A pragmatic multi-setting healthy lifestyle intervention to improve BMI status in a middle-income population: A potential strategy for individuals at risk.
IF 2.4 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
{"title":"A pragmatic multi-setting healthy lifestyle intervention to improve BMI status in a middle-income population: A potential strategy for individuals at risk.","authors":"Reza Yari-Boroujeni, Leila Cheraghi, Parnian Parvin, Fatemeh Shiravi, Hasti Masihay-Akbar, Amirabbas Momenan, Arash Ghanbarian, Parvin Mirmiran, Davood Khalili, Fereidoun Azizi, Parisa Amiri","doi":"10.34172/hpp.43196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate a multi-setting lifestyle intervention's effect on body mass index (BMI) across the entire spectrum in a middle-income adult population over 15 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pragmatic interventional study included 5153 adults (≥20 years) from a middle-income community, followed for over 15 years with five follow-ups. A multi-setting intervention (school, family, community) aimed to promote healthy lifestyles. The lambda-mu sigma (LMS) method and quantile regression model were used to analyze changes in BMI percentiles (10<sup>th</sup>-90<sup>th</sup>) by sex and intervention group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention showed modest effects on BMI percentiles. In men, it lowered BMI at the 40<sup>th</sup> and 70<sup>th</sup> percentiles (overweight/obesity onset) at the first follow-up (β=-0.16, 95% CI: -0.33, -0.001 and β=-0.21, 95% CI: -0.38, -0.04 respectively). In women, the effect emerged later (second follow-up) at the 20<sup>th</sup> (β=-0.39, 95% CI: -0.60, -0.18), 30<sup>th</sup> (β=-0.27, 95% CI: -0.49, -0.04), and 60<sup>th</sup> (β=-0.20, 95% CI: -0.39, -0.02) percentiles (overweight risk), extending to more overweight percentiles (20<sup>th</sup>-50<sup>th</sup>) in the third follow-up (βs ranged from -0.28 until -0.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicated the effectiveness of a practical lifestyle intervention to control rising trend of BMI at the onset of overweight and obesity in a middle-income population. These findings can be useful for planning obesity prevention programs in communities with similar socioeconomic statuses.</p>","PeriodicalId":46588,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Perspectives","volume":"14 4","pages":"369-379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.43196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To evaluate a multi-setting lifestyle intervention's effect on body mass index (BMI) across the entire spectrum in a middle-income adult population over 15 years.
Methods: This pragmatic interventional study included 5153 adults (≥20 years) from a middle-income community, followed for over 15 years with five follow-ups. A multi-setting intervention (school, family, community) aimed to promote healthy lifestyles. The lambda-mu sigma (LMS) method and quantile regression model were used to analyze changes in BMI percentiles (10th-90th) by sex and intervention group.
Results: The intervention showed modest effects on BMI percentiles. In men, it lowered BMI at the 40th and 70th percentiles (overweight/obesity onset) at the first follow-up (β=-0.16, 95% CI: -0.33, -0.001 and β=-0.21, 95% CI: -0.38, -0.04 respectively). In women, the effect emerged later (second follow-up) at the 20th (β=-0.39, 95% CI: -0.60, -0.18), 30th (β=-0.27, 95% CI: -0.49, -0.04), and 60th (β=-0.20, 95% CI: -0.39, -0.02) percentiles (overweight risk), extending to more overweight percentiles (20th-50th) in the third follow-up (βs ranged from -0.28 until -0.26).
Conclusion: Our results indicated the effectiveness of a practical lifestyle intervention to control rising trend of BMI at the onset of overweight and obesity in a middle-income population. These findings can be useful for planning obesity prevention programs in communities with similar socioeconomic statuses.