Nicotine e-cigarettes for smoking cessation: a clinical pharmacology perspective.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Victoria Ameral, Mehmet Sofuoglu, Megan M Kelly
{"title":"Nicotine e-cigarettes for smoking cessation: a clinical pharmacology perspective.","authors":"Victoria Ameral, Mehmet Sofuoglu, Megan M Kelly","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2472837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Smoking cessation improves quality of life and increases life expectancy by up to a decade. Though two-thirds of people who smoke report a desire to quit, less than a quarter plan to quit within the coming month. The relative risks and benefits of e-cigarettes, proposed as a novel tool to support smoking cessation, are critical to monitor as the evidence evolves.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review summarizes the evidence for smoking cessation treatment, characteristics and pharmacology of e-cigarettes, support for e-cigarettes for smoking cessation, and relevant harm reduction principles. Populations at the highest risk for continued cigarette smoking (e.g. individuals with co-occurring substance use and mental health conditions) and those who are vulnerable to initiating nicotine use through access to e-cigarettes (e.g. adolescents), are also discussed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Evidence indicating that e-cigarettes are comparable to nicotine replacement therapy points to their promise as a smoking cessation and harm reduction option for individuals who decline other treatment options. Future work should evaluate the comparative efficacy of e-cigarettes for historically excluded groups and the relative effects of specific products and monitor for any long-term effects. Evidence-based clinical guidelines are also needed to inform clinical practice in this rapidly evolving area.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"189-196"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11961306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2025.2472837","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Smoking cessation improves quality of life and increases life expectancy by up to a decade. Though two-thirds of people who smoke report a desire to quit, less than a quarter plan to quit within the coming month. The relative risks and benefits of e-cigarettes, proposed as a novel tool to support smoking cessation, are critical to monitor as the evidence evolves.

Areas covered: This review summarizes the evidence for smoking cessation treatment, characteristics and pharmacology of e-cigarettes, support for e-cigarettes for smoking cessation, and relevant harm reduction principles. Populations at the highest risk for continued cigarette smoking (e.g. individuals with co-occurring substance use and mental health conditions) and those who are vulnerable to initiating nicotine use through access to e-cigarettes (e.g. adolescents), are also discussed.

Expert opinion: Evidence indicating that e-cigarettes are comparable to nicotine replacement therapy points to their promise as a smoking cessation and harm reduction option for individuals who decline other treatment options. Future work should evaluate the comparative efficacy of e-cigarettes for historically excluded groups and the relative effects of specific products and monitor for any long-term effects. Evidence-based clinical guidelines are also needed to inform clinical practice in this rapidly evolving area.

尼古丁电子烟戒烟:临床药理学的观点。
戒烟可以提高生活质量,延长预期寿命长达十年。尽管三分之二的吸烟者表示有戒烟的愿望,但只有不到四分之一的人计划在未来一个月内戒烟。随着证据的发展,电子烟作为一种支持戒烟的新工具,其相对风险和益处对监测至关重要。涵盖领域:本综述总结了戒烟治疗的证据、电子烟的特点和药理学、支持电子烟戒烟以及相关的减少危害原则。还讨论了继续吸烟风险最高的人群(例如同时存在药物使用和精神健康状况的个人)和易因接触电子烟而开始使用尼古丁的人群(例如青少年)。专家意见:有证据表明,电子烟可与尼古丁替代疗法相媲美,这表明电子烟有望成为拒绝其他治疗方案的个人的戒烟和减少伤害的选择。未来的工作应评估电子烟对历史上被排除在外的人群的相对功效,以及特定产品的相对影响,并监测任何长期影响。在这一快速发展的领域,还需要循证临床指南来指导临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Advances in drug development technologies are yielding innovative new therapies, from potentially lifesaving medicines to lifestyle products. In recent years, however, the cost of developing new drugs has soared, and concerns over drug resistance and pharmacoeconomics have come to the fore. Adverse reactions experienced at the clinical trial level serve as a constant reminder of the importance of rigorous safety and toxicity testing. Furthermore the advent of pharmacogenomics and ‘individualized’ approaches to therapy will demand a fresh approach to drug evaluation and healthcare delivery. Clinical Pharmacology provides an essential role in integrating the expertise of all of the specialists and players who are active in meeting such challenges in modern biomedical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信