Evaluation of Influenza Vaccine Clinical Decision Support Systems Bundle for Hospitalized Children.

Q1 Nursing
Swaminathan Kandaswamy, Erin Masterson, Reena Blanco, Patricia Lantis, Thomas E Dawson, Edwin Ray, Christy Bryant, Srikant Iyer, Andi L Shane, Stephanie Jernigan, Evan W Orenstein
{"title":"Evaluation of Influenza Vaccine Clinical Decision Support Systems Bundle for Hospitalized Children.","authors":"Swaminathan Kandaswamy, Erin Masterson, Reena Blanco, Patricia Lantis, Thomas E Dawson, Edwin Ray, Christy Bryant, Srikant Iyer, Andi L Shane, Stephanie Jernigan, Evan W Orenstein","doi":"10.1542/hpeds.2024-008099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospitalized children are at increased risk of influenza-related complications; however, influenza vaccine coverage remains low among this group. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of a suite of clinical decision support (CDS) strategies to improve inpatient influenza vaccination in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted this retrospective cohort study among hospitalized children eligible for the seasonal influenza vaccine. We evaluated the influence of various CDS strategies on influenza vaccine administration rates from September 1, 2018, through May 1, 2022, using mixed-effects logistic regression adjusting for influenza season and demographic factors. In addition to our original CDS (prechecked influenza vaccine order in admission order sets), we designed and implemented 2 additional novel CDS tools, ie, vaccine status notifications and a conditional discharge alert on a patient who had an order without influenza vaccination administration, which were implemented using a sequential crossover design from control to intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 46 706 eligible hospitalizations across the 4 influenza seasons. In multivariable analysis, all 3 CDS interventions significantly improved influenza vaccine rates compared to those who did not receive any intervention (influenza vaccine order group: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.28, 95% CI: 2.14-2.42; conditional discharge alert: aOR 1.82, 95% CI: 1.56-2.12; vaccine status notifications: aOR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.04-1.37). Vaccination was highest in the 2019 to 2020 influenza season, with falling rates in the subsequent years (2021-2022 season: aOR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.28-0.40).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CDS improved influenza vaccination rates in hospitalized children. However, decreased rates over time may indicate waning CDS effectiveness or external factors such as COVID-19, as well as increased vaccine hesitancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":38180,"journal":{"name":"Hospital pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"351-359"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2024-008099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospitalized children are at increased risk of influenza-related complications; however, influenza vaccine coverage remains low among this group. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of a suite of clinical decision support (CDS) strategies to improve inpatient influenza vaccination in children.

Methods: We conducted this retrospective cohort study among hospitalized children eligible for the seasonal influenza vaccine. We evaluated the influence of various CDS strategies on influenza vaccine administration rates from September 1, 2018, through May 1, 2022, using mixed-effects logistic regression adjusting for influenza season and demographic factors. In addition to our original CDS (prechecked influenza vaccine order in admission order sets), we designed and implemented 2 additional novel CDS tools, ie, vaccine status notifications and a conditional discharge alert on a patient who had an order without influenza vaccination administration, which were implemented using a sequential crossover design from control to intervention.

Results: There were 46 706 eligible hospitalizations across the 4 influenza seasons. In multivariable analysis, all 3 CDS interventions significantly improved influenza vaccine rates compared to those who did not receive any intervention (influenza vaccine order group: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.28, 95% CI: 2.14-2.42; conditional discharge alert: aOR 1.82, 95% CI: 1.56-2.12; vaccine status notifications: aOR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.04-1.37). Vaccination was highest in the 2019 to 2020 influenza season, with falling rates in the subsequent years (2021-2022 season: aOR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.28-0.40).

Conclusions: CDS improved influenza vaccination rates in hospitalized children. However, decreased rates over time may indicate waning CDS effectiveness or external factors such as COVID-19, as well as increased vaccine hesitancy.

住院儿童流感疫苗临床决策支持系统的评估。
背景:住院儿童发生流感相关并发症的风险增加;然而,这一群体的流感疫苗覆盖率仍然很低。我们的目的是评估一套临床决策支持(CDS)策略的有效性,以改善住院儿童的流感疫苗接种。方法:我们在符合季节性流感疫苗接种条件的住院儿童中进行了回顾性队列研究。我们评估了2018年9月1日至2022年5月1日期间各种CDS策略对流感疫苗接种率的影响,采用混合效应logistic回归调整流感季节和人口统计学因素。除了我们最初的CDS(入院单中预先检查的流感疫苗订单),我们设计并实施了另外两个新的CDS工具,即疫苗状态通知和对未接种流感疫苗的患者的有条件出院警报,这是通过从对照到干预的顺序交叉设计实施的。结果:4个流感季节共有46 706例符合条件的住院病例。在多变量分析中,与未接受任何干预的患者相比,所有3种CDS干预均显著提高了流感疫苗接种率(流感疫苗顺序组:调整优势比[aOR] 2.28, 95% CI: 2.14-2.42;条件放电警报:aOR 1.82, 95% CI: 1.56-2.12;疫苗状态通知:aOR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.04-1.37)。疫苗接种率在2019 - 2020年流感季节最高,随后几年接种率下降(2021-2022年流感季节:aOR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.28-0.40)。结论:CDS提高了住院儿童的流感疫苗接种率。然而,随着时间的推移,感染率下降可能表明CDS有效性减弱或COVID-19等外部因素,以及疫苗犹豫性增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital pediatrics
Hospital pediatrics Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信