Costs of biomarker testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a global study comparing next-generation sequencing and single-gene testing

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Umberto Malapelle, Chien-Chin Chen, Enrique de Álava, Paul Hofman, Daniel Kazdal, Tae-Jung Kim, Tony Kiat Hon Lim, Aleš Ryška, Angelica A Saetta, Ed Schuuring, Giancarlo Troncone, Michele Biscuola, Yi-Lin Chen, Gek San Tan, Charles Hugo Marquette, Maria Michelli, Arja ter Elst, Hana Vošmiková, Joshua Kapp, Sebastian Gonzalez-McQuire, Andromachi Giannopoulou, Jean Marie Franzini, Victoria Lucia Rabsiun Aramburu, Anna Baggi, Albrecht Stenzinger
{"title":"Costs of biomarker testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a global study comparing next-generation sequencing and single-gene testing","authors":"Umberto Malapelle,&nbsp;Chien-Chin Chen,&nbsp;Enrique de Álava,&nbsp;Paul Hofman,&nbsp;Daniel Kazdal,&nbsp;Tae-Jung Kim,&nbsp;Tony Kiat Hon Lim,&nbsp;Aleš Ryška,&nbsp;Angelica A Saetta,&nbsp;Ed Schuuring,&nbsp;Giancarlo Troncone,&nbsp;Michele Biscuola,&nbsp;Yi-Lin Chen,&nbsp;Gek San Tan,&nbsp;Charles Hugo Marquette,&nbsp;Maria Michelli,&nbsp;Arja ter Elst,&nbsp;Hana Vošmiková,&nbsp;Joshua Kapp,&nbsp;Sebastian Gonzalez-McQuire,&nbsp;Andromachi Giannopoulou,&nbsp;Jean Marie Franzini,&nbsp;Victoria Lucia Rabsiun Aramburu,&nbsp;Anna Baggi,&nbsp;Albrecht Stenzinger","doi":"10.1002/2056-4538.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Current European/US guidelines recommend that molecular testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) be performed using next-generation sequencing (NGS). However, the global uptake of NGS is limited, largely owing to reimbursement constraints. We compared real-world costs of NGS and single-gene testing (SGT) in nonsquamous aNSCLC. This observational study was conducted across 10 pathology centers in 10 different countries worldwide. Biomarker data collected via structured questionnaires (1 January–31 December 2021) were used to feed micro-costing analyses for three scenarios [‘Starting Point’ (SP; 2021–2022), ‘Current Practice’ (CP; 2023–2024), and ‘Future Horizons’ (FH; 2025–2028)] in both a real-world model, comprising all biomarkers tested by each center, and a standardized model, comprising the same sets of biomarkers across centers. Testing costs (including retesting) encompassed personnel costs, consumables, equipment, and overheads. Overall, 4,491 patients with aNSCLC were evaluated. Mean per-patient costs decreased for NGS relative to SGT over time, with real-world model costs 18% lower for NGS than for SGT in the SP scenario, and 26% lower for NGS than for SGT in the CP scenario. Mean per-biomarker costs also decreased over time for NGS relative to SGT. In the standardized model, the tipping point for the minimum number of biomarkers required for NGS to result in cost savings (per patient) was 10 and 12 in the SP and CP scenarios, respectively. Retesting had a negligible impact on cost analyses, and results were robust to variation in cost parameters. This study provides robust real-world global evidence for cost savings with NGS-based panels over SGT to evaluate predictive biomarkers in nonsquamous aNSCLC when the number of biomarkers to be tested exceeds 10. Widespread adoption of NGS may enable more efficient use of limited healthcare resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":48612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/2056-4538.70018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2056-4538.70018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current European/US guidelines recommend that molecular testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) be performed using next-generation sequencing (NGS). However, the global uptake of NGS is limited, largely owing to reimbursement constraints. We compared real-world costs of NGS and single-gene testing (SGT) in nonsquamous aNSCLC. This observational study was conducted across 10 pathology centers in 10 different countries worldwide. Biomarker data collected via structured questionnaires (1 January–31 December 2021) were used to feed micro-costing analyses for three scenarios [‘Starting Point’ (SP; 2021–2022), ‘Current Practice’ (CP; 2023–2024), and ‘Future Horizons’ (FH; 2025–2028)] in both a real-world model, comprising all biomarkers tested by each center, and a standardized model, comprising the same sets of biomarkers across centers. Testing costs (including retesting) encompassed personnel costs, consumables, equipment, and overheads. Overall, 4,491 patients with aNSCLC were evaluated. Mean per-patient costs decreased for NGS relative to SGT over time, with real-world model costs 18% lower for NGS than for SGT in the SP scenario, and 26% lower for NGS than for SGT in the CP scenario. Mean per-biomarker costs also decreased over time for NGS relative to SGT. In the standardized model, the tipping point for the minimum number of biomarkers required for NGS to result in cost savings (per patient) was 10 and 12 in the SP and CP scenarios, respectively. Retesting had a negligible impact on cost analyses, and results were robust to variation in cost parameters. This study provides robust real-world global evidence for cost savings with NGS-based panels over SGT to evaluate predictive biomarkers in nonsquamous aNSCLC when the number of biomarkers to be tested exceeds 10. Widespread adoption of NGS may enable more efficient use of limited healthcare resources.

