Xavier Bosch, Elisabet Montori-Palacin, Pedro Moreno, Ana-Maria Guio, Alfonso López-Soto
{"title":"Patients' perceptions on reasons for self-referring to the emergency department shortly before a cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study.","authors":"Xavier Bosch, Elisabet Montori-Palacin, Pedro Moreno, Ana-Maria Guio, Alfonso López-Soto","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some patients are diagnosed with cancer following self-referral to the emergency department (ED), even after consulting in primary care; however, the rationale and factors involved in the decision to self-refer are largely unknown.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore patients' perceptions on reasons for emergency self-referral shortly before a cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Qualitative interview study at a high-volume public institution in Barcelona.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with two patient groups: patients who self-referred as emergencies and never consulted primary care (non-consulters), and patients who self-referred despite consulting primary care (consulters). Data were analysed by two independent coders - an emergency doctor and a primary care physician - using a codebook approach to thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen non-consulters and 17 consulters were interviewed. Non-consulters were more likely to belong to disadvantaged and minoritised ethnic communities. Reasons why participants self-referred to the ED were categorised under four themes: urgency/distress, advantages of the ED, quality care, and access to primary care. There was little variation between patient groups in their experiences and perceptions regarding pain intensity and related distress, and EDs' advantages in terms of accessibility and convenience. Cancer fear, uncertainty about symptoms, and frustration in accessing primary care due to language barriers were unique among non-consulters, leading to help-seeking delays. Patients' perception of the ED as a facility that provides high-quality care and is able to meet all medical needs emerged as a distinct theme among consulters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Healthcare organisations and public health services bear the responsibility to promote patient education and improve communication regarding the specific roles and purposes of primary care and the ED. Increasing awareness and developing community-based programmes that target cancer fear and fatalism may encourage early presentation to primary care, especially among underrepresented and minoritised ethnic groups.Delete.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":"e695-e702"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12754660/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0355","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Some patients are diagnosed with cancer following self-referral to the emergency department (ED), even after consulting in primary care; however, the rationale and factors involved in the decision to self-refer are largely unknown.
Aim: To explore patients' perceptions on reasons for emergency self-referral shortly before a cancer diagnosis.
Design & setting: Qualitative interview study at a high-volume public institution in Barcelona.
Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with two patient groups: patients who self-referred as emergencies and never consulted primary care (non-consulters), and patients who self-referred despite consulting primary care (consulters). Data were analysed by two independent coders - an emergency doctor and a primary care physician - using a codebook approach to thematic analysis.
Results: Fifteen non-consulters and 17 consulters were interviewed. Non-consulters were more likely to belong to disadvantaged and minoritised ethnic communities. Reasons why participants self-referred to the ED were categorised under four themes: urgency/distress, advantages of the ED, quality care, and access to primary care. There was little variation between patient groups in their experiences and perceptions regarding pain intensity and related distress, and EDs' advantages in terms of accessibility and convenience. Cancer fear, uncertainty about symptoms, and frustration in accessing primary care due to language barriers were unique among non-consulters, leading to help-seeking delays. Patients' perception of the ED as a facility that provides high-quality care and is able to meet all medical needs emerged as a distinct theme among consulters.
Conclusion: Healthcare organisations and public health services bear the responsibility to promote patient education and improve communication regarding the specific roles and purposes of primary care and the ED. Increasing awareness and developing community-based programmes that target cancer fear and fatalism may encourage early presentation to primary care, especially among underrepresented and minoritised ethnic groups.Delete.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide.
BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.