Assessing parental stress and self-efficacy: A multisite feasibility study of parent-mediated physical activity interventions for children with developmental disabilities.

IF 2.8 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Promotion Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-12-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.34172/hpp.43108
Luis Columna, Scott McNamarra, Beth A Myers, Nienke Dosa, Ashlyn Barry, Kristi Roth, Christine E Ashby, Byungmo Ku, Timothy Davis, Nikkia Borowski, Lisa M Hooper
{"title":"Assessing parental stress and self-efficacy: A multisite feasibility study of parent-mediated physical activity interventions for children with developmental disabilities.","authors":"Luis Columna, Scott McNamarra, Beth A Myers, Nienke Dosa, Ashlyn Barry, Kristi Roth, Christine E Ashby, Byungmo Ku, Timothy Davis, Nikkia Borowski, Lisa M Hooper","doi":"10.34172/hpp.43108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children with developmental disabilities often face barriers to engaging in physical activity (PA), impacting their health and quality of life. Parent-mediated interventions (PMIs) have shown promise to reduce these barriers, but little research explores online PMIs for parents of children with developmental disabilities. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and impact of a multi-site collaborative online parent-mediated PA intervention on stress levels and self-efficacy among parents of children with developmental disabilities over a 12-week period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (n=55) were parents of children with developmental disabilities, randomly assigned to intervention (n=27) or control (n=28) groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recruitment rate was 58%, with an 80% retention rate. The feasibility of online delivery was demonstrated, allowing participation from various locations. An analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) with parental sex and education level as covariates revealed no significant interaction effect between group and time for parenting self-efficacy score (PSE), F(1, 104)=0.118, <i>P</i>=0.732, or PSI, F(1, 104)=0.196, <i>P</i>=0.659. The mean PSI difference (pre-post) was -0.38 (CI: -10.57 to 9.80) for the experimental group and 2.64 (CI: -9.61 to 14.91) for the control group, while the mean PSE difference was -4.41 (CI: -29.33 to 20.49) and 4.75 (CI: -23.22 to 32.73), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future research should explore the integration of hybrid PMIs in conjunction with qualitative measures to facilitate a deeper understanding of the multifaceted factors influencing parental engagement in PA interventions for children with developmental disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":46588,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Perspectives","volume":"14 4","pages":"350-359"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873769/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.43108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children with developmental disabilities often face barriers to engaging in physical activity (PA), impacting their health and quality of life. Parent-mediated interventions (PMIs) have shown promise to reduce these barriers, but little research explores online PMIs for parents of children with developmental disabilities. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and impact of a multi-site collaborative online parent-mediated PA intervention on stress levels and self-efficacy among parents of children with developmental disabilities over a 12-week period.

Methods: Participants (n=55) were parents of children with developmental disabilities, randomly assigned to intervention (n=27) or control (n=28) groups.

Results: Recruitment rate was 58%, with an 80% retention rate. The feasibility of online delivery was demonstrated, allowing participation from various locations. An analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) with parental sex and education level as covariates revealed no significant interaction effect between group and time for parenting self-efficacy score (PSE), F(1, 104)=0.118, P=0.732, or PSI, F(1, 104)=0.196, P=0.659. The mean PSI difference (pre-post) was -0.38 (CI: -10.57 to 9.80) for the experimental group and 2.64 (CI: -9.61 to 14.91) for the control group, while the mean PSE difference was -4.41 (CI: -29.33 to 20.49) and 4.75 (CI: -23.22 to 32.73), respectively.

Conclusion: Future research should explore the integration of hybrid PMIs in conjunction with qualitative measures to facilitate a deeper understanding of the multifaceted factors influencing parental engagement in PA interventions for children with developmental disabilities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估父母压力和自我效能:一项多地点的可行性研究:父母介导的身体活动干预对发育障碍儿童的影响。
背景:发育性残疾儿童经常面临从事体育活动(PA)的障碍,影响他们的健康和生活质量。父母介导的干预(pmi)已显示出减少这些障碍的希望,但很少有研究探讨在线pmi对发育障碍儿童父母的影响。因此,本研究的目的是评估多站点协作在线父母介导的PA干预对发育障碍儿童父母压力水平和自我效能感的可行性和影响,为期12周。方法:参与者(n=55)为发育障碍儿童的父母,随机分为干预组(n=27)和对照组(n=28)。结果:入职率58%,留职率80%。演示了在线交付的可行性,允许来自不同地点的参与者。以父母性别和受教育程度为协变量进行协方差分析(ANCOVA),结果显示,群体和时间对父母自我效能评分(PSE)无显著交互作用,F(1,104)=0.118, P=0.732, PSI, F(1,104)=0.196, P=0.659。实验组PSI(前后)平均差值为-0.38 (CI: -10.57 ~ 9.80),对照组PSI(前后)平均差值为2.64 (CI: -9.61 ~ 14.91), PSE(前后)平均差值分别为-4.41 (CI: -29.33 ~ 20.49)和4.75 (CI: -23.22 ~ 32.73)。结论:未来的研究应探索将混合pmi与定性测量相结合,以更深入地了解影响父母参与发育障碍儿童PA干预的多方面因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Perspectives
Health Promotion Perspectives PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信