Multi-Method Structural Investigation of the Schneiderberg–Baalberge Burial Mound (Saxony-Anhalt, Germany) Including Seismic Full-Waveform Inversion (FWI)

IF 2.1 3区 地球科学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Manuel Zolchow, Daniel Köhn, Dennis Wilken, Ercan Erkul, Stefan Dreibrodt, Natalie Pickartz, Erica Corradini, Johannes Müller, Wolfgang Rabbel
{"title":"Multi-Method Structural Investigation of the Schneiderberg–Baalberge Burial Mound (Saxony-Anhalt, Germany) Including Seismic Full-Waveform Inversion (FWI)","authors":"Manuel Zolchow,&nbsp;Daniel Köhn,&nbsp;Dennis Wilken,&nbsp;Ercan Erkul,&nbsp;Stefan Dreibrodt,&nbsp;Natalie Pickartz,&nbsp;Erica Corradini,&nbsp;Johannes Müller,&nbsp;Wolfgang Rabbel","doi":"10.1002/arp.1961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The construction history and subsequent usage of burial mounds are an important testimony for socio-economic transformation in prehistoric societies. The Baalberge–Schneiderberg burial mound, subject of the presented study, falls in this category as it is considered as an important monument that indicates the emergence of early social stratification during the Chalcolithic period in central Europe. This hypothesis relies on the chronological development of the burial mound, which is not fully understood until now. Therefore, a reconstruction of the complex stratigraphy of the burial mound including construction phases and later alterations is highly relevant for archaeological research, but the required excavations would be onerous and inconsistent with preservation efforts. In this paper, we demonstrate that non-invasive geophysical prospection, especially seismic sounding with shear and Love waves, is suitable to obtain the required stratigraphic information, if seismic full waveform inversion (FWI) and reflection imaging are applied. Complementary information on the preservation state of the mound is obtained through Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) and Electromagnetic Induction (EMI) measurements. To support the seismic and geoelectric results, we utilize Dynamic Testing (DynP), geoarchaeological corings, <sup>14</sup>C-Dating and archaeological records. Our investigations reveal two construction phases of the Baalberge–Schneiderberg mound. The <sup>14</sup>C-Dating yields dates for the older burial mound that are contemporary to the Chalcolithic Baalberge group (4000–3400 <span>bc</span>). During the Early Bronze Age (EBA), the mound was enlarged to its final size by people of the Aunjetitz/Únětice society (2300–1600 <span>bc</span>). However, both seismic and geoelectric depth sections show an extensive disturbance of the original stratigraphy due to former excavations. For this reason, the exact shape of the older burial mound cannot be determined exactly. Based on our data, we estimate that its height was below 2 m. In consequence, the original Baalberge burial mound was less monumental as until now assumed, which potentially prompting a revision of its significance as indicator for social differentiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55490,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Prospection","volume":"32 1","pages":"209-234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/arp.1961","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological Prospection","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arp.1961","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The construction history and subsequent usage of burial mounds are an important testimony for socio-economic transformation in prehistoric societies. The Baalberge–Schneiderberg burial mound, subject of the presented study, falls in this category as it is considered as an important monument that indicates the emergence of early social stratification during the Chalcolithic period in central Europe. This hypothesis relies on the chronological development of the burial mound, which is not fully understood until now. Therefore, a reconstruction of the complex stratigraphy of the burial mound including construction phases and later alterations is highly relevant for archaeological research, but the required excavations would be onerous and inconsistent with preservation efforts. In this paper, we demonstrate that non-invasive geophysical prospection, especially seismic sounding with shear and Love waves, is suitable to obtain the required stratigraphic information, if seismic full waveform inversion (FWI) and reflection imaging are applied. Complementary information on the preservation state of the mound is obtained through Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) and Electromagnetic Induction (EMI) measurements. To support the seismic and geoelectric results, we utilize Dynamic Testing (DynP), geoarchaeological corings, 14C-Dating and archaeological records. Our investigations reveal two construction phases of the Baalberge–Schneiderberg mound. The 14C-Dating yields dates for the older burial mound that are contemporary to the Chalcolithic Baalberge group (4000–3400 bc). During the Early Bronze Age (EBA), the mound was enlarged to its final size by people of the Aunjetitz/Únětice society (2300–1600 bc). However, both seismic and geoelectric depth sections show an extensive disturbance of the original stratigraphy due to former excavations. For this reason, the exact shape of the older burial mound cannot be determined exactly. Based on our data, we estimate that its height was below 2 m. In consequence, the original Baalberge burial mound was less monumental as until now assumed, which potentially prompting a revision of its significance as indicator for social differentiation.

Abstract Image

德国萨克森-安哈尔特Schneiderberg-Baalberge土丘结构的多方法研究(包括地震全波形反演)
土丘的建造历史和后来的使用是史前社会社会经济转型的重要见证。本次研究的主题Baalberge-Schneiderberg墓葬丘就属于这一类,因为它被认为是中欧石器时代早期社会分层出现的重要纪念碑。这一假设依赖于墓丘的年代发展,而这一点直到现在还没有被完全理解。因此,重建包括施工阶段和后期变化在内的复杂地层与考古研究高度相关,但所需的挖掘工作将是繁重的,与保护工作不一致。本文论证了在地震全波形反演(FWI)和反射成像技术的应用下,非侵入性物探特别是横波和洛夫波地震测深可以获得所需的地层信息。通过电阻率层析成像(ERT)和电磁感应(EMI)测量获得了土墩保存状态的补充信息。为了支持地震和地电结果,我们利用了动态测试(DynP)、地质考古岩芯、14c测年和考古记录。我们的调查揭示了Baalberge-Schneiderberg土墩的两个施工阶段。14c年代测定法得出了与铜石器时代Baalberge组(公元前4000-3400年)同时代的更古老的墓丘的年代。在早期青铜时代(EBA),这个土墩被unjetitz/Únětice社会(公元前2300-1600年)的人们扩大到最后的规模。然而,地震和地电深度剖面显示,由于以前的挖掘,原始地层受到了广泛的干扰。由于这个原因,不能确切地确定更古老的墓丘的确切形状。根据我们的数据,我们估计它的高度在2米以下。因此,最初的Baalberge墓葬丘不像现在假设的那样具有纪念意义,这可能促使人们对其作为社会分化指标的意义进行修订。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archaeological Prospection
Archaeological Prospection 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the Journal will be international, covering urban, rural and marine environments and the full range of underlying geology. The Journal will contain articles relating to the use of a wide range of propecting techniques, including remote sensing (airborne and satellite), geophysical (e.g. resistivity, magnetometry) and geochemical (e.g. organic markers, soil phosphate). Reports and field evaluations of new techniques will be welcomed. Contributions will be encouraged on the application of relevant software, including G.I.S. analysis, to the data derived from prospection techniques and cartographic analysis of early maps. Reports on integrated site evaluations and follow-up site investigations will be particularly encouraged. The Journal will welcome contributions, in the form of short (field) reports, on the application of prospection techniques in support of comprehensive land-use studies. The Journal will, as appropriate, contain book reviews, conference and meeting reviews, and software evaluation. All papers will be subjected to peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信