codes, for which the equivalence can be proved with a very compact witness. We associate these new notions to a specific problem, called Canonical Form Linear Equivalence Problem (CF-LEP), which we show to be as hard as the original one (when random codes are considered), providing reductions in both ways. As an added consequence, this reduction leads to a new solver for the code equivalence problem, which is the fastest solver when the finite field size is large enough. Finally, we show that our framework yields a remarkable reduction in signature size when compared to the LESS submission. Our variant is able to obtain very compact signatures, around 2 KB or less, which are among the smallest in the code-based setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":11130,"journal":{"name":"Designs, Codes and Cryptography","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Designs, Codes and Cryptography","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10623-025-01576-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Given two linear codes, the code equivalence problem asks to find an isometry mapping one code into the other. The problem can be described in terms of group actions and, as such, finds a natural application in signatures derived from a Zero-Knowledge Proof system. A recent paper, presented at Asiacrypt 2023, showed how a proof of equivalence can be significantly compressed by describing how the isometry acts only on an information set. Still, the resulting signatures are far from being optimal, as the size for a witness to this relation is still significantly larger than the theoretical lower bound, which is twice the security parameter. In this paper, we fill this gap and propose a new notion of equivalence, which leads to a drastically reduced witness size. For many cases, the resulting size is exactly the optimal one given by the lower bound. We achieve this by introducing the framework of canonical representatives, that is, representatives for classes of codes which are equivalent under some notion of equivalence. We propose new notions of equivalence which encompass and further extend all the existing ones: this allows to identify broader classes of equivalent codes, for which the equivalence can be proved with a very compact witness. We associate these new notions to a specific problem, called Canonical Form Linear Equivalence Problem (CF-LEP), which we show to be as hard as the original one (when random codes are considered), providing reductions in both ways. As an added consequence, this reduction leads to a new solver for the code equivalence problem, which is the fastest solver when the finite field size is large enough. Finally, we show that our framework yields a remarkable reduction in signature size when compared to the LESS submission. Our variant is able to obtain very compact signatures, around 2 KB or less, which are among the smallest in the code-based setting.
期刊介绍:
Designs, Codes and Cryptography is an archival peer-reviewed technical journal publishing original research papers in the designated areas. There is a great deal of activity in design theory, coding theory and cryptography, including a substantial amount of research which brings together more than one of the subjects. While many journals exist for each of the individual areas, few encourage the interaction of the disciplines.
The journal was founded to meet the needs of mathematicians, engineers and computer scientists working in these areas, whose interests extend beyond the bounds of any one of the individual disciplines. The journal provides a forum for high quality research in its three areas, with papers touching more than one of the areas especially welcome.
The journal also considers high quality submissions in the closely related areas of finite fields and finite geometries, which provide important tools for both the construction and the actual application of designs, codes and cryptographic systems. In particular, it includes (mostly theoretical) papers on computational aspects of finite fields. It also considers topics in sequence design, which frequently admit equivalent formulations in the journal’s main areas.
Designs, Codes and Cryptography is mathematically oriented, emphasizing the algebraic and geometric aspects of the areas it covers. The journal considers high quality papers of both a theoretical and a practical nature, provided they contain a substantial amount of mathematics.