Evaluating Poison Control Center Telemedicine Support for Health Care Facilities in Managing Overdose and Suicide During COVID-19.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2025.0003
Priyanka Vakkalanka, Eliezer Santos-Léon, Zachary Case, Victor A Soupene, Daniel J McCabe
{"title":"Evaluating Poison Control Center Telemedicine Support for Health Care Facilities in Managing Overdose and Suicide During COVID-19.","authors":"Priyanka Vakkalanka, Eliezer Santos-Léon, Zachary Case, Victor A Soupene, Daniel J McCabe","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2025.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> We aimed to assess differences in the impact of the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) on urban and rural health care facility (HCF) management of intentional overdoses and self-harm using telemedicine consultation from poison control centers (PCCs). <b>Methods:</b> We utilized a mixed-methods, explanatory study design of poison centers in the United States. The primary exposures were geography (urban vs. rural HCFs) and time (the pre-COVID-19 PHE [January 1, 2018-March 10, 2020] vs. COVID-19 PHE [March 11, 2020-December 31, 2022]). The primary outcomes were patient disposition: admission to critical care unit (CCU); non-CCU; or psychiatric facility. We measured these associations using a multinomial regression, adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. We interviewed PCC staff to gain insight about perspectives of PCC staff in managing intentional overdoses. <b>Results:</b> Of the 1,416,809 intentional overdoses identified, 1,313,704 (93%) were included in our analysis. Compared with urban HCFs in the pre-COVID-19 era, CCU admissions were greater among rural HCFs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-1.14); however, they were lower in the COVID-19 PHE era within rural (aOR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.71-0.73) and urban HCFs (aOR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.73-0.75). Trends were similar in non-CCU and psychiatric admissions. We identified four themes: challenges of admitting overdose cases; changes in calls related to COVID-19 and intentional overdoses; changes in technology, staffing, and operations to adapt to the COVID-19 PHE; and changes in communications for telemedicine. <b>Conclusions:</b> The COVID-19 PHE introduced challenges for urban and rural HCFs in treating mental health and overdoses. PCCs are a vital source of telemedicine support available to both urban and rural clinical providers to ease the existing health care burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":"808-820"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2025.0003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We aimed to assess differences in the impact of the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) on urban and rural health care facility (HCF) management of intentional overdoses and self-harm using telemedicine consultation from poison control centers (PCCs). Methods: We utilized a mixed-methods, explanatory study design of poison centers in the United States. The primary exposures were geography (urban vs. rural HCFs) and time (the pre-COVID-19 PHE [January 1, 2018-March 10, 2020] vs. COVID-19 PHE [March 11, 2020-December 31, 2022]). The primary outcomes were patient disposition: admission to critical care unit (CCU); non-CCU; or psychiatric facility. We measured these associations using a multinomial regression, adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. We interviewed PCC staff to gain insight about perspectives of PCC staff in managing intentional overdoses. Results: Of the 1,416,809 intentional overdoses identified, 1,313,704 (93%) were included in our analysis. Compared with urban HCFs in the pre-COVID-19 era, CCU admissions were greater among rural HCFs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-1.14); however, they were lower in the COVID-19 PHE era within rural (aOR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.71-0.73) and urban HCFs (aOR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.73-0.75). Trends were similar in non-CCU and psychiatric admissions. We identified four themes: challenges of admitting overdose cases; changes in calls related to COVID-19 and intentional overdoses; changes in technology, staffing, and operations to adapt to the COVID-19 PHE; and changes in communications for telemedicine. Conclusions: The COVID-19 PHE introduced challenges for urban and rural HCFs in treating mental health and overdoses. PCCs are a vital source of telemedicine support available to both urban and rural clinical providers to ease the existing health care burden.

评估中毒控制中心远程医疗对医疗机构在COVID-19期间管理用药过量和自杀的支持。
背景:我们旨在评估2019冠状病毒病突发公共卫生事件(PHE)对城乡卫生保健机构(HCF)使用中毒控制中心(PCCs)远程医疗咨询管理故意过量用药和自残的影响差异。方法:我们采用了美国中毒中心的混合方法,解释性研究设计。主要暴露是地理(城市与农村hcf)和时间(2019冠状病毒病前PHE[2018年1月1日- 2020年3月10日]与2019冠状病毒病PHE[2020年3月11日- 2022年12月31日])。主要结局是患者倾向:入住重症监护病房(CCU);non-CCU;或者精神病院。我们使用多项回归测量了这些关联,调整了人口统计学和临床因素。我们采访了PCC的工作人员,以了解PCC工作人员在管理故意过量用药方面的观点。结果:在确定的1,416,809例故意过量用药中,1,313,704例(93%)纳入了我们的分析。与前covid -19时代的城市hcf患者相比,农村hcf患者CCU入院率更高(调整后优势比[aOR]: 1.12;95%置信区间[CI]: 1.10-1.14);然而,在农村地区,它们在COVID-19 PHE时代较低(aOR: 0.72;95% CI: 0.71-0.73)和城市HCFs (aOR: 0.74;95% ci: 0.73-0.75)。非ccu和精神科住院的趋势相似。我们确定了四个主题:承认过量病例的挑战;与COVID-19和故意过量用药有关的电话变化;技术、人员配置和运营方面的变化,以适应COVID-19 PHE;以及远程医疗通信的变化。结论:COVID-19 PHE给城市和农村hcf在治疗精神健康和过量用药方面带来了挑战。PCCs是城市和农村临床提供者可获得的远程医疗支持的重要来源,以减轻现有的卫生保健负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信