Manchester Triage System as a Predictive Model for Early Placement of Peripheral Venous Catheters in a Pediatric Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Antonio Esteve-Ríos PhD, MSN, RN, Arturo Garcia-Garcia MSN, RN, Sofía García-Sanjuán PhD, MSN, RN, Irene Amorós-Vicente MSN, RN, Salima Serna-Martín MSN, RN, Jaime Falcó-Martínez MSN, RN, David Monasor-Ortolá MSN, RN
{"title":"Manchester Triage System as a Predictive Model for Early Placement of Peripheral Venous Catheters in a Pediatric Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Antonio Esteve-Ríos PhD, MSN, RN,&nbsp;Arturo Garcia-Garcia MSN, RN,&nbsp;Sofía García-Sanjuán PhD, MSN, RN,&nbsp;Irene Amorós-Vicente MSN, RN,&nbsp;Salima Serna-Martín MSN, RN,&nbsp;Jaime Falcó-Martínez MSN, RN,&nbsp;David Monasor-Ortolá MSN, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Peripheral venous catheterization is a frequent procedure in pediatric emergency departments. However, a substantial percentage of these catheters remain unused and triage systems could potentially predict catheter utilization. Therefore, this study aimed to correlate the utilization of pediatric peripheral venous catheters with the reason for consultation and the priority level assigned according to the Manchester triage system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in the emergency department of Vinalopó University Hospital, Elche, Spain. Medical records of patients aged 0 to 14 from 2010 to March 2024 were analyzed. The study included children who had a peripheral venous catheter placed during their stay in the department.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In 45% of the cases, the peripheral venous catheter was not used after placement. Significant relationships were identified between the reason for consultation and the priority level with catheter utilization (<em>P</em>&lt;.001). Catheters were most frequently used in children presenting with “vomiting” (73.9%), “abdominal pain in children” (62%), and “limb problems” (59.1%). Regarding priority, catheters were more commonly used in children triaged as yellow (urgent priority) (56.2%).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Nearly half of the peripheral venous catheters placed in pediatric emergency services may remain unused. Nevertheless, they are more frequently used in children triaged for the consultation reasons of “vomiting,” “abdominal pain in children,” and “limb problems” and those assigned a yellow priority.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":"51 4","pages":"Pages 742-748"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099176725000571","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Peripheral venous catheterization is a frequent procedure in pediatric emergency departments. However, a substantial percentage of these catheters remain unused and triage systems could potentially predict catheter utilization. Therefore, this study aimed to correlate the utilization of pediatric peripheral venous catheters with the reason for consultation and the priority level assigned according to the Manchester triage system.

Methods

A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in the emergency department of Vinalopó University Hospital, Elche, Spain. Medical records of patients aged 0 to 14 from 2010 to March 2024 were analyzed. The study included children who had a peripheral venous catheter placed during their stay in the department.

Results

In 45% of the cases, the peripheral venous catheter was not used after placement. Significant relationships were identified between the reason for consultation and the priority level with catheter utilization (P<.001). Catheters were most frequently used in children presenting with “vomiting” (73.9%), “abdominal pain in children” (62%), and “limb problems” (59.1%). Regarding priority, catheters were more commonly used in children triaged as yellow (urgent priority) (56.2%).

Discussion

Nearly half of the peripheral venous catheters placed in pediatric emergency services may remain unused. Nevertheless, they are more frequently used in children triaged for the consultation reasons of “vomiting,” “abdominal pain in children,” and “limb problems” and those assigned a yellow priority.
曼彻斯特分诊系统作为儿科急诊室早期置入外周静脉导管的预测模型:一项横断面研究
简介:外周静脉置管是儿科急诊科常见的手术。然而,这些导管的相当大比例仍然未使用,分诊系统可以潜在地预测导管的使用。因此,本研究旨在将儿童外周静脉导管的使用与咨询原因和根据曼彻斯特分诊系统分配的优先级别联系起来。方法:在西班牙埃尔切Vinalopó大学医院急诊科进行横断面描述性研究。对2010年至2024年3月0 ~ 14岁患者的病历进行分析。该研究包括在住院期间放置外周静脉导管的儿童。结果:45%的患者置管后未使用外周静脉导管。咨询原因与导管使用的优先级之间存在显著关系(p讨论:在儿科急诊服务中放置的近一半外周静脉导管可能仍未使用。然而,它们更常用于因“呕吐”、“儿童腹痛”和“肢体问题”等咨询原因而被分类的儿童,以及那些被分配为黄色优先级的儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信