Post-esophagectomy hiatal hernia following minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Thitiporn Chobarporn, Alia P Qureshi, John G Hunter, Stephanie G Wood
{"title":"Post-esophagectomy hiatal hernia following minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients.","authors":"Thitiporn Chobarporn, Alia P Qureshi, John G Hunter, Stephanie G Wood","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11639-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has emerged as the preferred surgical method for esophageal cancer resulting from lower morbidity rates for MIE compared to open surgery. However, post-esophagectomy hiatal hernia (PEHH), also known as paraconduit hernia, once rare, is now increasingly observed as a late complication. This study aims to ascertain the prevalence, predictive factors, and surgical management of PEHH following MIE in esophageal cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed esophageal cancer patients who underwent MIE between 2013 and 2023. Patients with PEHH were identified through clinical presentation and CT scans and compared to those without PEHH using statistical tests. Variables with p-values less than 0.2 were subjected to multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 371 patients, predominantly male with locally advanced disease (stages 2-4, 90.8%), 25 (6.7%) developed PEHH after a median interval of 24 months post-MIE. The PEHH group exhibited significantly lower BMI and shorter ICU stays. On multivariate analysis BMI < 25 kg/m2 (OR 2.96, CI 1.22-7.20, p = 0.02) and ICU stays (OR 0.67, CI 0.47-0.96, p = 0.03) were independent predictors of PEHH. Surgical repair was performed in 84% of PEHH cases, with 60% symptomatic and 48% emergency surgery. The minimally invasive approach was implemented in 15 patients (71.4%). Primary repair was successfully conducted in 14 cases (66.7%), while mesh was used in one-third of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The increasing prevalence of PEHH with MIE warrants attention. A lower BMI and shorter ICU stay was associated with PEHH. Most cases are symptomatic and effectively managed through minimally invasive techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"2588-2596"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11639-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has emerged as the preferred surgical method for esophageal cancer resulting from lower morbidity rates for MIE compared to open surgery. However, post-esophagectomy hiatal hernia (PEHH), also known as paraconduit hernia, once rare, is now increasingly observed as a late complication. This study aims to ascertain the prevalence, predictive factors, and surgical management of PEHH following MIE in esophageal cancer patients.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed esophageal cancer patients who underwent MIE between 2013 and 2023. Patients with PEHH were identified through clinical presentation and CT scans and compared to those without PEHH using statistical tests. Variables with p-values less than 0.2 were subjected to multivariate analysis.

Results: Among 371 patients, predominantly male with locally advanced disease (stages 2-4, 90.8%), 25 (6.7%) developed PEHH after a median interval of 24 months post-MIE. The PEHH group exhibited significantly lower BMI and shorter ICU stays. On multivariate analysis BMI < 25 kg/m2 (OR 2.96, CI 1.22-7.20, p = 0.02) and ICU stays (OR 0.67, CI 0.47-0.96, p = 0.03) were independent predictors of PEHH. Surgical repair was performed in 84% of PEHH cases, with 60% symptomatic and 48% emergency surgery. The minimally invasive approach was implemented in 15 patients (71.4%). Primary repair was successfully conducted in 14 cases (66.7%), while mesh was used in one-third of patients.

Conclusion: The increasing prevalence of PEHH with MIE warrants attention. A lower BMI and shorter ICU stay was associated with PEHH. Most cases are symptomatic and effectively managed through minimally invasive techniques.

食管癌微创食管切除术后食管裂孔疝的研究。
前言:微创食管切除术(MIE)已成为食管癌的首选手术方法,因为与开放手术相比,MIE的发病率更低。然而,食管切除术后食道裂孔疝(PEHH),也称为管旁疝,曾经罕见,现在越来越多地作为一种晚期并发症被观察到。本研究旨在探讨食管癌MIE后PEHH的患病率、预测因素及手术治疗。方法:回顾性分析2013年至2023年间接受MIE治疗的食管癌患者。通过临床表现和CT扫描确定PEHH患者,并通过统计学检验将其与非PEHH患者进行比较。p值小于0.2的变量进行多变量分析。结果:在371例患者中,主要为男性,局部晚期疾病(2-4期,90.8%),25例(6.7%)在mie后中位间隔24个月后发生PEHH。PEHH组BMI明显降低,ICU住院时间明显缩短。结论:PEHH合并MIE的患病率上升值得关注。较低的BMI和较短的ICU住院时间与PEHH相关。大多数病例均有症状,可通过微创技术得到有效治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信