Laparoscopic versus open mesh repairs for small-sized ventral and incisional hernias: a propensity score analysis of a retrospective cohort of patients.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Koy Min Chue, Tousif Kabir, Choon Chieh Tan, Jeremy Tian Hui Tan, Juinn Huar Kam, Wai Keong Wong, Huiwen Chua, Alvin Yong Hui Tan, Lester Wei Lin Ong, Faith Qi Hui Leong, Frederick Hong Xiang Koh, Baldwin Po Man Yeung
{"title":"Laparoscopic versus open mesh repairs for small-sized ventral and incisional hernias: a propensity score analysis of a retrospective cohort of patients.","authors":"Koy Min Chue, Tousif Kabir, Choon Chieh Tan, Jeremy Tian Hui Tan, Juinn Huar Kam, Wai Keong Wong, Huiwen Chua, Alvin Yong Hui Tan, Lester Wei Lin Ong, Faith Qi Hui Leong, Frederick Hong Xiang Koh, Baldwin Po Man Yeung","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11627-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For ventral/incisional hernias between 1 and 4 cm, there is still controversy regarding open or laparoscopic mesh repairs. The study evaluated via a propensity-score adjusted analysis, the differences in outcomes between a laparoscopic and open ventral hernia mesh repair.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A single institution retrospective cohort study was performed. All patients with a ventral or incisional hernia between 1 and ≤ 4 cm, with a mesh repair, were reviewed. A propensity-score adjusted analysis was performed to account for baseline differences. Subgroup analyses were also performed. Outcome measures included recurrence, chronic pain, complications, postoperative adhesive occurrences, length of stay and operative duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a 6-year period, 194 patients (91 laparoscopic; 103 open) were included. Mean follow-up duration and defect size were 8.0 months and 2.6 cm, respectively. Baseline differences in the univariate analysis between groups were adjusted for via propensity scoring. In the propensity-score adjusted analysis, a laparoscopic mesh repair was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of postoperative adhesive occurrences, with no differences in recurrence, chronic pain, complications, length of stay and operative duration. This association remained for hernia defects down to ≤ 3 cm. There were no significant differences between the laparoscopic and open groups when stratified for hernia defects of 1-2 cm. For the subgroup analysis, in contrast to an intraperitoneal on-lay mesh placement, open on-lay mesh placement was associated with a higher likelihood of postoperative adhesive occurrences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with small-sized ventral/incisional hernias between 1 and 4 cm, laparoscopic mesh repairs may be associated with reduced postoperative adhesive occurrences, with no difference in other outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"2579-2587"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11627-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: For ventral/incisional hernias between 1 and 4 cm, there is still controversy regarding open or laparoscopic mesh repairs. The study evaluated via a propensity-score adjusted analysis, the differences in outcomes between a laparoscopic and open ventral hernia mesh repair.

Methodology: A single institution retrospective cohort study was performed. All patients with a ventral or incisional hernia between 1 and ≤ 4 cm, with a mesh repair, were reviewed. A propensity-score adjusted analysis was performed to account for baseline differences. Subgroup analyses were also performed. Outcome measures included recurrence, chronic pain, complications, postoperative adhesive occurrences, length of stay and operative duration.

Results: Over a 6-year period, 194 patients (91 laparoscopic; 103 open) were included. Mean follow-up duration and defect size were 8.0 months and 2.6 cm, respectively. Baseline differences in the univariate analysis between groups were adjusted for via propensity scoring. In the propensity-score adjusted analysis, a laparoscopic mesh repair was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of postoperative adhesive occurrences, with no differences in recurrence, chronic pain, complications, length of stay and operative duration. This association remained for hernia defects down to ≤ 3 cm. There were no significant differences between the laparoscopic and open groups when stratified for hernia defects of 1-2 cm. For the subgroup analysis, in contrast to an intraperitoneal on-lay mesh placement, open on-lay mesh placement was associated with a higher likelihood of postoperative adhesive occurrences.

Conclusion: For patients with small-sized ventral/incisional hernias between 1 and 4 cm, laparoscopic mesh repairs may be associated with reduced postoperative adhesive occurrences, with no difference in other outcomes.

腹腔镜与开放式网片修补术治疗小型腹股沟疝和切口疝:对一组回顾性患者进行倾向评分分析。
导言:对于 1 至 4 厘米的腹股沟/切口疝,开腹或腹腔镜网片修补术仍存在争议。该研究通过倾向分数调整分析,评估了腹腔镜和开放式腹股沟疝网片修补术在疗效上的差异:方法:该研究是一项单一机构的回顾性队列研究。研究回顾了所有腹股沟疝或切口疝在 1 厘米至≤ 4 厘米之间并进行过网片修补术的患者。考虑到基线差异,进行了倾向分数调整分析。此外还进行了分组分析。结果指标包括复发、慢性疼痛、并发症、术后粘连发生率、住院时间和手术持续时间:结果:在 6 年的时间里,共纳入了 194 名患者(91 名腹腔镜患者;103 名开腹患者)。平均随访时间和缺损大小分别为 8.0 个月和 2.6 厘米。通过倾向评分调整了单变量分析中各组间的基线差异。在倾向评分调整分析中,腹腔镜网片修复术与术后粘连发生率较低有显著相关性,而在复发、慢性疼痛、并发症、住院时间和手术持续时间方面没有差异。在疝气缺损小于 3 厘米时,这种相关性依然存在。在对1-2厘米的疝气缺损进行分层时,腹腔镜组和开腹组之间没有明显差异。在亚组分析中,与腹腔内铺设网片相比,开放式铺设网片术后发生粘连的可能性更高:结论:对于 1 到 4 厘米的小尺寸腹/切口疝气患者,腹腔镜网片修复术可能会降低术后粘连发生率,但其他结果并无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信