Comparison of desflurane and sevoflurane as maintenance inhalational anaesthetic agents for adult patients undergoing neurosurgeries: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

IF 2.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-11 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_1215_24
Hori Hariyanto, Monika Widiastuti, Carla Oktaviani Pandrya, Kevin Anderson Surya, William Audi
{"title":"Comparison of desflurane and sevoflurane as maintenance inhalational anaesthetic agents for adult patients undergoing neurosurgeries: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.","authors":"Hori Hariyanto, Monika Widiastuti, Carla Oktaviani Pandrya, Kevin Anderson Surya, William Audi","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_1215_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Despite its superior blood-gas partition coefficient compared to sevoflurane, use of desflurane in neurosurgery is limited due to concerns about cerebral vasodilation and potential adverse haemodynamic effects. This study aims to systematically evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of desflurane and sevoflurane in neurosurgical procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search was performed in the Cochrane Library, Scopus, Europe PMC and Medline databases for articles published until 5 November 2024 using a combination of pertinent keywords. This review includes randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that analyse the comparison between desflurane and sevoflurane in neurosurgery. The risk of bias from each RCT was assessed using the Risk of Bias version 2 tool from Cochrane Collaboration. We utilised random-effects models to evaluate the mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) for the outcomes presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen trials, encompassing 904 patients, were included in the analysis. Our analysis revealed significantly faster recovery profiles with desflurane, including reduced emergence time [MD -2.26; 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.99, -1.52, <i>P</i> < 0.00001, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 71%], extubation time (MD -3.02; 95% CI: -3.89, -2.15, <i>P</i> < 0.00001, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 79%) and overall recovery time (MD -3.26; 95% CI: -5.01, -1.51, <i>P</i> = 0.0003, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 83%), compared to sevoflurane. Desflurane was associated with better postoperative cognitive function, as evidenced by higher short orientation memory concentration test scores - a measure of attention and memory - at 15 min (MD: 2.26; 95% CI: 0.13, 4.39, <i>P</i> = 0.04, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 91%) and 60 min (MD: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.50, <i>P</i> = 0.005, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%) after extubation. We did not find any significant difference in the intra- and/or postoperative events, such as emergence agitation, nausea and vomiting, shivering, hypertension, hypotension, tachycardia, bradycardia, pain and convulsions, between the two groups of intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that desflurane anaesthesia offers faster recovery with a similar safety profile to sevoflurane for neurosurgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"69 1","pages":"65-77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_1215_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Despite its superior blood-gas partition coefficient compared to sevoflurane, use of desflurane in neurosurgery is limited due to concerns about cerebral vasodilation and potential adverse haemodynamic effects. This study aims to systematically evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of desflurane and sevoflurane in neurosurgical procedures.

Methods: A search was performed in the Cochrane Library, Scopus, Europe PMC and Medline databases for articles published until 5 November 2024 using a combination of pertinent keywords. This review includes randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that analyse the comparison between desflurane and sevoflurane in neurosurgery. The risk of bias from each RCT was assessed using the Risk of Bias version 2 tool from Cochrane Collaboration. We utilised random-effects models to evaluate the mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) for the outcomes presented.

Results: Fourteen trials, encompassing 904 patients, were included in the analysis. Our analysis revealed significantly faster recovery profiles with desflurane, including reduced emergence time [MD -2.26; 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.99, -1.52, P < 0.00001, I 2 = 71%], extubation time (MD -3.02; 95% CI: -3.89, -2.15, P < 0.00001, I 2 = 79%) and overall recovery time (MD -3.26; 95% CI: -5.01, -1.51, P = 0.0003, I 2 = 83%), compared to sevoflurane. Desflurane was associated with better postoperative cognitive function, as evidenced by higher short orientation memory concentration test scores - a measure of attention and memory - at 15 min (MD: 2.26; 95% CI: 0.13, 4.39, P = 0.04, I 2 = 91%) and 60 min (MD: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.50, P = 0.005, I 2 = 0%) after extubation. We did not find any significant difference in the intra- and/or postoperative events, such as emergence agitation, nausea and vomiting, shivering, hypertension, hypotension, tachycardia, bradycardia, pain and convulsions, between the two groups of intervention.

Conclusion: This study suggests that desflurane anaesthesia offers faster recovery with a similar safety profile to sevoflurane for neurosurgery.

地氟醚和七氟醚作为神经外科成人患者维持吸入麻醉剂的比较:随机试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景与目的:尽管地氟醚的血气分配系数优于七氟醚,但由于担心其会导致脑血管舒张和潜在的不良血流动力学影响,地氟醚在神经外科中的应用受到限制。本研究旨在系统评价地氟醚和七氟醚在神经外科手术中的比较疗效和安全性。方法:结合相关关键词,在Cochrane Library、Scopus、european PMC和Medline数据库中检索2024年11月5日前发表的文章。本综述包括随机对照试验(rct),分析地氟醚和七氟醚在神经外科中的比较。每个随机对照试验的偏倚风险使用Cochrane Collaboration的第2版偏倚风险工具进行评估。我们使用随机效应模型来评估结果的平均差异(MD)和优势比(OR)。结果:14项试验,904例患者被纳入分析。我们的分析显示地氟醚显著加快了恢复速度,包括缩短了急救时间[MD -2.26;95%置信区间(CI): -2.99, -1.52, P < 0.00001, I 2 = 71%),拔管时间(MD -3.02;95% CI: -3.89, -2.15, P < 0.00001, I 2 = 79%)和总恢复时间(MD -3.26;95% CI: -5.01, -1.51, P = 0.0003, i2 = 83%)。地氟醚与术后更好的认知功能相关,15分钟时更高的短时定向记忆集中测试分数(MD: 2.26;95% CI: 0.13, 4.39, P = 0.04, i2 = 91%)和60 min (MD: 0.29;95% CI: 0.09, 0.50, P = 0.005, i2 = 0%)。我们没有发现两组干预在术中和/或术后事件方面有任何显著差异,如突发性躁动、恶心和呕吐、寒战、高血压、低血压、心动过速、心动过缓、疼痛和抽搐。结论:本研究表明地氟醚麻醉在神经外科手术中恢复更快,安全性与七氟醚相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信