Gengxin Luo , Nannan Shi , Gang Wang , Buzhou Tang
{"title":"Contextual information contributes to biomedical named entity normalization","authors":"Gengxin Luo , Nannan Shi , Gang Wang , Buzhou Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>As one of the most crucial upstream tasks in biomedical informatics, biomedical named entity normalization (BNEN) aims to map mentioned named entities to uniform standard identifiers or terms. Most existing methods only consider the similarity between the individual mention itself and its candidates, however, ignore the valuable information of the context around the mention, which is also very important to understand the real semantic of the mention when it is ambiguous.</div></div><div><h3>Material and Methods:</h3><div>In this paper, based on IA-BIOSYN, a representative SOTA (state-of-the-art) BNEN method, we propose a novel BNEN method with contextual information fusion, called CIFSYN, where the context of a given mention is comprehensively considered by putting the given mention’s candidates in the same context of the mention, and the contextual information fusion module is introduced to capture the relationship among the mention, candidates, and context.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Experiments on five public BNEN datasets show that our proposed method achieves Acc@1 of 0.934, 0.937, 0.969, 0.959, and 0.856 on NCBI-Disease, BC5CDR-Disease, BC5CDR-Chemical, TAC2017-ADR, and COMETA, respectively, significantly better than other existing SOTA methods, and the introduced context information module brings a 0.5% improvement in Acc@1 on average.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>Contextual information around the mention improves the performance of biomedical named entity normalization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 104806"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046425000358","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective:
As one of the most crucial upstream tasks in biomedical informatics, biomedical named entity normalization (BNEN) aims to map mentioned named entities to uniform standard identifiers or terms. Most existing methods only consider the similarity between the individual mention itself and its candidates, however, ignore the valuable information of the context around the mention, which is also very important to understand the real semantic of the mention when it is ambiguous.
Material and Methods:
In this paper, based on IA-BIOSYN, a representative SOTA (state-of-the-art) BNEN method, we propose a novel BNEN method with contextual information fusion, called CIFSYN, where the context of a given mention is comprehensively considered by putting the given mention’s candidates in the same context of the mention, and the contextual information fusion module is introduced to capture the relationship among the mention, candidates, and context.
Results:
Experiments on five public BNEN datasets show that our proposed method achieves Acc@1 of 0.934, 0.937, 0.969, 0.959, and 0.856 on NCBI-Disease, BC5CDR-Disease, BC5CDR-Chemical, TAC2017-ADR, and COMETA, respectively, significantly better than other existing SOTA methods, and the introduced context information module brings a 0.5% improvement in Acc@1 on average.
Conclusion:
Contextual information around the mention improves the performance of biomedical named entity normalization.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.