Patient outcomes from a physical activity programme for cancer survivors in general practice: an intervention implementation study.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2025-05-02 Print Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0558
Famke Huizinga, Nico-Derk L Westerink, Annemiek Me Walenkamp, Annette J Berendsen, Mathieu Hg de Greef, Michiel R de Boer, Geertruida H de Bock, Marjolein Y Berger, Daan Brandenbarg
{"title":"Patient outcomes from a physical activity programme for cancer survivors in general practice: an intervention implementation study.","authors":"Famke Huizinga, Nico-Derk L Westerink, Annemiek Me Walenkamp, Annette J Berendsen, Mathieu Hg de Greef, Michiel R de Boer, Geertruida H de Bock, Marjolein Y Berger, Daan Brandenbarg","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity (PA) benefits cancer survivors' health, yet no PA programmes are incorporated in Dutch general practice.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate cancer survivors' outcomes following a PA programme in general practice.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A single-arm PA intervention implementation study among cancer survivors in 15 Dutch general practices.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients aged ≥18 years who completed primary cancer treatment ≥6 months prior were eligible. The 9-month intervention comprised counselling sessions with a primary care practitioner (PCP) aimed at increasing daily PA. Reach, Effectiveness, and Implementation of the RE-AIM framework were evaluated among participants. Primary health outcomes included self-reported symptoms of fatigue, depression, and anxiety; secondary outcomes included step count, caloric expenditure, weight, physical function, self-reported quality of life, and PA. Outcomes were assessed at time (T)<sub>0</sub>-T<sub>3</sub> (0, 3, 6, and 9 months) or at PCPs' sessions S1-S6 (0, 3, 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9 months). Non-participants completed a single baseline questionnaire. The study used (non-)parametric independent tests and linear mixed models for analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 564 invited patients, 149 (26%) participated. Participants had less formal education, higher unemployment, less PA, and more fatigue and psychological symptoms than non-participants. All primary and most secondary health outcomes improved over time, with clinically relevant changes in step count and physical function. In total, 11% (<i>n</i> = 16/149) dropped out before and 26% (<i>n</i> = 35/133) during the programme. Counselling session adherence and PA goal achievement were 98% (<i>n</i> = 647/661) and 73% (<i>n</i> = 81/111), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The programme reached long-term cancer survivors with poorer health status, and showed positive health changes particularly on PA and physical function. Such PA programmes may benefit the health of a rising number of cancer survivors visiting primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":"e366-e374"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12040372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0558","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physical activity (PA) benefits cancer survivors' health, yet no PA programmes are incorporated in Dutch general practice.

Aim: To evaluate cancer survivors' outcomes following a PA programme in general practice.

Design and setting: A single-arm PA intervention implementation study among cancer survivors in 15 Dutch general practices.

Method: Patients aged ≥18 years who completed primary cancer treatment ≥6 months prior were eligible. The 9-month intervention comprised counselling sessions with a primary care practitioner (PCP) aimed at increasing daily PA. Reach, Effectiveness, and Implementation of the RE-AIM framework were evaluated among participants. Primary health outcomes included self-reported symptoms of fatigue, depression, and anxiety; secondary outcomes included step count, caloric expenditure, weight, physical function, self-reported quality of life, and PA. Outcomes were assessed at time (T)0-T3 (0, 3, 6, and 9 months) or at PCPs' sessions S1-S6 (0, 3, 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9 months). Non-participants completed a single baseline questionnaire. The study used (non-)parametric independent tests and linear mixed models for analyses.

Results: Of 564 invited patients, 149 (26%) participated. Participants had less formal education, higher unemployment, less PA, and more fatigue and psychological symptoms than non-participants. All primary and most secondary health outcomes improved over time, with clinically relevant changes in step count and physical function. In total, 11% (n = 16/149) dropped out before and 26% (n = 35/133) during the programme. Counselling session adherence and PA goal achievement were 98% (n = 647/661) and 73% (n = 81/111), respectively.

Conclusion: The programme reached long-term cancer survivors with poorer health status, and showed positive health changes particularly on PA and physical function. Such PA programmes may benefit the health of a rising number of cancer survivors visiting primary care.

一般实践中癌症幸存者的体育活动计划:评估患者的结果。
体育活动(PA)有益于癌症幸存者的健康,但没有PA项目被纳入一般实践。目的评估一般实践中PA项目的癌症幸存者预后。设计与设置荷兰15家全科医院癌症幸存者单臂PA干预实施研究。方法患者年龄≥18岁,肿瘤治疗后≥6个月。为期9个月的干预包括与初级保健医生(PCP)的咨询会议,旨在增加每日PA。在参与者中评估RE-AIM框架的覆盖范围、有效性和实施情况。主要健康结局包括自我报告的疲劳、抑郁和焦虑症状;次要结果包括步数、热量消耗、体重、身体功能、自我报告的生活质量和PA。在T0-T3(0、3、6和9个月)或pcp阶段S1-S6(0、3、6周、3、6、9个月)评估结果。非参与者完成单一基线问卷。我们使用(非)参数独立检验和线性混合模型进行分析。结果入选患者564例,149例(26%)参与。与非参与者相比,参与者受正规教育程度较低,失业率较高,PA较少,疲劳和心理症状较多。随着时间的推移,所有主要和大多数次要健康结果都有所改善,步数和身体功能的临床相关变化也有所改善。11%的人在此之前辍学,26%的人在项目期间辍学。咨询疗程依从性和PA目标达成率分别为98%和73%。结论:该方案覆盖了健康状况较差的长期癌症幸存者,并显示出积极的健康变化,特别是在PA和身体功能方面。这样的PA项目可能有利于越来越多的癌症幸存者的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信