Genetics, primary care records and lifestyle factors for short-term dynamic risk prediction of colorectal cancer: prospective study of asymptomatic and symptomatic UK Biobank participants.

BMJ oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000336
Samantha Ip, Hannah Harrison, Juliet A Usher-Smith, Matthew E Barclay, Jonathan Tyrer, Joe Dennis, Xin Yang, Michael Lush, Cristina Renzi, Nora Pashayan, Spiros Denaxas, Georgios Lyratzopoulos, Antonis C Antoniou, Angela M Wood
{"title":"Genetics, primary care records and lifestyle factors for short-term dynamic risk prediction of colorectal cancer: prospective study of asymptomatic and symptomatic UK Biobank participants.","authors":"Samantha Ip, Hannah Harrison, Juliet A Usher-Smith, Matthew E Barclay, Jonathan Tyrer, Joe Dennis, Xin Yang, Michael Lush, Cristina Renzi, Nora Pashayan, Spiros Denaxas, Georgios Lyratzopoulos, Antonis C Antoniou, Angela M Wood","doi":"10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To quantify the contributions of polygenic scores, primary care records (presenting symptoms, medical history and common blood tests) and lifestyle factors, for short-term risk prediction of colorectal cancer (CRC) in general and symptomatic individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This prospective cohort study used data from the UK Biobank with follow-up until 2018. It included 160 507 participants with linked primary care records and a subcohort of 42 782 participants with recent CRC-related symptoms. The outcome was the first-recorded CRC diagnosis within 2 years. Dynamic risk models with time-varying predictors were derived using a super-landmark framework. Model discrimination was assessed through Harrel's C-index, and predictor contributions to model discrimination were evaluated using inclusion-order-agnostic Shapley values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>C-indices (95% CIs) were 0.73 (0.72 to 0.73) and 0.69 (0.68 to 0.70) for the general and symptomatic participants, respectively. Shapley contributions to model discrimination (95% CIs) were core predictors (eg, age, sex) 33% (25% to 42%) (symptomatic: 34% (9% to 75%)), polygenic scores 16% (8% to 26%) (8% (-21% to 35%)), primary care blood tests 32% (19% to 43%) (41% (16% to 73%)), medical history 11% (4% to 17%) (9% (-25% to 37%)), lifestyle factors 6% (0% to 11%) (-5% (-32% to 13.4%)) and symptoms 3% (-2% to 7%) (13% (-19% to 41%)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Polygenic scores contribute substantially to short-term risk prediction for CRC in both general and symptomatic populations; however, the contribution of information in primary care records (including presenting symptoms, medical history and common blood tests) is greater. Lifestyle factors not routinely collected in primary care contribute minimally.</p>","PeriodicalId":72436,"journal":{"name":"BMJ oncology","volume":"4 1","pages":"e000336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11880779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To quantify the contributions of polygenic scores, primary care records (presenting symptoms, medical history and common blood tests) and lifestyle factors, for short-term risk prediction of colorectal cancer (CRC) in general and symptomatic individuals.

Methods and analysis: This prospective cohort study used data from the UK Biobank with follow-up until 2018. It included 160 507 participants with linked primary care records and a subcohort of 42 782 participants with recent CRC-related symptoms. The outcome was the first-recorded CRC diagnosis within 2 years. Dynamic risk models with time-varying predictors were derived using a super-landmark framework. Model discrimination was assessed through Harrel's C-index, and predictor contributions to model discrimination were evaluated using inclusion-order-agnostic Shapley values.

Results: C-indices (95% CIs) were 0.73 (0.72 to 0.73) and 0.69 (0.68 to 0.70) for the general and symptomatic participants, respectively. Shapley contributions to model discrimination (95% CIs) were core predictors (eg, age, sex) 33% (25% to 42%) (symptomatic: 34% (9% to 75%)), polygenic scores 16% (8% to 26%) (8% (-21% to 35%)), primary care blood tests 32% (19% to 43%) (41% (16% to 73%)), medical history 11% (4% to 17%) (9% (-25% to 37%)), lifestyle factors 6% (0% to 11%) (-5% (-32% to 13.4%)) and symptoms 3% (-2% to 7%) (13% (-19% to 41%)).

Conclusions: Polygenic scores contribute substantially to short-term risk prediction for CRC in both general and symptomatic populations; however, the contribution of information in primary care records (including presenting symptoms, medical history and common blood tests) is greater. Lifestyle factors not routinely collected in primary care contribute minimally.

遗传学、初级保健记录和生活方式因素对结直肠癌短期动态风险预测的影响:英国生物银行无症状和有症状参与者的前瞻性研究
目的:量化多基因评分、初级保健记录(表现症状、病史和常见血液检查)和生活方式因素对一般和有症状个体结肠直肠癌(CRC)短期风险预测的贡献。方法和分析:这项前瞻性队列研究使用了英国生物银行的数据,随访至2018年。该研究包括160 507名具有相关初级保健记录的参与者和42 782名近期出现crc相关症状的参与者。结果是2年内首次记录的CRC诊断。采用超地标框架建立了具有时变预测因子的动态风险模型。通过Harrel's c指数评估模型歧视,并使用包含顺序不可知论的Shapley值评估预测因子对模型歧视的贡献。结果:c -指数(95% ci)为0.73(0.72 ~ 0.73)和0.69(0.68 ~ 0.70)。Shapley对模型歧视(95% ci)的贡献是核心预测因素(如年龄、性别)33%(25%至42%)(症状:34%(9%至75%)),多基因评分16%(8%至26%)(8%(-21%至35%)),初级保健血液检查32%(19%至43%)(41%(16%至73%)),病史11%(4%至17%)(9%(-25%至37%)),生活方式因素6%(0%至11%)(-5%(-32%至13.4%))和症状3%(-2%至7%)(13%(-19%至41%))。结论:多基因评分对一般人群和有症状人群的CRC短期风险预测都有重要贡献;然而,初级保健记录(包括表现症状、病史和普通血液检查)中的信息贡献更大。在初级保健中未常规收集的生活方式因素影响最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信