Crowdsourcing-enabled AI: Unlocking value in digital services

IF 9.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Maciel M. Queiroz , Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour , Mehdi Bagherzadeh
{"title":"Crowdsourcing-enabled AI: Unlocking value in digital services","authors":"Maciel M. Queiroz ,&nbsp;Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour ,&nbsp;Mehdi Bagherzadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the existing literature on the role of digital tools, such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, in creating high-value digital services, empirical insights into the role of <em>crowdsourcing-enabled AI</em> tools, those leveraging crowdsourcing to gather the data necessary for AI tool development, remain limited. This gap is especially notable when considering the type of crowdsourcing participants (e.g., general crowd versus specialists) and the pace of technological change in the business landscape, as critical factors in developing digital service using <em>crowdsourcing-enabled AI</em> tools. Drawing on a cross-industry sample of firms collected through an online survey, our findings reveal that involving both the general crowd and specialists contributes to value creation by enhancing customer relationships, improving production and operations, and advancing product and service development. However, in environments characterized by rapid technological change (i.e., high technological turbulence), the involvement of specialists with expert knowledge becomes essential for value creation. These findings highlight the importance of selecting suitable crowdsourcing participants based on the pace of technological change to ensure that digital services developed through <em>crowdsourcing-enabled AI</em> tools deliver substantial value. This study highlights the critical role of leveraging <em>crowdsourcing-enabled AI</em> tools in the development of high-value digital services. It also emphasizes the necessity of considering contingency factors —such as the type of crowdsourcing participants and the degree of technological turbulence —when studying how digital services generate value. By defining the boundary conditions under which such digital services succeed, our research advances the literature and provides clarity on why some digital services achieve success while others do not.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"283 ","pages":"Article 109586"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527325000714","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the existing literature on the role of digital tools, such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, in creating high-value digital services, empirical insights into the role of crowdsourcing-enabled AI tools, those leveraging crowdsourcing to gather the data necessary for AI tool development, remain limited. This gap is especially notable when considering the type of crowdsourcing participants (e.g., general crowd versus specialists) and the pace of technological change in the business landscape, as critical factors in developing digital service using crowdsourcing-enabled AI tools. Drawing on a cross-industry sample of firms collected through an online survey, our findings reveal that involving both the general crowd and specialists contributes to value creation by enhancing customer relationships, improving production and operations, and advancing product and service development. However, in environments characterized by rapid technological change (i.e., high technological turbulence), the involvement of specialists with expert knowledge becomes essential for value creation. These findings highlight the importance of selecting suitable crowdsourcing participants based on the pace of technological change to ensure that digital services developed through crowdsourcing-enabled AI tools deliver substantial value. This study highlights the critical role of leveraging crowdsourcing-enabled AI tools in the development of high-value digital services. It also emphasizes the necessity of considering contingency factors —such as the type of crowdsourcing participants and the degree of technological turbulence —when studying how digital services generate value. By defining the boundary conditions under which such digital services succeed, our research advances the literature and provides clarity on why some digital services achieve success while others do not.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Production Economics
International Journal of Production Economics 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
266
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信