Expectations of healthcare AI and the role of trust: understanding patient views on how AI will impact cost, access, and patient-provider relationships.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Paige Nong, Molin Ji
{"title":"Expectations of healthcare AI and the role of trust: understanding patient views on how AI will impact cost, access, and patient-provider relationships.","authors":"Paige Nong, Molin Ji","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocaf031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although efforts to effectively govern AI continue to develop, relatively little work has been done to systematically measure and include patient perspectives or expectations of AI in governance. This analysis is designed to understand patient expectations of healthcare AI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Cross-sectional nationally representative survey of US adults fielded from June to July of 2023. A total of 2039 participants completed the survey and cross-sectional population weights were applied to produce national estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among US adults, 19.55% expect AI to improve their relationship with their doctor, while 19.4% expect it to increase affordability and 30.28% expect it will improve their access to care. Trust in providers and the healthcare system are positively associated with expectations of AI when controlling for demographic factors, general attitudes toward technology, and other healthcare-related variables.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>US adults generally have low expectations of benefit from AI in healthcare, but those with higher trust in their providers and health systems are more likely to expect to benefit from AI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trust and provider relationships should be key considerations for health systems as they create their AI governance processes and communicate with patients about AI tools. Evidence of patient benefit should be prioritized to preserve or promote trust.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":"795-799"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12012342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Although efforts to effectively govern AI continue to develop, relatively little work has been done to systematically measure and include patient perspectives or expectations of AI in governance. This analysis is designed to understand patient expectations of healthcare AI.

Materials and methods: Cross-sectional nationally representative survey of US adults fielded from June to July of 2023. A total of 2039 participants completed the survey and cross-sectional population weights were applied to produce national estimates.

Results: Among US adults, 19.55% expect AI to improve their relationship with their doctor, while 19.4% expect it to increase affordability and 30.28% expect it will improve their access to care. Trust in providers and the healthcare system are positively associated with expectations of AI when controlling for demographic factors, general attitudes toward technology, and other healthcare-related variables.

Discussion: US adults generally have low expectations of benefit from AI in healthcare, but those with higher trust in their providers and health systems are more likely to expect to benefit from AI.

Conclusion: Trust and provider relationships should be key considerations for health systems as they create their AI governance processes and communicate with patients about AI tools. Evidence of patient benefit should be prioritized to preserve or promote trust.

对医疗人工智能的期望和信任的作用:了解患者对人工智能将如何影响成本、访问和医患关系的看法。
目标:尽管有效治理人工智能的努力仍在继续发展,但在系统地衡量和包括患者对治理中人工智能的观点或期望方面所做的工作相对较少。该分析旨在了解患者对医疗保健人工智能的期望。材料和方法:2023年6月至7月对美国成年人进行的全国代表性横断面调查。共有2039名参与者完成了调查,并采用横断面人口权重来产生全国估计数。结果:在美国成年人中,19.55%的人希望人工智能能改善他们与医生的关系,19.4%的人希望人工智能能提高他们的负担能力,30.28%的人希望人工智能能改善他们获得医疗服务的机会。在控制人口因素、对技术的普遍态度和其他医疗保健相关变量的情况下,对提供者和医疗保健系统的信任与对人工智能的期望呈正相关。讨论:美国成年人普遍对人工智能在医疗保健领域的受益期望较低,但那些对医疗服务提供者和医疗系统信任度较高的人更有可能期望从人工智能中受益。结论:在卫生系统创建人工智能治理流程并与患者就人工智能工具进行沟通时,信任和提供者关系应成为关键考虑因素。应优先考虑患者受益的证据,以维护或促进信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信