Amir Hossein Ghaderi , Shiva Taghizadeh , Mohammad Ali Nazari
{"title":"Altered visual network modularity and communication in ADHD subtypes: Classification via source-localized EEG modules","authors":"Amir Hossein Ghaderi , Shiva Taghizadeh , Mohammad Ali Nazari","doi":"10.1016/j.bspc.2025.107755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The neurobiological basis of ADHD subtypes remains unclear. This study investigates how ADHD subtypes affect modularity of functional brain networks across different oscillatory bands. We analyzed EEG data from across three groups: normally developing, ADHD-Inattentive, and ADHD-Combined. EEG source-localized current densities were estimated and lagged coherence between the ROIs was calculated across seven frequency bands. We evaluated the modularity of five functional brain networks (default mode, central control, salience, visual, and sensorimotor) and assessed edge betweenness centrality to examine network communications. Nonparametric tests revealed significantly lower visual network modularity in ADHD groups in the alpha1 band (8–10 Hz). Communication between the visual and other networks (excluding the salience) was also significantly reduced in ADHD groups. No significant modularity or inter-network communication differences were observed between the ADHD subtypes. A supervised classification algorithm using subnetwork modularity as input achieved high accuracy (88.9 %) in classifying normally developing and ADHD groups based on alpha1 band data. The modularity of the sensorimotor, visual, and default mode networks emerged as key predictors. However, classification accuracy declined when distinguishing between the two ADHD subtypes. Results suggest impairment in early sensory (visual) processing in ADHD. Additionally, the combined modularity of the sensorimotor, visual, and default mode networks may serve as a potential biomarker for ADHD. Our results support a shared neural basis for ADHD subtypes, reinforcing the view that they are likely subtypes of the same disorder rather than distinct conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55362,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 107755"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746809425002666","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The neurobiological basis of ADHD subtypes remains unclear. This study investigates how ADHD subtypes affect modularity of functional brain networks across different oscillatory bands. We analyzed EEG data from across three groups: normally developing, ADHD-Inattentive, and ADHD-Combined. EEG source-localized current densities were estimated and lagged coherence between the ROIs was calculated across seven frequency bands. We evaluated the modularity of five functional brain networks (default mode, central control, salience, visual, and sensorimotor) and assessed edge betweenness centrality to examine network communications. Nonparametric tests revealed significantly lower visual network modularity in ADHD groups in the alpha1 band (8–10 Hz). Communication between the visual and other networks (excluding the salience) was also significantly reduced in ADHD groups. No significant modularity or inter-network communication differences were observed between the ADHD subtypes. A supervised classification algorithm using subnetwork modularity as input achieved high accuracy (88.9 %) in classifying normally developing and ADHD groups based on alpha1 band data. The modularity of the sensorimotor, visual, and default mode networks emerged as key predictors. However, classification accuracy declined when distinguishing between the two ADHD subtypes. Results suggest impairment in early sensory (visual) processing in ADHD. Additionally, the combined modularity of the sensorimotor, visual, and default mode networks may serve as a potential biomarker for ADHD. Our results support a shared neural basis for ADHD subtypes, reinforcing the view that they are likely subtypes of the same disorder rather than distinct conditions.
期刊介绍:
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control aims to provide a cross-disciplinary international forum for the interchange of information on research in the measurement and analysis of signals and images in clinical medicine and the biological sciences. Emphasis is placed on contributions dealing with the practical, applications-led research on the use of methods and devices in clinical diagnosis, patient monitoring and management.
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control reflects the main areas in which these methods are being used and developed at the interface of both engineering and clinical science. The scope of the journal is defined to include relevant review papers, technical notes, short communications and letters. Tutorial papers and special issues will also be published.