Different intestinal ecological niches drive the divergent evolution of probiotics in the gut.

IF 5.1 Q1 ECOLOGY
ISME communications Pub Date : 2025-02-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/ismeco/ycaf023
Zhe Han, Denggao Huang, Xinlei Liu, Wenyao Ma, Weipeng Cui, Shuaiming Jiang, Dongyu Zhen, Jiachao Zhang
{"title":"Different intestinal ecological niches drive the divergent evolution of probiotics in the gut.","authors":"Zhe Han, Denggao Huang, Xinlei Liu, Wenyao Ma, Weipeng Cui, Shuaiming Jiang, Dongyu Zhen, Jiachao Zhang","doi":"10.1093/ismeco/ycaf023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previously, we described the divergent evolution of probiotics in the gut, which potentially compromises their health-promoting effects. Here, we employed a spatiotemporal multiomic approach to explore the distribution and evolutionary trends of the probiotic <i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i> HNU082 (Lp082) in specific-pathogen-free and monocolonized mouse models. Initially, after establishing the inherent differences in the gut microbiota between the small and large intestines, we observed that the small intestine served as the main site for Lp082 survival and colonization. Subsequently, we discovered that the small intestine was the sole site where Lp082 exhibited divergent evolution. Moreover, our research indicated that Lp082 had a more substantial impact on the small-intestinal microbiota than on the large-intestinal microbiota. Consequently, we observed a significantly greater number of closely associated species coevolving with Lp082 in the small intestine than in the large intestine. This suggests that Lp082 faced higher selective pressures within the small intestine, potentially leading to the emergence of a greater number of mutants. Our findings will contribute to the differentiated application of probiotics, enhancing their beneficial effects, and offer insights into the targeted domestication of probiotic strains.</p>","PeriodicalId":73516,"journal":{"name":"ISME communications","volume":"5 1","pages":"ycaf023"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11879351/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISME communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ismeco/ycaf023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previously, we described the divergent evolution of probiotics in the gut, which potentially compromises their health-promoting effects. Here, we employed a spatiotemporal multiomic approach to explore the distribution and evolutionary trends of the probiotic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum HNU082 (Lp082) in specific-pathogen-free and monocolonized mouse models. Initially, after establishing the inherent differences in the gut microbiota between the small and large intestines, we observed that the small intestine served as the main site for Lp082 survival and colonization. Subsequently, we discovered that the small intestine was the sole site where Lp082 exhibited divergent evolution. Moreover, our research indicated that Lp082 had a more substantial impact on the small-intestinal microbiota than on the large-intestinal microbiota. Consequently, we observed a significantly greater number of closely associated species coevolving with Lp082 in the small intestine than in the large intestine. This suggests that Lp082 faced higher selective pressures within the small intestine, potentially leading to the emergence of a greater number of mutants. Our findings will contribute to the differentiated application of probiotics, enhancing their beneficial effects, and offer insights into the targeted domestication of probiotic strains.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信