Famke Huizinga, Nico-Derk L Westerink, Annemiek Me Walenkamp, Annette J Berendsen, Mathieu Hg de Greef, Michiel R de Boer, Geertruida H de Bock, Marjolein Y Berger, Daan Brandenbarg
{"title":"Patient outcomes from a physical activity programme for cancer survivors in general practice: an intervention implementation study.","authors":"Famke Huizinga, Nico-Derk L Westerink, Annemiek Me Walenkamp, Annette J Berendsen, Mathieu Hg de Greef, Michiel R de Boer, Geertruida H de Bock, Marjolein Y Berger, Daan Brandenbarg","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity (PA) benefits cancer survivors' health, yet no PA programmes are incorporated in Dutch general practice.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate cancer survivors' outcomes following a PA programme in general practice.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A single-arm PA intervention implementation study among cancer survivors in 15 Dutch general practices.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients aged ≥18 years who completed primary cancer treatment ≥6 months prior were eligible. The 9-month intervention comprised counselling sessions with a primary care practitioner (PCP) aimed at increasing daily PA. Reach, Effectiveness, and Implementation of the RE-AIM framework were evaluated among participants. Primary health outcomes included self-reported symptoms of fatigue, depression, and anxiety; secondary outcomes included step count, caloric expenditure, weight, physical function, self-reported quality of life, and PA. Outcomes were assessed at time (T)<sub>0</sub>-T<sub>3</sub> (0, 3, 6, and 9 months) or at PCPs' sessions S1-S6 (0, 3, 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9 months). Non-participants completed a single baseline questionnaire. The study used (non-)parametric independent tests and linear mixed models for analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 564 invited patients, 149 (26%) participated. Participants had less formal education, higher unemployment, less PA, and more fatigue and psychological symptoms than non-participants. All primary and most secondary health outcomes improved over time, with clinically relevant changes in step count and physical function. In total, 11% (<i>n</i> = 16/149) dropped out before and 26% (<i>n</i> = 35/133) during the programme. Counselling session adherence and PA goal achievement were 98% (<i>n</i> = 647/661) and 73% (<i>n</i> = 81/111), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The programme reached long-term cancer survivors with poorer health status, and showed positive health changes particularly on PA and physical function. Such PA programmes may benefit the health of a rising number of cancer survivors visiting primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":"e366-e374"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12040372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0558","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Physical activity (PA) benefits cancer survivors' health, yet no PA programmes are incorporated in Dutch general practice.
Aim: To evaluate cancer survivors' outcomes following a PA programme in general practice.
Design and setting: A single-arm PA intervention implementation study among cancer survivors in 15 Dutch general practices.
Method: Patients aged ≥18 years who completed primary cancer treatment ≥6 months prior were eligible. The 9-month intervention comprised counselling sessions with a primary care practitioner (PCP) aimed at increasing daily PA. Reach, Effectiveness, and Implementation of the RE-AIM framework were evaluated among participants. Primary health outcomes included self-reported symptoms of fatigue, depression, and anxiety; secondary outcomes included step count, caloric expenditure, weight, physical function, self-reported quality of life, and PA. Outcomes were assessed at time (T)0-T3 (0, 3, 6, and 9 months) or at PCPs' sessions S1-S6 (0, 3, 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9 months). Non-participants completed a single baseline questionnaire. The study used (non-)parametric independent tests and linear mixed models for analyses.
Results: Of 564 invited patients, 149 (26%) participated. Participants had less formal education, higher unemployment, less PA, and more fatigue and psychological symptoms than non-participants. All primary and most secondary health outcomes improved over time, with clinically relevant changes in step count and physical function. In total, 11% (n = 16/149) dropped out before and 26% (n = 35/133) during the programme. Counselling session adherence and PA goal achievement were 98% (n = 647/661) and 73% (n = 81/111), respectively.
Conclusion: The programme reached long-term cancer survivors with poorer health status, and showed positive health changes particularly on PA and physical function. Such PA programmes may benefit the health of a rising number of cancer survivors visiting primary care.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide.
BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.