Examining Trends in Medicare Advantage Plan Disenrollment Associated With Expanded Supplemental Benefit Adoption.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Emma L Tucher, David J Meyers, Amal N Trivedi, Laura M Gottlieb, Kali S Thomas
{"title":"Examining Trends in Medicare Advantage Plan Disenrollment Associated With Expanded Supplemental Benefit Adoption.","authors":"Emma L Tucher, David J Meyers, Amal N Trivedi, Laura M Gottlieb, Kali S Thomas","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between Medicare Advantage (MA) supplemental benefit adoption and plan disenrollment among plans that adopted either the 2019 nonmedical primarily health-related benefits (PHRB) or the 2020 social needs Special Supplemental Benefits for the Chronically Ill (SSBCIs).</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>We linked individual-level Medicare administrative data to publicly available, plan-level MA benefit, enrollment, crosswalk, and penetration files from 2017 to 2021. The PHRB benefits included benefits such as caregiver support, adult day care, in-home support services, and so forth. The SSBCI benefits included benefits such as food and produce, nonmedical transportation, pest control, and so forth. We used a difference-in-differences design studying MA enrollees stratified by Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility status.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>We included individuals from across the 50 United States and DC enrolled in MA plans that adopted a PHRB in 2019 or SSBCI in 2020 and matched comparator plans from the same counties that did not adopt either benefit. Individuals were excluded if they moved, died, or lacked county-level information during the year.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Our sample includes 8,947,810 unique MA enrollees (27.4% in plans that adopted a PHRB and 1.0% in plans that adopted an SSBCI). For dual-eligible enrollees, neither PHRB adoption (0.2%, 95% CI, -2.7%, 2.8%) nor SSBCI adoption (-1.7%, 95% CI, -6.0%, 2.5%) was significantly associated with the rate of plan disenrollment. For Medicare-only enrollees, neither PHRB adoption (-2.6%, 95% CI, -5.9%, 0.7%) nor SSBCI adoption (-5.4%, 95% CI, -15.8%, 5.1%) was significantly associated with the disenrollment rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The promise of these benefits was that MA plans could more directly address enrollees' nonmedical and social needs, leading to better social and health outcomes and reducing costs. We find that adoption did not decrease plan disenrollment, which suggests it may not drive enrollment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14460"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14460","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the association between Medicare Advantage (MA) supplemental benefit adoption and plan disenrollment among plans that adopted either the 2019 nonmedical primarily health-related benefits (PHRB) or the 2020 social needs Special Supplemental Benefits for the Chronically Ill (SSBCIs).

Study setting and design: We linked individual-level Medicare administrative data to publicly available, plan-level MA benefit, enrollment, crosswalk, and penetration files from 2017 to 2021. The PHRB benefits included benefits such as caregiver support, adult day care, in-home support services, and so forth. The SSBCI benefits included benefits such as food and produce, nonmedical transportation, pest control, and so forth. We used a difference-in-differences design studying MA enrollees stratified by Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility status.

Data sources and analytic sample: We included individuals from across the 50 United States and DC enrolled in MA plans that adopted a PHRB in 2019 or SSBCI in 2020 and matched comparator plans from the same counties that did not adopt either benefit. Individuals were excluded if they moved, died, or lacked county-level information during the year.

Principal findings: Our sample includes 8,947,810 unique MA enrollees (27.4% in plans that adopted a PHRB and 1.0% in plans that adopted an SSBCI). For dual-eligible enrollees, neither PHRB adoption (0.2%, 95% CI, -2.7%, 2.8%) nor SSBCI adoption (-1.7%, 95% CI, -6.0%, 2.5%) was significantly associated with the rate of plan disenrollment. For Medicare-only enrollees, neither PHRB adoption (-2.6%, 95% CI, -5.9%, 0.7%) nor SSBCI adoption (-5.4%, 95% CI, -15.8%, 5.1%) was significantly associated with the disenrollment rate.

Conclusion: The promise of these benefits was that MA plans could more directly address enrollees' nonmedical and social needs, leading to better social and health outcomes and reducing costs. We find that adoption did not decrease plan disenrollment, which suggests it may not drive enrollment decisions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信