Patients' perceptions on reasons for self-referring to the emergency department shortly before cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Xavier Bosch, Elisabet Montori-Palacin, Pedro Moreno, Ana-Maria Guio, Alfonso López-Soto
{"title":"Patients' perceptions on reasons for self-referring to the emergency department shortly before cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study.","authors":"Xavier Bosch, Elisabet Montori-Palacin, Pedro Moreno, Ana-Maria Guio, Alfonso López-Soto","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some cancer patients are diagnosed following self-referral to the emergency department (ED), even after consulting primary care (PC). However, the rationale and factors involved in this decision are largely unknown.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore patients' perceptions on reasons for emergency self-referral shortly before cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Qualitative interview study at a high-volume public institution in Barcelona.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured interviews with two patient groups: patients who self-referred as emergencies and never consulted PC (nonconsulters) and patients who self-referred despite consulting PC (consulters). Data were analysed by two independent coders-an emergency and a PC physician-using a codebook approach to thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen nonconsulters and 17 consulters were interviewed. Nonconsulters were more likely to belong to disadvantaged and ethnic communities. There was little variation between patient groups in their experiences and perceptions regarding pain intensity and related distress and ED's advantages in terms of accessibility and convenience. Cancer fear, uncertainty about symptoms, and frustration in accessing PC due to language barriers were unique among nonconsulters, leading to help-seeking delays. Patients' perception of the ED as a facility providing high-quality care and able to meet all medical needs emerged as a distinct theme among consulters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Healthcare organisations and public health services bear the responsibility to promote patient education and improve communication regarding the specific roles and purposes of PC and the ED. Increasing awareness and developing community-based programs that target cancer fear and fatalism may encourage early presentation to PC, especially among underrepresented and ethnic minority groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0355","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Some cancer patients are diagnosed following self-referral to the emergency department (ED), even after consulting primary care (PC). However, the rationale and factors involved in this decision are largely unknown.

Aim: To explore patients' perceptions on reasons for emergency self-referral shortly before cancer diagnosis.

Design and setting: Qualitative interview study at a high-volume public institution in Barcelona.

Method: Semi-structured interviews with two patient groups: patients who self-referred as emergencies and never consulted PC (nonconsulters) and patients who self-referred despite consulting PC (consulters). Data were analysed by two independent coders-an emergency and a PC physician-using a codebook approach to thematic analysis.

Results: Fifteen nonconsulters and 17 consulters were interviewed. Nonconsulters were more likely to belong to disadvantaged and ethnic communities. There was little variation between patient groups in their experiences and perceptions regarding pain intensity and related distress and ED's advantages in terms of accessibility and convenience. Cancer fear, uncertainty about symptoms, and frustration in accessing PC due to language barriers were unique among nonconsulters, leading to help-seeking delays. Patients' perception of the ED as a facility providing high-quality care and able to meet all medical needs emerged as a distinct theme among consulters.

Conclusion: Healthcare organisations and public health services bear the responsibility to promote patient education and improve communication regarding the specific roles and purposes of PC and the ED. Increasing awareness and developing community-based programs that target cancer fear and fatalism may encourage early presentation to PC, especially among underrepresented and ethnic minority groups.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信