Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of the Lotic Fish Communities: A Comparison of Coffee Filter-Based Passive eDNA Collection Versus Active eDNA Filtering

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Jelena Mlinarec, Ida Svetličić, Matija Kresonja, Matea Rubinić, Tonko Megyery, Ivana Kaliger, Dominik Mihaljević
{"title":"Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of the Lotic Fish Communities: A Comparison of Coffee Filter-Based Passive eDNA Collection Versus Active eDNA Filtering","authors":"Jelena Mlinarec,&nbsp;Ida Svetličić,&nbsp;Matija Kresonja,&nbsp;Matea Rubinić,&nbsp;Tonko Megyery,&nbsp;Ivana Kaliger,&nbsp;Dominik Mihaljević","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a noninvasive and cost-effective method for fish community monitoring, enabling the determination of both the presence/absence of fish species and their relative quantity in closed systems. However, the integration of these novel eDNA-based methods into current monitoring practices is not straightforward and require standardization of methodological approaches. In this study, we investigated spatial and temporal variation in fish assemblages within two lotic systems in Croatia. Six sampling stations were located alongside the middle section of the river Sava upstream and downstream of Zagreb, and one location in the stream Okićnica. We compared traditional field surveys with two eDNA sampling methodologies: active eDNA filtering and passive eDNA collection. We showed that passive eDNA collection using coffee filters detected fish composition as effectively as active eDNA filtration, providing comparable results in terms of local species richness and spatial variation in fish assemblages. Generally, our eDNA approach detected a greater fish species richness per site than electrofishing. Each single sample captured an average of 18.3 species, from a total of 30 species encountered in the 78 samples. The sites upstream of Zagreb showed significant differences in species read abundance in comparison to the sites downstream. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) plot based on read abundance appeared to be structured according to the type of lotic system, with a clear separation in the two-dimensional space between samples from the river Sava and stream Okićnica and between seasons. A substantial increase in read abundance during spawning periods of certain species was observed, emphasizing the method's utility in unraveling ecological complexities. Altogether, this study exemplifies how eDNA metabarcoding is a powerful tool for community monitoring, providing standardized information that will be valuable for environmental management.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a noninvasive and cost-effective method for fish community monitoring, enabling the determination of both the presence/absence of fish species and their relative quantity in closed systems. However, the integration of these novel eDNA-based methods into current monitoring practices is not straightforward and require standardization of methodological approaches. In this study, we investigated spatial and temporal variation in fish assemblages within two lotic systems in Croatia. Six sampling stations were located alongside the middle section of the river Sava upstream and downstream of Zagreb, and one location in the stream Okićnica. We compared traditional field surveys with two eDNA sampling methodologies: active eDNA filtering and passive eDNA collection. We showed that passive eDNA collection using coffee filters detected fish composition as effectively as active eDNA filtration, providing comparable results in terms of local species richness and spatial variation in fish assemblages. Generally, our eDNA approach detected a greater fish species richness per site than electrofishing. Each single sample captured an average of 18.3 species, from a total of 30 species encountered in the 78 samples. The sites upstream of Zagreb showed significant differences in species read abundance in comparison to the sites downstream. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) plot based on read abundance appeared to be structured according to the type of lotic system, with a clear separation in the two-dimensional space between samples from the river Sava and stream Okićnica and between seasons. A substantial increase in read abundance during spawning periods of certain species was observed, emphasizing the method's utility in unraveling ecological complexities. Altogether, this study exemplifies how eDNA metabarcoding is a powerful tool for community monitoring, providing standardized information that will be valuable for environmental management.

Abstract Image

环境 DNA(eDNA)元条码是一种非侵入性且经济有效的鱼类群落监测方法,可确定封闭系统中鱼类物种的存在/不存在及其相对数量。然而,将这些基于 eDNA 的新方法整合到当前的监测实践中并不简单,需要方法的标准化。在这项研究中,我们调查了克罗地亚两个地段系统中鱼类组合的时空变化。六个采样站位于萨瓦河中段的萨格勒布上游和下游,一个采样站位于奥基奇尼察河。我们比较了传统的实地调查和两种 eDNA 采样方法:主动 eDNA 过滤和被动 eDNA 采集。结果表明,使用咖啡滤纸进行的被动式 eDNA 采集与主动式 eDNA 过滤一样有效地检测到了鱼类组成,在鱼类组合的局部物种丰富度和空间变化方面提供了可比较的结果。一般来说,我们的 eDNA 方法比电鱼法在每个地点检测到的鱼类物种丰富度更高。在 78 个样本中,每个样本平均捕获了 30 个鱼种中的 18.3 个鱼种。萨格勒布上游的地点与下游的地点相比,在物种读数丰度方面存在显著差异。根据读数丰度绘制的非度量多维标度(nMDS)图似乎与地段系统类型有关,在二维空间中,萨瓦河和奥基奇尼察河样本之间以及季节之间存在明显的差异。在某些物种的产卵期,观察到读数丰度大幅增加,这强调了该方法在揭示生态复杂性方面的实用性。总之,这项研究充分体现了 eDNA 代谢编码是群落监测的有力工具,它提供的标准化信息对环境管理非常有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信