Clinical and Radiological Criteria for Surgery in Posttraumatic Extradural Hematoma: An Update from Central India.

Asian journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-12-06 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1795164
Ela Haider Rizvi, Snehil Sharma, Mohammad Kashif, Suramya Maheshwari, Ravi Pratap Singh, Atul Kumar Khare
{"title":"Clinical and Radiological Criteria for Surgery in Posttraumatic Extradural Hematoma: An Update from Central India.","authors":"Ela Haider Rizvi, Snehil Sharma, Mohammad Kashif, Suramya Maheshwari, Ravi Pratap Singh, Atul Kumar Khare","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1795164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  The surgical management guidelines for any intracranial hemorrhage were objectively defined by the Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) in 2006 for patients who should be treated surgically or conservatively. Since then, not much work has been done toward the identification of patients who are at high risk and may have progression of the hematoma who may ultimately require surgery. This study aimed to apply the said criteria to all patients coming to the hospital with extradural hematoma (EDH) and analyze the outcome of the patient whether treated conservatively or surgically on the basis of the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and to observe the factors and variables that are associated with EDH that will help in furthering the demographic design of the entity in central India. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  A prospective and retrospective, ambivalent cohort study was performed at a hospital in central India involving all cases of computed tomography (CT) diagnosed EDH that were reported to the center from October 2016 to March 2018. A total of 78 patients were included in the study. Patients were selected and managed conservatively or surgically as per the criteria and were followed up until the outcome. In retrospective analysis, we evaluated the current criteria for surgery in all patients of posttraumatic EDH in the past 5 years and whose records were available. Condition on discharge or the outcome along with GOS was taken as the endpoint for retrospective analysis. <b>Results</b>  Temporoparietal and frontal regions were the most common sites of EDH and also presented higher mortality rates as compared with other sites. The majority of patients had EDH of length of greater than 5 cm and the mortality rate for the same group also increased with lesser survival chances with length of greater than 10 cm. Patients who presented with an EDH of greater than 1-cm width were higher in numbers, with survival rates decreasing with an increase in width, especially with an EDH greater than 2 cm. <b>Conclusion</b> We conclude that the criteria laid out by the BTF, namely, CT findings of an EDH volume greater than 30 mL, width greater than 15 mm, and mildline shift of greater than 5 mm, hold good in cases of EDH. This study reviewed the previous criteria in the Indian setting and found them to hold good so far.</p>","PeriodicalId":94300,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"105-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11875698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1795164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background  The surgical management guidelines for any intracranial hemorrhage were objectively defined by the Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) in 2006 for patients who should be treated surgically or conservatively. Since then, not much work has been done toward the identification of patients who are at high risk and may have progression of the hematoma who may ultimately require surgery. This study aimed to apply the said criteria to all patients coming to the hospital with extradural hematoma (EDH) and analyze the outcome of the patient whether treated conservatively or surgically on the basis of the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and to observe the factors and variables that are associated with EDH that will help in furthering the demographic design of the entity in central India. Materials and Methods  A prospective and retrospective, ambivalent cohort study was performed at a hospital in central India involving all cases of computed tomography (CT) diagnosed EDH that were reported to the center from October 2016 to March 2018. A total of 78 patients were included in the study. Patients were selected and managed conservatively or surgically as per the criteria and were followed up until the outcome. In retrospective analysis, we evaluated the current criteria for surgery in all patients of posttraumatic EDH in the past 5 years and whose records were available. Condition on discharge or the outcome along with GOS was taken as the endpoint for retrospective analysis. Results  Temporoparietal and frontal regions were the most common sites of EDH and also presented higher mortality rates as compared with other sites. The majority of patients had EDH of length of greater than 5 cm and the mortality rate for the same group also increased with lesser survival chances with length of greater than 10 cm. Patients who presented with an EDH of greater than 1-cm width were higher in numbers, with survival rates decreasing with an increase in width, especially with an EDH greater than 2 cm. Conclusion We conclude that the criteria laid out by the BTF, namely, CT findings of an EDH volume greater than 30 mL, width greater than 15 mm, and mildline shift of greater than 5 mm, hold good in cases of EDH. This study reviewed the previous criteria in the Indian setting and found them to hold good so far.

外伤性硬膜外血肿手术的临床和放射学标准:来自印度中部的最新进展。
背景颅脑外伤基金会(BTF)于2006年客观地制定了颅内出血的手术治疗指南,以确定患者应采取手术或保守治疗。从那时起,没有太多的工作是为了识别高风险患者,可能有血肿进展,最终可能需要手术。本研究旨在将上述标准应用于所有因硬膜外血肿(EDH)来医院的患者,并根据格拉斯哥结果量表(GOS)分析患者的结果,无论是保守治疗还是手术治疗,并观察与EDH相关的因素和变量,这将有助于进一步改进印度中部实体的人口统计学设计。材料和方法在印度中部的一家医院进行了一项前瞻性和回顾性的矛盾队列研究,涉及2016年10月至2018年3月期间向该中心报告的所有计算机断层扫描(CT)诊断为EDH的病例。共有78名患者被纳入研究。选择患者并按照标准进行保守或手术治疗,并随访至结果。在回顾性分析中,我们评估了过去5年中所有有记录的创伤后EDH患者的现行手术标准。以出院情况或GOS预后为终点进行回顾性分析。结果颞顶叶和额叶是EDH最常见的发病部位,且死亡率高于其他部位。大多数患者的EDH长度大于5 cm,同一组的死亡率也增加,长度大于10 cm的患者生存机会较小。EDH宽度大于1cm的患者数量较多,生存率随着EDH宽度的增加而降低,尤其是EDH宽度大于2cm的患者。我们得出结论,BTF提出的标准,即EDH体积大于30 mL,宽度大于15 mm,温和线移位大于5 mm的CT表现,适用于EDH病例。这项研究回顾了以前在印度设定的标准,发现它们到目前为止都是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信