A critical analysis of online patient-directed resources on catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias

IF 2.2 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ashish Sood MBBS, Yu J. Hui BSc/MD, Samual Turnbull BSc, Kasun De Silva MBBS, Ashwin Bhaskaran MBBS, MSc (Int Med), Timothy G. Campbell BSc, PhD, Richard G. Bennett BSc, MBChB, PhD, Mary S. Wong BSc, PhD, Saurabh Kumar MBBS, PhD
{"title":"A critical analysis of online patient-directed resources on catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias","authors":"Ashish Sood MBBS,&nbsp;Yu J. Hui BSc/MD,&nbsp;Samual Turnbull BSc,&nbsp;Kasun De Silva MBBS,&nbsp;Ashwin Bhaskaran MBBS, MSc (Int Med),&nbsp;Timothy G. Campbell BSc, PhD,&nbsp;Richard G. Bennett BSc, MBChB, PhD,&nbsp;Mary S. Wong BSc, PhD,&nbsp;Saurabh Kumar MBBS, PhD","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Patients search online content to improve their understanding of medical procedures. The quality of online patient education materials (OPEMs) on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) requires investigation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Six predetermined search terms relating to VA ablation were used to search Google, Bing and Yahoo for written OPEMs, and YouTube for video OPEMs. Written OPEMs were assessed for readability using five readability indices to produce a required reading grade level, and quality using the DISCERN and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) instruments. Video OPEMs were assessed for quality according to compliance with a list of investigator-developed essential discussion points.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>1200 written and 480 videos were identified using the search strategy, of which 60 and 25 respectively were unique OPEMs included in this study. The mean reading grade level for written OPEMs was 11.3 ± 1.9, with no articles being written at the 6th grade level recommended by the American Medical Association. Using quality metrics, only 26.7% of written OPEMs attained a ‘high-quality’ JAMA rating, and 30% had a DISCERN score of ‘good’ or better. Video OPEMs similarly had poor quality, only discussing a mean of 3.50 ± 2.57 out of 18 total essential criteria.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>There is a paucity of online patient-directed materials on VA catheter ablation. Available OPEMs are of insufficient quality to adequately convey essential information, and written OPEMs are written at a level higher than the recommended reading level.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70026","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients search online content to improve their understanding of medical procedures. The quality of online patient education materials (OPEMs) on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) requires investigation.

Methods

Six predetermined search terms relating to VA ablation were used to search Google, Bing and Yahoo for written OPEMs, and YouTube for video OPEMs. Written OPEMs were assessed for readability using five readability indices to produce a required reading grade level, and quality using the DISCERN and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) instruments. Video OPEMs were assessed for quality according to compliance with a list of investigator-developed essential discussion points.

Results

1200 written and 480 videos were identified using the search strategy, of which 60 and 25 respectively were unique OPEMs included in this study. The mean reading grade level for written OPEMs was 11.3 ± 1.9, with no articles being written at the 6th grade level recommended by the American Medical Association. Using quality metrics, only 26.7% of written OPEMs attained a ‘high-quality’ JAMA rating, and 30% had a DISCERN score of ‘good’ or better. Video OPEMs similarly had poor quality, only discussing a mean of 3.50 ± 2.57 out of 18 total essential criteria.

Conclusion

There is a paucity of online patient-directed materials on VA catheter ablation. Available OPEMs are of insufficient quality to adequately convey essential information, and written OPEMs are written at a level higher than the recommended reading level.

Abstract Image

一项针对室性心律失常的导管消融在线患者导向资源的关键分析
患者通过搜索在线内容来提高对医疗程序的理解。关于室性心律失常(VAs)导管消融的在线患者教育材料(OPEMs)的质量需要调查。方法采用预先确定的6个与VA消融相关的搜索词,对b谷歌、Bing和Yahoo进行书面OPEMs搜索,对YouTube进行视频OPEMs搜索。使用五种可读性指标评估书面OPEMs的可读性,以产生所需的阅读等级水平,并使用DISCERN和美国医学协会杂志(JAMA)仪器评估质量。根据研究者制定的基本讨论点清单评估视频OPEMs的质量。结果使用搜索策略识别了1200个书面文本和480个视频,其中60个和25个分别是本研究中包含的独特opem。书面OPEMs的平均阅读年级水平为11.3±1.9,没有文章达到美国医学协会推荐的6年级水平。使用质量指标,只有26.7%的书面opem达到了“高质量”的JAMA评级,30%的opem获得了“良好”或更好的评分。视频OPEMs同样质量很差,在18个基本标准中仅讨论了平均3.50±2.57。结论网上针对患者的室间隔导管消融资料缺乏。可用的opem的质量不足以充分传达重要信息,并且编写的opem的水平高于推荐的阅读水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arrhythmia
Journal of Arrhythmia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信