Evaluating a Canadian tertiary care emergency department physician wellness program.

IF 2.4
CJEM Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1007/s43678-025-00887-5
Matthew Lipinski, Eusang Ahn, Warren J Cheung, Stella Yiu
{"title":"Evaluating a Canadian tertiary care emergency department physician wellness program.","authors":"Matthew Lipinski, Eusang Ahn, Warren J Cheung, Stella Yiu","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-00887-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In response to increasing physician moral distress, the Department of Emergency Medicine at an academic, tertiary care hospital established a physician wellness program in 2018. We conducted a program evaluation at the 5-year mark which included the development of a program evaluation framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a utilization-focused logic model for the wellness program as per Van Melle. We identified inputs-outputs-outcomes and analyzed multiple data sources. These sources included qualitative and quantitative feedback from physicians, participation data from wellness initiatives, exit surveys, and engagement in departmental committees.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 5 years, the program periodically collected data on self-reported wellness of attending physicians along with participation data. In 2023, physicians ranked their occupational wellness at 5.93 on a 10-point Likert scale, with 58% highlighting supportive colleagues as their main protective factor and 42% identifying sequelae of emergency department crowding as a negative factor. Of survey respondents, 65% felt the program positively impacted their occupational wellness. Successful initiatives included public appreciation of physicians and creation of a \"process map\" to help guide physicians through a patient complaint. However, other initiatives such as wellness drop-in sessions were less successful.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While social events were appreciated, initiatives focusing on addressing barriers to occupational wellness were valued the most. This program evaluation and logic model guided the planning committee to emphasize enhancing occupational wellness, recognizing physician accomplishments, and improving patient relations. It served as an operational example for the development and implementation of a wellness program within a large, tertiary care emergency department. Other centers can implement similar activities to create or further enhance their wellness programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"395-399"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00887-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In response to increasing physician moral distress, the Department of Emergency Medicine at an academic, tertiary care hospital established a physician wellness program in 2018. We conducted a program evaluation at the 5-year mark which included the development of a program evaluation framework.

Methods: We used a utilization-focused logic model for the wellness program as per Van Melle. We identified inputs-outputs-outcomes and analyzed multiple data sources. These sources included qualitative and quantitative feedback from physicians, participation data from wellness initiatives, exit surveys, and engagement in departmental committees.

Results: Over 5 years, the program periodically collected data on self-reported wellness of attending physicians along with participation data. In 2023, physicians ranked their occupational wellness at 5.93 on a 10-point Likert scale, with 58% highlighting supportive colleagues as their main protective factor and 42% identifying sequelae of emergency department crowding as a negative factor. Of survey respondents, 65% felt the program positively impacted their occupational wellness. Successful initiatives included public appreciation of physicians and creation of a "process map" to help guide physicians through a patient complaint. However, other initiatives such as wellness drop-in sessions were less successful.

Conclusion: While social events were appreciated, initiatives focusing on addressing barriers to occupational wellness were valued the most. This program evaluation and logic model guided the planning committee to emphasize enhancing occupational wellness, recognizing physician accomplishments, and improving patient relations. It served as an operational example for the development and implementation of a wellness program within a large, tertiary care emergency department. Other centers can implement similar activities to create or further enhance their wellness programs.

评估加拿大三级护理急诊科医师健康计划。
目的:为了应对日益严重的医生道德困境,一家学术三级医院的急诊医学部于2018年建立了一个医生健康计划。我们在5年的时间里进行了项目评估,包括项目评估框架的制定。方法:我们根据Van Melle对健康计划使用了以利用率为中心的逻辑模型。我们确定了输入-输出-结果,并分析了多个数据源。这些来源包括来自医生的定性和定量反馈、健康倡议的参与数据、离职调查和部门委员会的参与情况。结果:在5年多的时间里,该项目定期收集主治医生自我报告的健康数据以及参与数据。2023年,医生给自己的职业健康评分为5.93分(李克特评分为10分),58%的医生强调同事的支持是他们的主要保护因素,42%的医生认为急诊科拥挤的后遗症是一个负面因素。在受访者中,65%的人认为该计划对他们的职业健康产生了积极影响。成功的举措包括公众对医生的赞赏和创建“流程图”,以帮助指导医生通过病人的投诉。然而,其他倡议,如健康旁听会议就不那么成功了。结论:虽然社会活动受到赞赏,但最重视的是解决职业健康障碍的举措。这个项目评估和逻辑模型指导规划委员会强调提高职业健康,认可医生的成就,改善患者关系。它为一个大型三级急诊部门的健康计划的发展和实施提供了一个操作范例。其他中心可以实施类似的活动来创建或进一步加强他们的健康计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信