Using a deterministic matching computer routine to identify hospital episodes in a Brazilian de-identified administrative database for the analysis of obstetrics hospitalisations.

IF 2.2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
International Journal of Population Data Science Pub Date : 2025-03-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.23889/ijpds.v10i1.2467
Claudia Medina Coeli, Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues, Lana Meijinhos, Daniela Medina Coeli Bastos, Rejane Sobrino Pinheiro, Valeria Saraceni, Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias, Natália Santana Paiva, Kenneth Rochel de Camargo
{"title":"Using a deterministic matching computer routine to identify hospital episodes in a Brazilian de-identified administrative database for the analysis of obstetrics hospitalisations.","authors":"Claudia Medina Coeli, Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues, Lana Meijinhos, Daniela Medina Coeli Bastos, Rejane Sobrino Pinheiro, Valeria Saraceni, Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias, Natália Santana Paiva, Kenneth Rochel de Camargo","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v10i1.2467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The absence of a unique patient identifier in the Brazilian hospital administrative database prevents the identification of hospital episodes with multiple hospitalisations of the same patient.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the information gain by using a computer routine to identify acute Obstetrics hospital episodes and its impact on assessing marks of case severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data source was a de-identified Brazilian hospital administrative database from 2017 to 2020, including hospitalisations records of women of reproductive age (10 to 49 years old) for treating acute conditions (N=16,087,490). We processed this database by combining C++ and Python routines to create a hospital episodes database. From the latter, we selected obstetrics hospital episodes from 2018 to 2019 (N = 4,926,877). We compared selected characteristics of the hospital episodes according to their type (multiple vs single records per episode), testing for differences using effect size measures. We compared relative differences in case severity marks when using the hospital episode as the unit of analysis to that of isolated hospitalisations (N = 5,018,350).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to single-record episodes, multiple-records episodes had longer length of stay, higher amount reimbursed, and lower proportion of discharge alive. When comparing isolated hospitalisations to hospital episodes analysis, we observed an increase in all case severity indicators, especially for hospital deaths, with an increment of 13.15%. The computer routine decreased the hospital admissions with a reason for hospital discharge that did not indicate the outcome (hospital stay or inter-hospital transfer) from 2.29% to 0.73.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The deterministic matching computer routine proved valuable for identifying records that refer to the same hospital episode, which improved the assessment of severe cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"2467"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v10i1.2467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The absence of a unique patient identifier in the Brazilian hospital administrative database prevents the identification of hospital episodes with multiple hospitalisations of the same patient.

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the information gain by using a computer routine to identify acute Obstetrics hospital episodes and its impact on assessing marks of case severity.

Methods: The data source was a de-identified Brazilian hospital administrative database from 2017 to 2020, including hospitalisations records of women of reproductive age (10 to 49 years old) for treating acute conditions (N=16,087,490). We processed this database by combining C++ and Python routines to create a hospital episodes database. From the latter, we selected obstetrics hospital episodes from 2018 to 2019 (N = 4,926,877). We compared selected characteristics of the hospital episodes according to their type (multiple vs single records per episode), testing for differences using effect size measures. We compared relative differences in case severity marks when using the hospital episode as the unit of analysis to that of isolated hospitalisations (N = 5,018,350).

Results: Compared to single-record episodes, multiple-records episodes had longer length of stay, higher amount reimbursed, and lower proportion of discharge alive. When comparing isolated hospitalisations to hospital episodes analysis, we observed an increase in all case severity indicators, especially for hospital deaths, with an increment of 13.15%. The computer routine decreased the hospital admissions with a reason for hospital discharge that did not indicate the outcome (hospital stay or inter-hospital transfer) from 2.29% to 0.73.

Conclusions: The deterministic matching computer routine proved valuable for identifying records that refer to the same hospital episode, which improved the assessment of severe cases.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用确定性匹配计算机程序在巴西去识别管理数据库中识别医院事件,用于分析产科住院情况。
简介:巴西医院管理数据库中缺乏唯一的患者标识符,因此无法识别同一患者多次住院的医院事件。目的:本研究旨在评估使用计算机常规识别产科医院急性发作的信息获取及其对评估病例严重程度标志的影响。方法:数据来源为2017年至2020年巴西医院管理数据库,包括育龄妇女(10至49岁)治疗急性疾病的住院记录(N=16,087,490)。我们通过结合c++和Python例程来处理这个数据库,创建了一个医院集数据库。从后者中,我们选择2018 - 2019年产科医院事件(N = 4,926,877)。我们根据类型比较了医院发作的选定特征(每次发作有多个或单个记录),使用效应量测量来检验差异。我们比较了使用医院事件作为分析单位与孤立住院的病例严重程度标记的相对差异(N = 5,018,350)。结果:与单病历相比,多病历的住院时间更长,报销金额更高,出院存活率更低。当将孤立住院与医院事件分析进行比较时,我们观察到所有病例严重程度指标的增加,特别是医院死亡,增加了13.15%。计算机程序将没有表明结果(住院或医院间转院)的出院原因的住院率从2.29%降低到0.73。结论:确定性匹配计算机程序在识别同一医院事件的记录方面证明是有价值的,这改善了重症病例的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
386
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信