A scoping review of children's and parents' attitudes to and awareness of digital food marketing.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Elena Vaughan, Magdalena Muc Da Encarnacao, Eimer Brown, Olivia Nealon Lennox, Colette Kelly, Mimi Tatlow-Golden
{"title":"A scoping review of children's and parents' attitudes to and awareness of digital food marketing.","authors":"Elena Vaughan, Magdalena Muc Da Encarnacao, Eimer Brown, Olivia Nealon Lennox, Colette Kelly, Mimi Tatlow-Golden","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daae189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digital food marketing (DFM) of unhealthy foods and beverages (high in saturated fats, sugar and salt) to children and young people influences brand recall, recognition, purchase intentions and attitudes, and increases consumption of unhealthy foods and beverages. Understanding children's and parents' awareness of, and attitudes toward, such marketing is crucial for developing health-promoting advocacy and policy solutions. This registered systematic scoping review synthesized literature on children's, young people's and parents' attitudes and awareness of DFM. A structured search of Medline, PsycInfo, Academic Search Complete (Ebscohost), Scopus and CINAHL was conducted. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed studies focused on children (<18 years), young people (<24 years) or parents, published after 2000, examining attitudes or awareness of online marketing of food or non-alcoholic beverages. Data were extracted and charted in Excel. Forty studies were included for synthesis. Studies of children/young people (n = 31) show varying levels of awareness regarding DFM on social media and other digital media. While some understand social media marketing tactics, others struggle to recognize ads. Preferences lean towards influencer marketing and 'native' advertising styles. There is limited evidence on parents' views (n = 9 studies), but these suggest low parental awareness of digital marketing tactics targeting children, and unclear opinions on regulation. Overall, the findings suggest a need for a versatile, trans-disciplinary research and advocacy agenda to capture the complex and rapidly evolving digital marketing landscape, enhance critical digital literacies (including power inequalities) for both children and parents, increase knowledge-sharing and advocacy, and develop regulatory policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"40 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11879646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital food marketing (DFM) of unhealthy foods and beverages (high in saturated fats, sugar and salt) to children and young people influences brand recall, recognition, purchase intentions and attitudes, and increases consumption of unhealthy foods and beverages. Understanding children's and parents' awareness of, and attitudes toward, such marketing is crucial for developing health-promoting advocacy and policy solutions. This registered systematic scoping review synthesized literature on children's, young people's and parents' attitudes and awareness of DFM. A structured search of Medline, PsycInfo, Academic Search Complete (Ebscohost), Scopus and CINAHL was conducted. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed studies focused on children (<18 years), young people (<24 years) or parents, published after 2000, examining attitudes or awareness of online marketing of food or non-alcoholic beverages. Data were extracted and charted in Excel. Forty studies were included for synthesis. Studies of children/young people (n = 31) show varying levels of awareness regarding DFM on social media and other digital media. While some understand social media marketing tactics, others struggle to recognize ads. Preferences lean towards influencer marketing and 'native' advertising styles. There is limited evidence on parents' views (n = 9 studies), but these suggest low parental awareness of digital marketing tactics targeting children, and unclear opinions on regulation. Overall, the findings suggest a need for a versatile, trans-disciplinary research and advocacy agenda to capture the complex and rapidly evolving digital marketing landscape, enhance critical digital literacies (including power inequalities) for both children and parents, increase knowledge-sharing and advocacy, and develop regulatory policies.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion International
Health Promotion International Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信