{"title":"Impact of quantitative flow ratio on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion.","authors":"Takuya Tsujimura, Takayuki Ishihara, Taku Toyoshima, Naoko Higashino, Sho Nakao, Yosuke Hata, Masaya Kusuda, Masaharu Masuda, Yasuhiro Matsuda, Toshiaki Mano","doi":"10.1007/s00380-025-02532-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The clinical implication of a post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) quantitative flow ratio (QFR) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) remains insufficiently explored. This single-center retrospective observational study analyzed 195 CTO lesions from 195 CAD patients who underwent successful PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation and were assessed for post-PCI QFR. The primary end point was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 3 years. The receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to calculate the optimal cutoff value of post-PCI QFR for predicting 3-year TLR. Patients were stratified on the basis of the optimal cutoff value, and the predictors for 3-year TLR were assessed by multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. The ROC curve demonstrated that the cutoff value of post-PCI QFR for predicting 3-year TLR was 0.84, with a sensitivity of 61% and specificity of 66%. The cumulative incidence of TLR at 3 years was significantly higher in the low post-PCI QFR group (≤ 0.84) compared to the high post-PCI QFR group (> 0.84) (22.0% versus 8.4%, P = 0.017). In multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR], 0.94 [0.91 to 0.98]), renal failure on dialysis (HR, 3.89 [1.58 to 9.55]), ostial lesion (HR, 5.01 [1.90 to 13.23]), and post-PCI QFR ≤ 0.84 (HR, 2.49 [1.04 to 5.97]) were independent predictors for 3-year TLR. Lower post-PCI QFR was associated with increased 3-year TLR in CAD patients with CTO.</p>","PeriodicalId":12940,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Vessels","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Vessels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-025-02532-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The clinical implication of a post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) quantitative flow ratio (QFR) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) remains insufficiently explored. This single-center retrospective observational study analyzed 195 CTO lesions from 195 CAD patients who underwent successful PCI with drug-eluting stent implantation and were assessed for post-PCI QFR. The primary end point was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 3 years. The receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to calculate the optimal cutoff value of post-PCI QFR for predicting 3-year TLR. Patients were stratified on the basis of the optimal cutoff value, and the predictors for 3-year TLR were assessed by multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. The ROC curve demonstrated that the cutoff value of post-PCI QFR for predicting 3-year TLR was 0.84, with a sensitivity of 61% and specificity of 66%. The cumulative incidence of TLR at 3 years was significantly higher in the low post-PCI QFR group (≤ 0.84) compared to the high post-PCI QFR group (> 0.84) (22.0% versus 8.4%, P = 0.017). In multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR], 0.94 [0.91 to 0.98]), renal failure on dialysis (HR, 3.89 [1.58 to 9.55]), ostial lesion (HR, 5.01 [1.90 to 13.23]), and post-PCI QFR ≤ 0.84 (HR, 2.49 [1.04 to 5.97]) were independent predictors for 3-year TLR. Lower post-PCI QFR was associated with increased 3-year TLR in CAD patients with CTO.
期刊介绍:
Heart and Vessels is an English-language journal that provides a forum of original ideas, excellent methods, and fascinating techniques on cardiovascular disease fields. All papers submitted for publication are evaluated only with regard to scientific quality and relevance to the heart and vessels. Contributions from those engaged in practical medicine, as well as from those involved in basic research, are welcomed.