Understanding oncologic emergencies and related emergency department visits and hospitalizations: a systematic review.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Sule Yilmaz, Komal Aryal, Jasmine King, Jason J Bischof, Arthur S Hong, Nancy Wood, Bonnie E Gould Rothberg, Matthew F Hudson, Sara W Heinert, Monica K Wattana, Christopher J Coyne, Cielito Reyes-Gibby, Knox Todd, Gary Lyman, Adam Klotz, Beau Abar, Corita Grudzen, Aveh Bastani, Christopher W Baugh, Daniel J Henning, Steven Bernstein, Juan Felipe Rico, Richard J Ryan, Sai-Ching Jim Yeung, Aiham Qdaisat, Aasim Padela, Troy E Madsen, Raymond Liu, David Adler
{"title":"Understanding oncologic emergencies and related emergency department visits and hospitalizations: a systematic review.","authors":"Sule Yilmaz, Komal Aryal, Jasmine King, Jason J Bischof, Arthur S Hong, Nancy Wood, Bonnie E Gould Rothberg, Matthew F Hudson, Sara W Heinert, Monica K Wattana, Christopher J Coyne, Cielito Reyes-Gibby, Knox Todd, Gary Lyman, Adam Klotz, Beau Abar, Corita Grudzen, Aveh Bastani, Christopher W Baugh, Daniel J Henning, Steven Bernstein, Juan Felipe Rico, Richard J Ryan, Sai-Ching Jim Yeung, Aiham Qdaisat, Aasim Padela, Troy E Madsen, Raymond Liu, David Adler","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01183-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with cancer frequently visit the emergency department (ED) and are at high risk for hospitalization due to severe illness from cancer progression or treatment side effects. With an aging population and rising cancer incidence rates worldwide, it is crucial to understand how EDs and other acute care venues manage oncologic emergencies. Insights from other nations and health systems may inform resources necessary for optimal ED management and novel care delivery pathways. We described clinical management of oncologic emergencies and their contribution to ED visits and hospitalizations worldwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review of peer-reviewed original research studies published in the English language between January 1st, 2003, to December 31st, 2022, garnered from PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE. We included all studies investigating adult (≥ 18 years) cancer patients with emergency visits. We examined chief complaints or predictors of ED use that explicitly defined oncologic emergencies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search strategy yielded 49 articles addressing cancer-related emergency visits. Most publications reported single-site studies (n = 34/49), with approximately even distribution across clinical settings- ED (n = 22/49) and acute care hospital/ICU (n = 27/49). The number of patient observations varied widely among the published studies (range: 9 - 87,555 patients), with most studies not specifying the cancer type (n = 33/49), stage (n = 41/49), or treatment type (n = 36/49). Most studies (n = 31/49) examined patients aged ≥ 60 years. Infection was the most common oncologic emergency documented (n = 22/49), followed by pain (n = 20/49), dyspnea (n = 19/49), and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms (n = 17/49). Interventions within the ED or hospital ranged from pharmacological management with opioids (n = 11/49), antibiotics (n = 9/49), corticosteroids (n = 5/49), and invasive procedures (e.g., palliative stenting; n = 13/49) or surgical interventions (n = 2/49).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Limited research specifically addresses oncologic emergencies despite the international prevalence of ED presentations among cancer patients. Patients with cancer presenting to the ED appear to have a variety of complaints which could result from their cancers and thus may require tailored diagnostic and intervention pathways to provide optimal acute care. Further acute geriatric oncology research may clarify the optimal management strategies to improve the outcomes for this vulnerable patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883922/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01183-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with cancer frequently visit the emergency department (ED) and are at high risk for hospitalization due to severe illness from cancer progression or treatment side effects. With an aging population and rising cancer incidence rates worldwide, it is crucial to understand how EDs and other acute care venues manage oncologic emergencies. Insights from other nations and health systems may inform resources necessary for optimal ED management and novel care delivery pathways. We described clinical management of oncologic emergencies and their contribution to ED visits and hospitalizations worldwide.

