Jeonghyeon Lee, Minye Seo, Woori Cho, Jai-Young Lee
{"title":"The effect of heavy metal stabilizers in arsenic-contaminated soil: using bioavailability","authors":"Jeonghyeon Lee, Minye Seo, Woori Cho, Jai-Young Lee","doi":"10.1007/s10163-024-02155-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Crops grown in arsenic-contaminated soil can negatively impact human health and ecosystems due to the transfer of arsenic. Therefore, it is essential to implement chemical stabilization to reduce bioavailability. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of stabilizers in reducing bioavailability. The stabilizers used were Fe(iron)–steel slag and Ecosta-A, a mixture of oyster shell and layer-double hydroxide(LDH). Phytoavailability and bioconcentration factor (BCF) were selected for evaluation of bioavailability. The study involved three conditions: A (stabilizer-free), B (Fe–steel slag treatment), and C (Ecosta-A treatment). Pots measuring 3 m × 3 m × 1 m were filled with arsenic-contaminated soil, and the stabilizers were mixed at a 5% ratio to the soil content and cured for about 18 months. <i>Allium fistulosum L.</i> (Welsh onions), <i>Eruca vesicaria</i> (Lettuce), and <i>Zea mays L.</i> (Corn) were then planted and grown for about 1–2 months. The phytoavailability test showed that arsenic content in the soil decreased by 97.06% in Condition C compared to Condition A, while it increased by 55.60% in Condition B. The BCF was calculated based on USEPA standards. BCF values were exceeded in the roots of plants under all conditions, and no translocation was observed in the edible parts of plants grown under conditions B and C. Therefore, this study demonstrates that evaluate phytoavailability and BCF is important for confirming the effect of stabilizers in reducing bioavailability. The results suggest that the Ecosta-A stabilizer is more effective in this regard.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"27 2","pages":"746 - 760"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-024-02155-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Crops grown in arsenic-contaminated soil can negatively impact human health and ecosystems due to the transfer of arsenic. Therefore, it is essential to implement chemical stabilization to reduce bioavailability. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of stabilizers in reducing bioavailability. The stabilizers used were Fe(iron)–steel slag and Ecosta-A, a mixture of oyster shell and layer-double hydroxide(LDH). Phytoavailability and bioconcentration factor (BCF) were selected for evaluation of bioavailability. The study involved three conditions: A (stabilizer-free), B (Fe–steel slag treatment), and C (Ecosta-A treatment). Pots measuring 3 m × 3 m × 1 m were filled with arsenic-contaminated soil, and the stabilizers were mixed at a 5% ratio to the soil content and cured for about 18 months. Allium fistulosum L. (Welsh onions), Eruca vesicaria (Lettuce), and Zea mays L. (Corn) were then planted and grown for about 1–2 months. The phytoavailability test showed that arsenic content in the soil decreased by 97.06% in Condition C compared to Condition A, while it increased by 55.60% in Condition B. The BCF was calculated based on USEPA standards. BCF values were exceeded in the roots of plants under all conditions, and no translocation was observed in the edible parts of plants grown under conditions B and C. Therefore, this study demonstrates that evaluate phytoavailability and BCF is important for confirming the effect of stabilizers in reducing bioavailability. The results suggest that the Ecosta-A stabilizer is more effective in this regard.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles.
The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management.
The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).