Good Laboratory Practice in Preclinical Research: Lessons Learned from Warning Letters Issued Between 2019 and 2024 Addressing Violations to the 21 Code of Federal Regulation Part 58

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Isra Dmour
{"title":"Good Laboratory Practice in Preclinical Research: Lessons Learned from Warning Letters Issued Between 2019 and 2024 Addressing Violations to the 21 Code of Federal Regulation Part 58","authors":"Isra Dmour","doi":"10.1007/s12247-025-09932-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The study aims to critically review US FDA warning letters (WLs) issued during inspections between 2019 and 2024 for compliance with Good Laboratory Practice in Preclinical research facilities.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>WLs were downloaded from the US FDA public domain of the WLs and the content of each WL was assessed based on types and frequencies of violations and corrective and preventive actions (CAPA) employed by the testing facility or requested by the FDA investigators. Each WL was evaluated and critically analyzed about the applicable regulation. Violations were correlated with consequences of non-compliance, as addressed by the FDA inspectors.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Eight WLs letters were analyzed. The incidence of violations concerning the QAU’s failure to meet responsibilities, documentation deficiencies, noncompliance with study protocols, deviations in animal handling, and data capture in the final study report was 12% each. The violations concerning the study director’s failure to fulfil his/her duties and deficient/ noncompliance to pertinent SOPs were 10% each. The incidence of inadequate qualifications among study personnel and the management of specimens/reagents and controls was 9% and 6%, respectively. The minimal variance was linked to specimen/record retention (5%).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Testing facilities in preclinical research are requested to evaluate personnel responsibilities, improve GLP training programs, and implement adequate standard procedures to comply with GLP standards, reducing the recurrence of these violations and enhancing data integrity and validity that will support a clinical submission.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation","volume":"20 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12247-025-09932-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The study aims to critically review US FDA warning letters (WLs) issued during inspections between 2019 and 2024 for compliance with Good Laboratory Practice in Preclinical research facilities.

Methods

WLs were downloaded from the US FDA public domain of the WLs and the content of each WL was assessed based on types and frequencies of violations and corrective and preventive actions (CAPA) employed by the testing facility or requested by the FDA investigators. Each WL was evaluated and critically analyzed about the applicable regulation. Violations were correlated with consequences of non-compliance, as addressed by the FDA inspectors.

Results

Eight WLs letters were analyzed. The incidence of violations concerning the QAU’s failure to meet responsibilities, documentation deficiencies, noncompliance with study protocols, deviations in animal handling, and data capture in the final study report was 12% each. The violations concerning the study director’s failure to fulfil his/her duties and deficient/ noncompliance to pertinent SOPs were 10% each. The incidence of inadequate qualifications among study personnel and the management of specimens/reagents and controls was 9% and 6%, respectively. The minimal variance was linked to specimen/record retention (5%).

Conclusion

Testing facilities in preclinical research are requested to evaluate personnel responsibilities, improve GLP training programs, and implement adequate standard procedures to comply with GLP standards, reducing the recurrence of these violations and enhancing data integrity and validity that will support a clinical submission.

临床前研究中的良好实验室规范:从2019年至2024年发布的警告信中吸取的教训,这些警告信涉及违反21联邦法规第58部分的行为
该研究旨在严格审查美国FDA在2019年至2024年检查期间发布的警告信(wl),以符合临床前研究设施的良好实验室规范。方法从美国FDA的WL公共领域下载WL,并根据检测机构采用的或FDA调查人员要求的违规类型和频率以及纠正和预防措施(CAPA)对每个WL的内容进行评估。对每个WL进行了评估,并对适用的法规进行了批判性分析。正如FDA检查员所指出的那样,违规行为与不合规的后果相关。结果对8个WLs字母进行了分析。QAU未能履行职责、文件缺陷、不遵守研究方案、动物处理偏差和最终研究报告中的数据采集等违规事件的发生率分别为12%。研究主任未能履行其职责和不充分/不遵守相关标准操作规程的违规行为各占10%。研究人员、标本/试剂和对照品管理资质不足的发生率分别为9%和6%。最小方差与标本/记录保留有关(5%)。临床前研究的测试机构需要评估人员责任,改进GLP培训计划,并实施适当的标准程序以符合GLP标准,减少这些违规行为的再次发生,提高数据的完整性和有效性,以支持临床提交。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation (JPI), is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to publishing high quality papers emphasizing innovative research and applied technologies within the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. JPI''s goal is to be the premier communication vehicle for the critical body of knowledge that is needed for scientific evolution and technical innovation, from R&D to market. Topics will fall under the following categories: Materials science, Product design, Process design, optimization, automation and control, Facilities; Information management, Regulatory policy and strategy, Supply chain developments , Education and professional development, Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation publishes four issues a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信