Exploring health literacy development through co-design: understanding the expectations for health literacy mediators.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Madeline Spencer, Vaughan Cruickshank, Nenagh Kemp, Rosie Nash
{"title":"Exploring health literacy development through co-design: understanding the expectations for health literacy mediators.","authors":"Madeline Spencer, Vaughan Cruickshank, Nenagh Kemp, Rosie Nash","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daaf003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health promotion efforts that enhance health literacy among individuals, organizations, and communities are gaining attention globally. Additionally, co-designed and community-led health promotion interventions have gained recognition as an effective strategy for addressing health issues through more effective and sustainable health outcomes. This qualitative study conducted in Tasmania, Australia, aimed to co-design the emerging Health Literacy Mediator (HLM) and to assess the support, expectations, and need for such a role. Following an Ophelia approach, data for this research were collected via focus group discussions within an online workshop, enabling diverse perspectives to emerge and be analysed via thematic analysis. Discussions around how the role could impact the individuals and families presented in the short case scenarios (vignettes) produced four strong expectations: that they are solution-focused, that they have a duty to facilitate change, that the role is based in community, and that the role targets those in the community who need them most to ensure the greatest impact. Participants also shared other recommendations and supporting ideas for the role. The potential role of HLM holds substantial promise in addressing health inequities for all individuals, regardless of background or socioeconomic status, by optimizing time management, simplifying navigation, ensuring the right care, and building community trust. By creating connections and advocating for individuals, HLMs could effectively break down barriers to healthcare access. This proactive approach not only addresses immediate health concerns but could also lay the groundwork for sustained improvements in public health outcomes in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11879027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health promotion efforts that enhance health literacy among individuals, organizations, and communities are gaining attention globally. Additionally, co-designed and community-led health promotion interventions have gained recognition as an effective strategy for addressing health issues through more effective and sustainable health outcomes. This qualitative study conducted in Tasmania, Australia, aimed to co-design the emerging Health Literacy Mediator (HLM) and to assess the support, expectations, and need for such a role. Following an Ophelia approach, data for this research were collected via focus group discussions within an online workshop, enabling diverse perspectives to emerge and be analysed via thematic analysis. Discussions around how the role could impact the individuals and families presented in the short case scenarios (vignettes) produced four strong expectations: that they are solution-focused, that they have a duty to facilitate change, that the role is based in community, and that the role targets those in the community who need them most to ensure the greatest impact. Participants also shared other recommendations and supporting ideas for the role. The potential role of HLM holds substantial promise in addressing health inequities for all individuals, regardless of background or socioeconomic status, by optimizing time management, simplifying navigation, ensuring the right care, and building community trust. By creating connections and advocating for individuals, HLMs could effectively break down barriers to healthcare access. This proactive approach not only addresses immediate health concerns but could also lay the groundwork for sustained improvements in public health outcomes in the future.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion International
Health Promotion International Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信