Diagnostic stewardship of procalcitonin testing by implementation of computer-based decision support.

Gina M Belfiore, Christopher A Jankowski, Carmen L Isache, Scott Smith, Matthew Feldhammer
{"title":"Diagnostic stewardship of procalcitonin testing by implementation of computer-based decision support.","authors":"Gina M Belfiore, Christopher A Jankowski, Carmen L Isache, Scott Smith, Matthew Feldhammer","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmae108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Appropriate test utilization strategies are paramount in preventing the overuse of antibiotics, which can contribute to antimicrobial resistance. Biomarkers such as procalcitonin (PCT) are frequently ordered upon suspicion of infection, but current pneumonia and sepsis guidelines recommend against using PCT alone when initiating antibiotic therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of standardized, guideline-based computerized decision support in curbing the inappropriate ordering of PCT testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective, single-center cohort of hospitalized adult patients with at least 1 available PCT serum level over a 27-month period. Secondary outcomes included the total number of PCT orders, the number of days on antibiotics, and the appropriate antibiotic response rate based on the PCT result.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 300 patients met our inclusion criteria for this study. The rate of appropriate PCT ordering increased in the postimplementation group (2% vs 10%), with an increased rate of appropriate ordering in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (4.3% vs 18.4%) and no change in patients with sepsis (0% vs 3.3%). Overall, PCT orders dropped by 78% after implementation of decision support.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study demonstrated that the addition of guideline-based computerized clinical decision support increased the rate of diagnostic stewardship for PCT orders.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmae108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Appropriate test utilization strategies are paramount in preventing the overuse of antibiotics, which can contribute to antimicrobial resistance. Biomarkers such as procalcitonin (PCT) are frequently ordered upon suspicion of infection, but current pneumonia and sepsis guidelines recommend against using PCT alone when initiating antibiotic therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of standardized, guideline-based computerized decision support in curbing the inappropriate ordering of PCT testing.

Methods: This study was a retrospective, single-center cohort of hospitalized adult patients with at least 1 available PCT serum level over a 27-month period. Secondary outcomes included the total number of PCT orders, the number of days on antibiotics, and the appropriate antibiotic response rate based on the PCT result.

Results: A total of 300 patients met our inclusion criteria for this study. The rate of appropriate PCT ordering increased in the postimplementation group (2% vs 10%), with an increased rate of appropriate ordering in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (4.3% vs 18.4%) and no change in patients with sepsis (0% vs 3.3%). Overall, PCT orders dropped by 78% after implementation of decision support.

Discussion: This study demonstrated that the addition of guideline-based computerized clinical decision support increased the rate of diagnostic stewardship for PCT orders.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信