Assessing pet owners' knowledge and comprehension of veterinary medical terminology.

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Camilla Piazza, Lluís Dominguez Cots, Charlotte Dye
{"title":"Assessing pet owners' knowledge and comprehension of veterinary medical terminology.","authors":"Camilla Piazza, Lluís Dominguez Cots, Charlotte Dye","doi":"10.1002/vetr.5163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Veterinary communication plays a key role in client satisfaction, patient outcomes and clinician wellbeing. Communication assessment tools can help to facilitate improvement strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a 5-month period, pet owners attending a small animal hospital were asked to complete a survey assessing their understanding of commonly used veterinary terms and phrases, either online or in paper format. Scores were used to identify areas requiring improvement and investigate the effect of demographic characteristics on owner understanding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 378 completed questionnaires was received. Over 97% of owners rated the quality of veterinary communication as good or moderate to good. However, approximately one-fifth believed that communication could be improved. While veterinary terms and phrases were broadly understood, none was correctly interpreted by all respondents, and common misconceptions were identified. Respondents with prior medical knowledge scored higher.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The survey methodology allows for misinterpretation of questions, response bias and non-compliance with the requirement that respondents do not receive help in completing the survey from external sources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While pet owners generally perceived veterinary communication to be good, some commonly used terms and phrases were frequently misinterpreted. Vets should therefore be encouraged to use lay terms when communicating with clients and to take time to confirm that their intended message has been fully understood.</p>","PeriodicalId":23560,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Record","volume":" ","pages":"e5163"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Record","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.5163","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Veterinary communication plays a key role in client satisfaction, patient outcomes and clinician wellbeing. Communication assessment tools can help to facilitate improvement strategies.

Methods: Over a 5-month period, pet owners attending a small animal hospital were asked to complete a survey assessing their understanding of commonly used veterinary terms and phrases, either online or in paper format. Scores were used to identify areas requiring improvement and investigate the effect of demographic characteristics on owner understanding.

Results: A total of 378 completed questionnaires was received. Over 97% of owners rated the quality of veterinary communication as good or moderate to good. However, approximately one-fifth believed that communication could be improved. While veterinary terms and phrases were broadly understood, none was correctly interpreted by all respondents, and common misconceptions were identified. Respondents with prior medical knowledge scored higher.

Limitations: The survey methodology allows for misinterpretation of questions, response bias and non-compliance with the requirement that respondents do not receive help in completing the survey from external sources.

Conclusion: While pet owners generally perceived veterinary communication to be good, some commonly used terms and phrases were frequently misinterpreted. Vets should therefore be encouraged to use lay terms when communicating with clients and to take time to confirm that their intended message has been fully understood.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Record
Veterinary Record 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Record (branded as Vet Record) is the official journal of the British Veterinary Association (BVA) and has been published weekly since 1888. It contains news, opinion, letters, scientific reviews and original research papers and communications on a wide range of veterinary topics, along with disease surveillance reports, obituaries, careers information, business and innovation news and summaries of research papers in other journals. It is published on behalf of the BVA by BMJ Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信