Abstract Image

晚期非小细胞肺癌生物标志物检测的成本:一项比较下一代测序和单基因检测的全球研究
现行的欧洲/美国指南建议使用新一代测序技术(NGS)对晚期非小细胞肺癌(aNSCLC)进行分子检测。然而,主要由于报销限制,全球对 NGS 的接受程度有限。我们对非鳞癌 aNSCLC 的 NGS 和单基因检测 (SGT) 的实际费用进行了比较。这项观察性研究在全球 10 个不同国家的 10 个病理中心进行。通过结构化问卷调查收集的生物标记物数据(2021 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日)被用于三种情景的微观成本计算分析["起点"(SP;2021-2022 年)、"当前实践"(CP;2023-2024 年)和 "未来地平线"(FH;2025-2028 年)],既包括真实世界模型(包括每个中心检测的所有生物标记物),也包括标准化模型(包括各中心相同的生物标记物)。检测成本(包括重新检测)包括人员成本、耗材、设备和管理费用。共对 4,491 名 NSCLC 患者进行了评估。随着时间的推移,NGS 的平均每位患者成本相对于 SGT 有所下降,在 SP 方案中,NGS 的真实世界模型成本比 SGT 低 18%,在 CP 方案中,NGS 的真实世界模型成本比 SGT 低 26%。与 SGT 相比,NGS 的平均单位生物标记物成本也随时间推移而降低。在标准化模型中,在 SP 和 CP 方案中,NGS 为节省成本(每位患者)所需生物标记物最低数量的临界点分别为 10 和 12。重新检测对成本分析的影响可以忽略不计,而且结果对成本参数的变化也是稳健的。这项研究提供了可靠的真实世界全球证据,证明在非鳞状 aNSCLC 中,当需要检测的生物标记物数量超过 10 个时,使用基于 NGS 的检测组比使用 SGT 评估预测性生物标记物更能节约成本。广泛采用 NGS 可使有限的医疗资源得到更有效的利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
47
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research and The Journal of Pathology serve as translational bridges between basic biomedical science and clinical medicine with particular emphasis on, but not restricted to, tissue based studies. The focus of The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research is the publication of studies that illuminate the clinical relevance of research in the broad area of the study of disease. Appropriately powered and validated studies with novel diagnostic, prognostic and predictive significance, and biomarker discover and validation, will be welcomed. Studies with a predominantly mechanistic basis will be more appropriate for the companion Journal of Pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信