Comparative Efficacy of Intralesional Steroid Injections vs Cryotherapy for the Treatment of Alopecia Areata.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Seemal Akram, Isabella J Tan, Rohan R Shah, Zainab Tariq, Hassan Javaid, Babar Rao
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Intralesional Steroid Injections vs Cryotherapy for the Treatment of Alopecia Areata.","authors":"Seemal Akram, Isabella J Tan, Rohan R Shah, Zainab Tariq, Hassan Javaid, Babar Rao","doi":"10.36849/JDD.8499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The precise etiology of alopecia areata (AA) remains unclear. Various treatments, including corticosteroids, minoxidil, immunotherapy, and phototherapy, have shown varying efficacy. Injectable corticosteroids, despite being invasive, are the first-line treatment, while topical steroids are also commonly used.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of intralesional steroid (triamcinolone acetate) versus cryotherapy for the treatment of alopecia areata over a 6-month period in the Department of Dermatology at the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission General Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 118 patients (aged 15 to 50 years, both genders) with a single patch of alopecia areata on the scalp. Exclusion criteria included active secondary infections, cold intolerance, multiple patches, iatrogenic or primary immunosuppression, pregnancy, or breastfeeding. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A received intralesional steroid injections, and Group B underwent cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen. Treatment efficacy was then evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 27.78 +/- 4.68 years in Group A and 26.63 +/- 4.91 years in Group B. Most patients (95, 80.51%) were aged 15 to 30 years. Males predominated with 86 (72.27%) participants, resulting in a male-to-female ratio of 2.6:1. The mean duration of alopecia areata was similar in Group A (8.51 +/-&nbsp;3.94 months) and Group B (8.39 +/-&nbsp;3.13 months). Group A (intralesional corticosteroids) had a significantly higher efficacy rate, with 49 patients (83.05%) responding positively, compared to 30 patients (50.85%) in Group B (cryotherapy) (P=0.0001), as shown in Table 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concluded that the efficacy of intralesional steroids may be superior to cryotherapy for the treatment of alopecia areata. J Drugs Dermatol. 2025;24(3):294-297. doi:10.36849/JDD.8499.</p>","PeriodicalId":15566,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology","volume":"24 3","pages":"294-297"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.8499","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The precise etiology of alopecia areata (AA) remains unclear. Various treatments, including corticosteroids, minoxidil, immunotherapy, and phototherapy, have shown varying efficacy. Injectable corticosteroids, despite being invasive, are the first-line treatment, while topical steroids are also commonly used.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of intralesional steroid (triamcinolone acetate) versus cryotherapy for the treatment of alopecia areata over a 6-month period in the Department of Dermatology at the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission General Hospital.

Methods: The study included 118 patients (aged 15 to 50 years, both genders) with a single patch of alopecia areata on the scalp. Exclusion criteria included active secondary infections, cold intolerance, multiple patches, iatrogenic or primary immunosuppression, pregnancy, or breastfeeding. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A received intralesional steroid injections, and Group B underwent cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen. Treatment efficacy was then evaluated.

Results: The mean age was 27.78 +/- 4.68 years in Group A and 26.63 +/- 4.91 years in Group B. Most patients (95, 80.51%) were aged 15 to 30 years. Males predominated with 86 (72.27%) participants, resulting in a male-to-female ratio of 2.6:1. The mean duration of alopecia areata was similar in Group A (8.51 +/- 3.94 months) and Group B (8.39 +/- 3.13 months). Group A (intralesional corticosteroids) had a significantly higher efficacy rate, with 49 patients (83.05%) responding positively, compared to 30 patients (50.85%) in Group B (cryotherapy) (P=0.0001), as shown in Table 1.

Conclusion: The study concluded that the efficacy of intralesional steroids may be superior to cryotherapy for the treatment of alopecia areata. J Drugs Dermatol. 2025;24(3):294-297. doi:10.36849/JDD.8499.

病灶内类固醇注射与冷冻治疗斑秃的疗效比较。
斑秃(AA)的确切病因尚不清楚。各种治疗方法,包括皮质类固醇、米诺地尔、免疫疗法和光疗法,显示出不同的疗效。注射皮质类固醇,尽管是侵入性的,是一线治疗,而局部类固醇也常用。目的:比较巴基斯坦原子能委员会总医院皮肤科6个月间病灶内类固醇(醋酸曲安奈德)与冷冻治疗斑秃的疗效。方法:研究纳入118例患者(年龄15 ~ 50岁,男女均可),头皮上有一块斑秃。排除标准包括活动性继发感染、感冒不耐受、多次贴片、医源性或原发性免疫抑制、妊娠或母乳喂养。患者随机分为两组:A组接受局内类固醇注射,B组接受液氮冷冻治疗。然后评估治疗效果。结果:A组患者平均年龄27.78 +/- 4.68岁,b组患者平均年龄26.63 +/- 4.91岁,年龄在15 ~ 30岁之间的占95.5%,占80.51%。男性占主导地位,有86名(72.27%)参与者,男女比例为2.6:1。A组平均脱发持续时间为8.51 +/- 3.94个月,B组平均脱发持续时间为8.39 +/- 3.13个月。A组(病灶内皮质类固醇)的有效率明显高于B组(冷冻治疗),49例(83.05%)患者有阳性反应,而B组(P=0.0001)有30例(50.85%)患者有阳性反应,见表1。结论:病灶内类固醇治疗斑秃的疗效可能优于冷冻治疗。皮肤医学杂志,2025;24(3):294-297。doi: 10.36849 / JDD.8499。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Drugs in Dermatology (JDD) is a peer-reviewed publication indexed with MEDLINE®/PubMed® that was founded by the renowned Dr. Perry Robins MD. Founded in 2002, it offers one of the fastest routes to disseminate dermatologic information and is considered the fastest growing publication in dermatology. We present original articles, award-winning case reports, and timely features pertaining to new methods, techniques, drug therapy, and devices in dermatology that provide readers with peer reviewed content of the utmost quality. Our high standards of content are maintained through a balanced, peer-review process. Articles are reviewed by an International Editorial Board of over 160 renowned experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信