Does Extramural Vascular Invasion Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer?

Neal Bhutiani, Mahmoud Mg Yousef, Abdelrahman Mg Yousef, Emaan U Haque, George J Chang, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Brian K Bednarski, Y Nancy You, John Paul Shen, Abhineet Uppal
{"title":"Does Extramural Vascular Invasion Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer?","authors":"Neal Bhutiani, Mahmoud Mg Yousef, Abdelrahman Mg Yousef, Emaan U Haque, George J Chang, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Brian K Bednarski, Y Nancy You, John Paul Shen, Abhineet Uppal","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2025.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) is associated with distant recurrence after treatment of locogionally advanced rectal adenocarcinomas (LARCs), but its use as a marker for response to neoadjuvant therapy is less well understood. We examined the relationship between EMVI and tumor or nodal category downstaging after treatment of LARCs with neoadjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with EMVI categorized on initial staging pelvic MRI for LARC who underwent curative-intent surgery after neoadjuvant therapy at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2016 to 2022 were identified. Patients received either preoperative chemoradiation or total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). Associations between EMVI and demographic, radiologic, and clinicopathologic variables were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EMVI was associated with higher rates of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (46.2% vs. 27.8%, P = .001) and perineural invasion (PNI) (51.9% vs. 28.4%, P < .001) on final pathology. Patients with EMVI were more likely to have cT4 tumors (31.7% vs. 16.3%, P = .004) and cN+ status (86.8% vs. 66.3%, P = .001) and more likely to be treated with TNT rather than chemoradiation alone (62.3% vs. 41.9%, P = .005). EMVI was associated with a lower rate of pathologic complete or near-complete response (20.1% vs. 34.2%, P = .018), downstaging to ypT0-2 from cT3/4 tumors (14.9% vs. 44.4%, P = .0001), and downstaging to ypN0 from cN+ status (47.9% vs. 66.4%, P = .015).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rectal tumors with EMVI are more likely to have higher clinical stage, less likely to respond to neoadjuvant therapy despite increased use of TNT, and more likely to have high-risk features for recurrence. This suggests EMVI is a marker of disease with poorer response to neoadjuvant therapy. Disease biology should be strongly considered in treatment decision-making, and new treatment strategies are needed to improve disease response.</p>","PeriodicalId":93939,"journal":{"name":"Clinical colorectal cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical colorectal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2025.02.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) is associated with distant recurrence after treatment of locogionally advanced rectal adenocarcinomas (LARCs), but its use as a marker for response to neoadjuvant therapy is less well understood. We examined the relationship between EMVI and tumor or nodal category downstaging after treatment of LARCs with neoadjuvant therapy.

Methods: Patients with EMVI categorized on initial staging pelvic MRI for LARC who underwent curative-intent surgery after neoadjuvant therapy at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2016 to 2022 were identified. Patients received either preoperative chemoradiation or total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). Associations between EMVI and demographic, radiologic, and clinicopathologic variables were analyzed.

Results: EMVI was associated with higher rates of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (46.2% vs. 27.8%, P = .001) and perineural invasion (PNI) (51.9% vs. 28.4%, P < .001) on final pathology. Patients with EMVI were more likely to have cT4 tumors (31.7% vs. 16.3%, P = .004) and cN+ status (86.8% vs. 66.3%, P = .001) and more likely to be treated with TNT rather than chemoradiation alone (62.3% vs. 41.9%, P = .005). EMVI was associated with a lower rate of pathologic complete or near-complete response (20.1% vs. 34.2%, P = .018), downstaging to ypT0-2 from cT3/4 tumors (14.9% vs. 44.4%, P = .0001), and downstaging to ypN0 from cN+ status (47.9% vs. 66.4%, P = .015).

Conclusions: Rectal tumors with EMVI are more likely to have higher clinical stage, less likely to respond to neoadjuvant therapy despite increased use of TNT, and more likely to have high-risk features for recurrence. This suggests EMVI is a marker of disease with poorer response to neoadjuvant therapy. Disease biology should be strongly considered in treatment decision-making, and new treatment strategies are needed to improve disease response.

外血管侵袭能预测局部晚期直肠癌新辅助治疗的疗效吗?
外膜血管侵犯(EMVI)与局部进展期直肠腺癌(LARCs)治疗后远处复发有关,但其作为新辅助治疗反应的标志尚不清楚。我们研究了EMVI与LARCs接受新辅助治疗后肿瘤或淋巴结分期降低的关系。方法:选取2016年至2022年在MD安德森癌症中心接受新辅助治疗后进行治愈意图手术的EMVI患者,这些患者在LARC的初始期骨盆MRI分类。患者接受术前放化疗或全新辅助治疗(TNT)。分析EMVI与人口统计学、放射学和临床病理变量之间的关系。结果:EMVI与淋巴血管侵袭(LVI) (46.2% vs. 27.8%, P = 0.001)和周围神经侵袭(PNI) (51.9% vs. 28.4%, P < 0.001)相关。EMVI患者更容易出现cT4肿瘤(31.7% vs. 16.3%, P = 0.004)和cN+状态(86.8% vs. 66.3%, P = 0.001),更容易接受TNT治疗而不是单独放化疗(62.3% vs. 41.9%, P = 0.005)。EMVI与较低的病理完全或接近完全缓解率(20.1%对34.2%,P = 0.018)、从cT3/4肿瘤降期为ypT0-2(14.9%对44.4%,P = 0.0001)和从cN+状态降期为ypN0(47.9%对66.4%,P = 0.015)相关。结论:直肠EMVI肿瘤临床分期较高,尽管增加了TNT的使用,但对新辅助治疗的反应较低,更有可能具有复发的高危特征。这表明EMVI是对新辅助治疗反应较差的疾病的标志。在治疗决策中应充分考虑疾病生物学,并需要新的治疗策略来提高疾病反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信