Julio César Moreno-Alfonso, Ada Molina Caballero, Alberto Pérez Martínez, María Concepción Yárnoz Irazábal
{"title":"Diagnostic value of the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for acute appendicitis.","authors":"Julio César Moreno-Alfonso, Ada Molina Caballero, Alberto Pérez Martínez, María Concepción Yárnoz Irazábal","doi":"10.1111/ans.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The diagnosis of appendicitis in children can present several challenges, leading to an increased risk of complications. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) as a novel adjunctive diagnostic tool for appendicitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Diagnostic study of patients with appendicitis and non-surgical abdominal pain (AP) admitted to our hospital between 2020 and 2022. White blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and dNLR were compared between the two groups of patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 202 patients were enrolled: 101 with appendicitis (69% male, age 9.9 years) and 101 with AP (56% male, age 9.4 years). WBC, NLR, and dNLR were higher in patients in the appendicitis group than in those in the AP group (16.47 versus 11.18 × 10<sup>3</sup> cells/mm<sup>3</sup>; 9.5 versus 3.3; and 5.2 versus 2.3; P ≤ 0.0001, respectively). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, area under ROC curve, and cutoff point of dNLR for the diagnosis of appendicitis were 71%, 74%, 73%, 0.811, and 3.78, respectively. The positive likelihood ratios for WBC, NLR, and dNLR were 1.95, 2.05 and 2.77.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>dNLR is a novel and noninvasive biomarker with high accuracy for diagnosing appendicitis. Its inclusion as an additional diagnostic tool in clinical practice may aid in determining the need for further studies in cases with ambiguous presentations and a dNLR value ≥3.78.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The diagnosis of appendicitis in children can present several challenges, leading to an increased risk of complications. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) as a novel adjunctive diagnostic tool for appendicitis.
Methods: Diagnostic study of patients with appendicitis and non-surgical abdominal pain (AP) admitted to our hospital between 2020 and 2022. White blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and dNLR were compared between the two groups of patients.
Results: Overall, 202 patients were enrolled: 101 with appendicitis (69% male, age 9.9 years) and 101 with AP (56% male, age 9.4 years). WBC, NLR, and dNLR were higher in patients in the appendicitis group than in those in the AP group (16.47 versus 11.18 × 103 cells/mm3; 9.5 versus 3.3; and 5.2 versus 2.3; P ≤ 0.0001, respectively). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, area under ROC curve, and cutoff point of dNLR for the diagnosis of appendicitis were 71%, 74%, 73%, 0.811, and 3.78, respectively. The positive likelihood ratios for WBC, NLR, and dNLR were 1.95, 2.05 and 2.77.
Conclusion: dNLR is a novel and noninvasive biomarker with high accuracy for diagnosing appendicitis. Its inclusion as an additional diagnostic tool in clinical practice may aid in determining the need for further studies in cases with ambiguous presentations and a dNLR value ≥3.78.
期刊介绍:
ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.