"Short-segment lumbar fusion" vs."microsurgical bilateral decompression via unilateral approach" after removal of the spinal fixators in patients with adjacent segment disease: Clinical retrospective study.

Turgut Kuytu, Ahmet Karaoğlu
{"title":"\"Short-segment lumbar fusion\" vs.\"microsurgical bilateral decompression via unilateral approach\" after removal of the spinal fixators in patients with adjacent segment disease: Clinical retrospective study.","authors":"Turgut Kuytu, Ahmet Karaoğlu","doi":"10.1016/j.neucie.2025.500654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>In cases where adjacent segment disease (ASD) develops following lumbar fusion surgery, various surgical approaches can be employed. In such cases, removal of the instrumentation can positively impact lumbar pain syndrome. One frequently used method is short-segment fixation-decompression (SSFD). One of minimally invasive methods is microsurgical bilateral decompression via unilateral approach (MBDU). This study aims to determine which method is more effective and safe in cases that developed ASD following fusion surgery by comparing SSFD and MBDU after instrumentation removal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 47 cases treated with SSFD and 29 cases treated with MBDU. The groups were analyzed for gender, age, preoperative symptom duration, duration of hospitalization, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores during the preoperative and postoperative intermittent follow-up periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Duration of hospitalization was higher in the SSFD group compared to the MBDU group (p = <0.001 CI = 56,42-76,24 and 22,04-25,13 respectively), mean transverse canal diameter ratio in the decompressed segment was lower in the SSFD group (p = 0,03 IC = 0,24-0,31 for SSFD y 0,40-0,47 for MBDU), and ODI indices were higher in the SSFD group in all follow-ups (p = <0.001). During the follow-up period, symptomatic ASD was observed in 3 of 47 patients in the SSFD group, whereas no symptomatic ASD was observed in the MBDU group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In selected patients who develop ASD after fusion surgery MBDU after instrumentation removal can be considered as a minimally invasive option that does not exacerbate postoperative lumbar pain syndrome or lead to the development of new ASD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comparison of these two techniques in literature after removal of spinal fixators in lumbar ASD cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":74273,"journal":{"name":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","volume":" ","pages":"500654"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocirugia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucie.2025.500654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: In cases where adjacent segment disease (ASD) develops following lumbar fusion surgery, various surgical approaches can be employed. In such cases, removal of the instrumentation can positively impact lumbar pain syndrome. One frequently used method is short-segment fixation-decompression (SSFD). One of minimally invasive methods is microsurgical bilateral decompression via unilateral approach (MBDU). This study aims to determine which method is more effective and safe in cases that developed ASD following fusion surgery by comparing SSFD and MBDU after instrumentation removal.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 47 cases treated with SSFD and 29 cases treated with MBDU. The groups were analyzed for gender, age, preoperative symptom duration, duration of hospitalization, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores during the preoperative and postoperative intermittent follow-up periods.

Results: Duration of hospitalization was higher in the SSFD group compared to the MBDU group (p = <0.001 CI = 56,42-76,24 and 22,04-25,13 respectively), mean transverse canal diameter ratio in the decompressed segment was lower in the SSFD group (p = 0,03 IC = 0,24-0,31 for SSFD y 0,40-0,47 for MBDU), and ODI indices were higher in the SSFD group in all follow-ups (p = <0.001). During the follow-up period, symptomatic ASD was observed in 3 of 47 patients in the SSFD group, whereas no symptomatic ASD was observed in the MBDU group.

Conclusion: In selected patients who develop ASD after fusion surgery MBDU after instrumentation removal can be considered as a minimally invasive option that does not exacerbate postoperative lumbar pain syndrome or lead to the development of new ASD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comparison of these two techniques in literature after removal of spinal fixators in lumbar ASD cases.

“短节段腰椎融合术”vs。邻节段疾病患者取下脊柱固定架后“单侧入路显微外科双侧减压”的临床回顾性研究。
介绍和目的:在腰椎融合手术后发生邻段疾病(ASD)的病例中,可以采用各种手术入路。在这种情况下,去除内固定可以积极影响腰痛综合征。一种常用的方法是短节段固定减压(SSFD)。经单侧入路显微外科双侧减压(MBDU)是微创方法之一。本研究旨在通过比较去除内固定后SSFD和MBDU,确定哪种方法在融合手术后发生ASD的病例中更有效和安全。方法:回顾性分析47例SSFD和29例MBDU的临床资料。分析各组患者的性别、年龄、术前症状持续时间、住院时间,以及术前和术后间歇随访期间视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评分。结果:与MBDU组相比,SSFD组的住院时间更长(p=结论:在选择的融合手术后发生ASD的患者中,去除内固定后MBDU可以被认为是一种微创选择,不会加重术后腰痛综合征或导致新的ASD的发展。据我们所知,这是文献中首次比较这两种技术在腰椎ASD病例中移除脊柱固定架后的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信