Methodology for Measurement in Vivo Ankle Joint Kinematics after Two Different Types of Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

Rea Ikeda, Hiroaki Kurokawa, Shinichi Kosugi, Yasuhito Tanaka, Masataka Yamamoto, Hiroshi Takemura
{"title":"Methodology for Measurement in Vivo Ankle Joint Kinematics after Two Different Types of Total Ankle Arthroplasty.","authors":"Rea Ikeda, Hiroaki Kurokawa, Shinichi Kosugi, Yasuhito Tanaka, Masataka Yamamoto, Hiroshi Takemura","doi":"10.1109/EMBC53108.2024.10782043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Revision surgery due to relatively high rates of loosening and implant subsidence is one of critical problems after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). In Japan, ahead of the world, two types of TAA with differently shaped alumina ceramic implants are being used in recently. For one type, Standard TAA, an analysis of ankle joint kinematics after replacement has been performed. However, the method is specific to its implant for standard TAA, and ankle joint kinematics after the other type, Combined TAA, has not been analyzed or compared in terms of kinematics. In addition, the previous method has critical issue of reproducibility because it includes manual processes. The purpose of this study is to develop in vivo kinematics analysis method of ankle joint after Standard TAA and Combined TAA that can be used to compare them. Definition of reference systems using common implant shapes features enabled kinematics analysis independent of its shape. Also, calculating ankle joint kinematics using iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm enabled a uniform analysis without any manual processes. The proposed method allows comparison of ankle joint kinematics after Standard TAA and Combined TAA with automatically and reproducibility. The analysis results may lead to the development of optimal implant shapes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72237,"journal":{"name":"Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference","volume":"2024 ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC53108.2024.10782043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Revision surgery due to relatively high rates of loosening and implant subsidence is one of critical problems after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). In Japan, ahead of the world, two types of TAA with differently shaped alumina ceramic implants are being used in recently. For one type, Standard TAA, an analysis of ankle joint kinematics after replacement has been performed. However, the method is specific to its implant for standard TAA, and ankle joint kinematics after the other type, Combined TAA, has not been analyzed or compared in terms of kinematics. In addition, the previous method has critical issue of reproducibility because it includes manual processes. The purpose of this study is to develop in vivo kinematics analysis method of ankle joint after Standard TAA and Combined TAA that can be used to compare them. Definition of reference systems using common implant shapes features enabled kinematics analysis independent of its shape. Also, calculating ankle joint kinematics using iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm enabled a uniform analysis without any manual processes. The proposed method allows comparison of ankle joint kinematics after Standard TAA and Combined TAA with automatically and reproducibility. The analysis results may lead to the development of optimal implant shapes.

两种不同类型全踝关节置换术后踝关节运动学测量方法。
由于相对较高的松动和假体下沉率,翻修手术是全踝关节置换术(TAA)后的关键问题之一。在世界领先的日本,最近正在使用两种不同形状的氧化铝陶瓷植入物的TAA。对于一种类型,标准TAA,进行了踝关节置换后的运动学分析。然而,对于标准TAA,该方法是针对其植入物的,并且在另一种类型的联合TAA之后,踝关节的运动学尚未进行分析或比较。此外,由于前一种方法包含手动过程,因此存在再现性的关键问题。本研究的目的是建立标准TAA和联合TAA后踝关节的体内运动学分析方法,并对其进行比较。使用常见植入物形状特征定义参考系统,使运动学分析独立于其形状。此外,使用迭代最近点(ICP)算法计算踝关节运动学,无需任何手动过程即可进行统一分析。所提出的方法可以比较标准TAA和组合TAA后的踝关节运动学,具有自动和可重复性。分析结果可以指导最佳种植体形状的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信