Can we avoid casting for suspected scaphoid fractures? A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Abigael Cohen, Max Reijman, Gerald A Kraan, Sara J Baart, Jan A N Verhaar, Joost W Colaris
{"title":"Can we avoid casting for suspected scaphoid fractures? A multicenter randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Abigael Cohen, Max Reijman, Gerald A Kraan, Sara J Baart, Jan A N Verhaar, Joost W Colaris","doi":"10.1186/s10195-025-00822-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In suspected scaphoid fractures with normal initial radiographs, the usual care is casting, but only 10% of patients have scaphoid fractures. To reduce overtreatment, we evaluated whether bandaging, instead of casting, resulted in noninferior functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We included adults with suspected scaphoid fractures and normal initial radiographs at the emergency department in our multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized to 3-day bandaging or 2-week casting. Questionnaires, physical examination, and radiographs were performed at 2 weeks and 1 year. Additional questionnaires were sent after inclusion, 6 weeks, and 3 months. Our primary outcome was the adjusted estimated difference between groups of the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH) score at 3 months (natural logarithm of the margin of noninferiority = 2.0). Secondary outcomes included the QDASH score, Patient-Rated Hand/Wrist Evaluation Score, visual analog scale pain, wrist range of motion, patient satisfaction, and complications during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 180 patients (91 bandaging and 89 casting), 16 had scaphoid fractures and there were no scaphoid nonunions. Functional outcome in the bandaging group was noninferior at 3 months compared with the casting group [adjusted estimated difference QDASH score 0.30 (95% CI 0.02-0.62)]. All other patient-reported function and pain scores were not significantly different between groups. Range of motion at 2 weeks was better in the bandaging group, and they were more satisfied with the treatment than the casting group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Casting for suspected scaphoid fractures but normal initial radiographs can be avoided because bandaging seems to be an alternative treatment option when patients are reevaluated after 2 weeks. Level of evidence Level II. Trial registration Trial registered at the Trialregister on 2018-02-28 on www.trialregister.nl , NTR7164.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"26 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-025-00822-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In suspected scaphoid fractures with normal initial radiographs, the usual care is casting, but only 10% of patients have scaphoid fractures. To reduce overtreatment, we evaluated whether bandaging, instead of casting, resulted in noninferior functional outcomes.

Patients and methods: We included adults with suspected scaphoid fractures and normal initial radiographs at the emergency department in our multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized to 3-day bandaging or 2-week casting. Questionnaires, physical examination, and radiographs were performed at 2 weeks and 1 year. Additional questionnaires were sent after inclusion, 6 weeks, and 3 months. Our primary outcome was the adjusted estimated difference between groups of the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH) score at 3 months (natural logarithm of the margin of noninferiority = 2.0). Secondary outcomes included the QDASH score, Patient-Rated Hand/Wrist Evaluation Score, visual analog scale pain, wrist range of motion, patient satisfaction, and complications during follow-up.

Results: Of the 180 patients (91 bandaging and 89 casting), 16 had scaphoid fractures and there were no scaphoid nonunions. Functional outcome in the bandaging group was noninferior at 3 months compared with the casting group [adjusted estimated difference QDASH score 0.30 (95% CI 0.02-0.62)]. All other patient-reported function and pain scores were not significantly different between groups. Range of motion at 2 weeks was better in the bandaging group, and they were more satisfied with the treatment than the casting group.

Conclusions: Casting for suspected scaphoid fractures but normal initial radiographs can be avoided because bandaging seems to be an alternative treatment option when patients are reevaluated after 2 weeks. Level of evidence Level II. Trial registration Trial registered at the Trialregister on 2018-02-28 on www.trialregister.nl , NTR7164.

疑似舟状骨骨折可以避免铸造吗?一项多中心随机对照试验。
背景:在初始x线片正常的疑似舟状骨骨折中,通常的治疗是铸造,但只有10%的患者发生舟状骨骨折。为了减少过度治疗,我们评估了包扎而不是铸造是否能产生良好的功能结果。患者和方法:在我们的多中心随机对照试验中,我们纳入了急诊部疑似舟状骨骨折且初始x线片正常的成年人。患者随机分为3天包扎组和2周石膏组。分别于2周和1年进行问卷调查、体格检查和x线片检查。在纳入、6周和3个月后发送额外的问卷。我们的主要结局是各组在3个月时手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾(QDASH)评分的调整估计差异(非劣效性边际的自然对数= 2.0)。次要结局包括QDASH评分、患者评定的手/手腕评估评分、视觉模拟量表疼痛、手腕活动范围、患者满意度和随访期间的并发症。结果:180例患者中(包扎91例,铸造89例),舟骨骨折16例,无舟骨不连。3个月时,绷带组的功能结局与铸造组相比并不差[调整后的估计差QDASH评分0.30 (95% CI 0.02-0.62)]。所有其他患者报告的功能和疼痛评分在两组之间没有显著差异。绷带组2周时活动范围较石膏组好,对治疗的满意度较石膏组高。结论:对于疑似舟状骨骨折但初始x线片正常的患者,可以避免铸造,因为当患者在2周后重新评估时,绷带似乎是另一种治疗选择。证据等级二级。在Trialregister (2018-02-28, www.trialregister.nl, NTR7164)注册试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, the official open access peer-reviewed journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, publishes original papers reporting basic or clinical research in the field of orthopaedic and traumatologic surgery, as well as systematic reviews, brief communications, case reports and letters to the Editor. Narrative instructional reviews and commentaries to original articles may be commissioned by Editors from eminent colleagues. The Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology aims to be an international forum for the communication and exchange of ideas concerning the various aspects of orthopaedics and musculoskeletal trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信