Psychometric Testing of the Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale Version 3.0 in Thai Patients With Heart Disease.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Chidchanog Mayurapak, Chonchanok Bunsuk, Jom Suwanno, Naruebeth Koson, Wanna Kumanjan, Chennet Phonphet, Ladda Thiamwong
{"title":"Psychometric Testing of the Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale Version 3.0 in Thai Patients With Heart Disease.","authors":"Chidchanog Mayurapak, Chonchanok Bunsuk, Jom Suwanno, Naruebeth Koson, Wanna Kumanjan, Chennet Phonphet, Ladda Thiamwong","doi":"10.1097/JCN.0000000000001189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale version 3.0 (SCSES-v3.0) measures self-efficacy in various chronic conditions. However, its psychometric properties in specific conditions and non-Western contexts are not well understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated the psychometric properties of the Thai version of the SCSES-v3.0 in patients with heart disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional methodological study, we recruited patients with heart disease from 2 hospitals and 15 primary care settings. We evaluated structural validity using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and hypothesis testing against the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory version 4.c (SC-CII-v4.c). Reliability was assessed using McDonald's ω , Cronbach α , intraclass correlation coefficients, and measurement errors were calculated for score precision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 300 patients, 287 were included in the analysis after excluding outliers. Exploratory factor analysis conducted with the first split-half subsample revealed a 2-factor structure: one factor represented self-efficacy in maintenance and monitoring behaviors (items 1-5), and the other represented self-efficacy in management behaviors (items 6-10). Confirmatory factor analysis conducted with the second split-half subsample and the overall sample confirmed the scale's bidimensional model with high factor loadings. The dimensions and overall SCSES-v3.0 positively correlated with each scale and the overall SC-CII-v4.c. Reliability was excellent for internal consistency (range, 0.91-0.94) and test-retest reliability (range, 0.95-0.97). The measurement error results were satisfactory.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SCSES-v3.0 demonstrated robust psychometric characteristics. Its validity and reliability make it a valuable instrument for clinical practice and research with the potential to enhance patient outcomes in heart disease management.</p>","PeriodicalId":54868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000001189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale version 3.0 (SCSES-v3.0) measures self-efficacy in various chronic conditions. However, its psychometric properties in specific conditions and non-Western contexts are not well understood.

Objective: We evaluated the psychometric properties of the Thai version of the SCSES-v3.0 in patients with heart disease.

Methods: In this cross-sectional methodological study, we recruited patients with heart disease from 2 hospitals and 15 primary care settings. We evaluated structural validity using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and hypothesis testing against the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory version 4.c (SC-CII-v4.c). Reliability was assessed using McDonald's ω , Cronbach α , intraclass correlation coefficients, and measurement errors were calculated for score precision.

Results: Of 300 patients, 287 were included in the analysis after excluding outliers. Exploratory factor analysis conducted with the first split-half subsample revealed a 2-factor structure: one factor represented self-efficacy in maintenance and monitoring behaviors (items 1-5), and the other represented self-efficacy in management behaviors (items 6-10). Confirmatory factor analysis conducted with the second split-half subsample and the overall sample confirmed the scale's bidimensional model with high factor loadings. The dimensions and overall SCSES-v3.0 positively correlated with each scale and the overall SC-CII-v4.c. Reliability was excellent for internal consistency (range, 0.91-0.94) and test-retest reliability (range, 0.95-0.97). The measurement error results were satisfactory.

Conclusions: The SCSES-v3.0 demonstrated robust psychometric characteristics. Its validity and reliability make it a valuable instrument for clinical practice and research with the potential to enhance patient outcomes in heart disease management.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Official journal of the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing is one of the leading journals for advanced practice nurses in cardiovascular care, providing thorough coverage of timely topics and information that is extremely practical for daily, on-the-job use. Each issue addresses the physiologic, psychologic, and social needs of cardiovascular patients and their families in a variety of environments. Regular columns include By the Bedside, Progress in Prevention, Pharmacology, Dysrhythmias, and Outcomes Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信