Methods: We performed a systematic review of peer-reviewed original research studies published in the English language between January 1st, 2003, to December 31st, 2022, garnered from PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE. We included all studies investigating adult (≥ 18 years) cancer patients with emergency visits. We examined chief complaints or predictors of ED use that explicitly defined oncologic emergencies.

Results: The search strategy yielded 49 articles addressing cancer-related emergency visits. Most publications reported single-site studies (n = 34/49), with approximately even distribution across clinical settings- ED (n = 22/49) and acute care hospital/ICU (n = 27/49). The number of patient observations varied widely among the published studies (range: 9 - 87,555 patients), with most studies not specifying the cancer type (n = 33/49), stage (n = 41/49), or treatment type (n = 36/49). Most studies (n = 31/49) examined patients aged ≥ 60 years. Infection was the most common oncologic emergency documented (n = 22/49), followed by pain (n = 20/49), dyspnea (n = 19/49), and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms (n = 17/49). Interventions within the ED or hospital ranged from pharmacological management with opioids (n = 11/49), antibiotics (n = 9/49), corticosteroids (n = 5/49), and invasive procedures (e.g., palliative stenting; n = 13/49) or surgical interventions (n = 2/49).

Conclusion: Limited research specifically addresses oncologic emergencies despite the international prevalence of ED presentations among cancer patients. Patients with cancer presenting to the ED appear to have a variety of complaints which could result from their cancers and thus may require tailored diagnostic and intervention pathways to provide optimal acute care. Further acute geriatric oncology research may clarify the optimal management strategies to improve the outcomes for this vulnerable patient population.

理解肿瘤急症和相关急诊科访问和住院:系统回顾。
背景:癌症患者经常访问急诊科(ED),并且由于癌症进展或治疗副作用导致的严重疾病住院的风险很高。随着人口老龄化和全球癌症发病率的上升,了解急诊科和其他急症护理场所如何处理肿瘤紧急情况至关重要。来自其他国家和卫生系统的见解可以为优化急诊科管理和新的护理提供途径提供必要的资源。我们描述了肿瘤急诊的临床管理及其对全球急诊科就诊和住院的贡献。方法:我们对2003年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间发表的同行评议的英文原创研究进行了系统回顾,这些研究来自PubMed、Web of Science和EMBASE。我们纳入了所有调查急诊成年(≥18岁)癌症患者的研究。我们研究了明确定义为肿瘤急症的主诉或ED使用的预测因素。结果:搜索策略产生了49篇关于癌症相关急诊的文章。大多数出版物报道了单点研究(n = 34/49),在临床环境中分布大致均匀——急诊科(n = 22/49)和急症护理医院/ICU (n = 27/49)。在已发表的研究中,观察到的患者数量差异很大(范围:9 - 87,555例患者),大多数研究没有指定癌症类型(n = 33/49)、分期(n = 41/49)或治疗类型(n = 36/49)。大多数研究(n = 31/49)检查的患者年龄≥60岁。感染是最常见的肿瘤急症(n = 22/49),其次是疼痛(n = 20/49)、呼吸困难(n = 19/49)和胃肠道症状(n = 17/49)。急诊科或医院内的干预措施包括阿片类药物(n = 11/49)、抗生素(n = 9/49)、皮质类固醇(n = 5/49)和侵入性手术(例如,姑息性支架置入;N = 13/49)或手术干预(N = 2/49)。结论:尽管ED在癌症患者中的国际流行,但专门针对肿瘤急症的研究有限。到急诊科就诊的癌症患者似乎有各种各样的抱怨,这些抱怨可能是由癌症引起的,因此可能需要量身定制的诊断和干预途径,以提供最佳的急性护理。进一步的急性老年肿瘤学研究可能会阐明最佳的管理策略,以改善这一弱势患者群体的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信