Exploring the perspectives of non-insured individuals utilizing emergency departments in Toronto: a qualitative study.

IF 2.4
CJEM Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1007/s43678-025-00872-y
Colin Siu, Sampreeth Rao, Kate Hayman, Jennifer Hulme, Akm Alamgir, Amy Gajaria
{"title":"Exploring the perspectives of non-insured individuals utilizing emergency departments in Toronto: a qualitative study.","authors":"Colin Siu, Sampreeth Rao, Kate Hayman, Jennifer Hulme, Akm Alamgir, Amy Gajaria","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-00872-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Non-insured individuals face unique challenges when accessing emergency department (ED) care in Canada. This qualitative study explores the firsthand experiences of non-insured patients within the ED to understand how we can improve the system of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This community-based research was conducted in collaboration with a community health center which has multiple service locations in Toronto, Ontario. 24 non-insured participants were recruited using a maximal variation sampling technique for semi-structured individual interviews. Participants must have received care as a patient in an ED in the last 3 years. We analyzed the data using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interview participants felt unwanted and powerless, and faced health system navigation and access challenges. Subthemes include the anxiety of uncertainty regarding how to pay for ED care as well as concerns regarding insurance eligibility, healthcare access points, and language. Non-insured participants experienced stigma and discrimination; delayed care due to a lack of healthcare coverage; and difficulties with the ED registration and triage processes. The study also identified multiple instances where participants had positive experiences with clinicians and devised creative solutions to tackle challenges by engaging informal community networks and self-advocacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ways to improve the ED care of non-insured patients include providing ED care for all regardless of their healthcare coverage status, ameliorating clerical training, outlining clearer policies regarding payments, improving health system navigation, and fostering connections to community organizations. Many of the challenges that non-insured patients face may be applicable to other equity-deserving patient groups. By listening to and learning from the experiences of non-insured patients, a more equitable ED system can be built for this marginalized population.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"356-366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00872-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Non-insured individuals face unique challenges when accessing emergency department (ED) care in Canada. This qualitative study explores the firsthand experiences of non-insured patients within the ED to understand how we can improve the system of care.

Methods: This community-based research was conducted in collaboration with a community health center which has multiple service locations in Toronto, Ontario. 24 non-insured participants were recruited using a maximal variation sampling technique for semi-structured individual interviews. Participants must have received care as a patient in an ED in the last 3 years. We analyzed the data using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework.

Results: Interview participants felt unwanted and powerless, and faced health system navigation and access challenges. Subthemes include the anxiety of uncertainty regarding how to pay for ED care as well as concerns regarding insurance eligibility, healthcare access points, and language. Non-insured participants experienced stigma and discrimination; delayed care due to a lack of healthcare coverage; and difficulties with the ED registration and triage processes. The study also identified multiple instances where participants had positive experiences with clinicians and devised creative solutions to tackle challenges by engaging informal community networks and self-advocacy.

Conclusion: Ways to improve the ED care of non-insured patients include providing ED care for all regardless of their healthcare coverage status, ameliorating clerical training, outlining clearer policies regarding payments, improving health system navigation, and fostering connections to community organizations. Many of the challenges that non-insured patients face may be applicable to other equity-deserving patient groups. By listening to and learning from the experiences of non-insured patients, a more equitable ED system can be built for this marginalized population.

探讨多伦多市非保险个人利用急诊科的观点:一项定性研究。
目的:在加拿大,没有保险的个人在获得急诊科(ED)护理时面临独特的挑战。本定性研究探讨了非保险患者在急诊科的第一手经验,以了解我们如何改善护理系统。方法:本研究与安大略省多伦多市一家拥有多个服务地点的社区卫生中心合作进行,采用半结构化个人访谈的最大变异抽样技术招募了24名未参保的参与者。参与者必须在过去3年内作为病人在急诊科接受过治疗。我们使用Braun和Clarke的主题分析框架来分析数据。结果:受访者感到不受欢迎和无能为力,并面临卫生系统导航和访问的挑战。次要主题包括对如何支付急诊护理费用的不确定性的焦虑,以及对保险资格、医疗保健访问点和语言的担忧。未参保的参与者经历了耻辱和歧视;由于缺乏医疗保险而延误护理;以及急诊科注册和分诊过程中的困难。该研究还确定了多个案例,其中参与者与临床医生有积极的经历,并设计了创造性的解决方案,通过参与非正式社区网络和自我宣传来应对挑战。结论:改善未参保患者的急诊科护理的方法包括:为所有患者提供急诊科护理,无论其医疗保险状况如何;改善文书培训;制定更明确的支付政策;改善卫生系统导航;以及促进与社区组织的联系。未参保患者面临的许多挑战可能适用于其他值得公平对待的患者群体。通过倾听和学习未参保患者的经验,可以为这一边缘化人群建立一个更公平的ED系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信