Impact of different types of physical exercise on sleep quality in older population with insomnia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Pakwan Bahalayothin, Kittiphon Nagaviroj, Thunyarat Anothaisintawee
{"title":"Impact of different types of physical exercise on sleep quality in older population with insomnia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Pakwan Bahalayothin, Kittiphon Nagaviroj, Thunyarat Anothaisintawee","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2024-003056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure the impact of each type of exercise on sleep quality and identify the exercise that enhances sleep quality the most.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Eligible randomised controlled trials that compare physical exercise to routine activities, usual care, non-physical activity, or health education to measure the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>Studies retrieved from Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, ClinicalTrial.gov and ThaiJo from the database's inception to October 2022.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Two reviewers independently identified studies, collected data and assessed bias. In the absence of heterogeneity, a fixed effect model was used for pairwise meta-analysis. Alternatively, a random effect model was used. A two-stage network meta-analysis used the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to compare exercise efficacy.</p><p><strong>Main outcome: </strong>Global Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (GPSQI) and subdomain score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review comprised 2170 people from 25 trials. Direct meta-analysis revealed significant improvement in GPSQI with combined exercise (unstandardised mean difference (USMD) -2.35, 95% CI-3.13 to -1.57, p<0.001, I<sup>2</sup>=69.13%). GPSQI decreased considerably with aerobic activity (USMD -4.36, 95% CI -7.86 to -0.86, p=0.01, I<sup>2</sup>=97.83%). For the network meta-analysis, strengthening, aerobic and combination exercise significantly lowered GPSQI (USMD-5.75, -3.76 and -2.54, respectively). Strength training improved GPSQI scores most effectively (SUCRA 94.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exercise that strengthens muscles, rather than aerobic or combination exercises, is the most effective way to enhance sleep quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11891529/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2024-003056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To measure the impact of each type of exercise on sleep quality and identify the exercise that enhances sleep quality the most.

Study selection: Eligible randomised controlled trials that compare physical exercise to routine activities, usual care, non-physical activity, or health education to measure the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.

Data source: Studies retrieved from Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, ClinicalTrial.gov and ThaiJo from the database's inception to October 2022.

Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers independently identified studies, collected data and assessed bias. In the absence of heterogeneity, a fixed effect model was used for pairwise meta-analysis. Alternatively, a random effect model was used. A two-stage network meta-analysis used the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to compare exercise efficacy.

Main outcome: Global Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (GPSQI) and subdomain score.

Results: This review comprised 2170 people from 25 trials. Direct meta-analysis revealed significant improvement in GPSQI with combined exercise (unstandardised mean difference (USMD) -2.35, 95% CI-3.13 to -1.57, p<0.001, I2=69.13%). GPSQI decreased considerably with aerobic activity (USMD -4.36, 95% CI -7.86 to -0.86, p=0.01, I2=97.83%). For the network meta-analysis, strengthening, aerobic and combination exercise significantly lowered GPSQI (USMD-5.75, -3.76 and -2.54, respectively). Strength training improved GPSQI scores most effectively (SUCRA 94.6%).

Conclusion: Exercise that strengthens muscles, rather than aerobic or combination exercises, is the most effective way to enhance sleep quality.

不同类型的体育锻炼对老年失眠症患者睡眠质量的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和网络荟萃分析
目的:测量各类运动对睡眠质量的影响,确定最能提高睡眠质量的运动。研究选择:符合条件的随机对照试验,将体育锻炼与日常活动、常规护理、非体育活动或健康教育进行比较,以测量匹兹堡睡眠质量指数。数据来源:检索自Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, ClinicalTrial.gov和ThaiJo从数据库建立到2022年10月的研究。数据提取和综合:两名审稿人独立确定研究,收集数据并评估偏倚。在不存在异质性的情况下,采用固定效应模型进行两两荟萃分析。或者,使用随机效应模型。两阶段网络荟萃分析使用累积排名曲线下的表面(SUCRA)来比较运动效果。主要观察指标:全球匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(GPSQI)和子域评分。结果:本综述包括来自25项试验的2170人。直接荟萃分析显示,联合运动显著改善GPSQI(非标准化平均差值(USMD) -2.35, 95% CI-3.13至-1.57,p2=69.13%)。GPSQI随有氧运动显著下降(USMD为-4.36,95% CI为-7.86 ~ -0.86,p=0.01, I2=97.83%)。在网络meta分析中,强化、有氧和组合运动显著降低GPSQI (USMD-5.75、-3.76和-2.54)。力量训练对GPSQI评分的改善最为有效(SUCRA为94.6%)。结论:增强肌肉的运动,而不是有氧运动或组合运动,是提高睡眠质量最有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine and Community Health (FMCH) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the topics of family medicine, general practice and community health. FMCH strives to be a leading international journal that promotes ‘Health Care for All’ through disseminating novel knowledge and best practices in primary care, family medicine, and community health. FMCH publishes original research, review, methodology, commentary, reflection, and case-study from the lens of population health. FMCH’s Asian Focus section features reports of family medicine development in the Asia-pacific region. FMCH aims to be an exemplary forum for the timely communication of medical knowledge and skills with the goal of promoting improved health care through the practice of family and community-based medicine globally. FMCH aims to serve a diverse audience including researchers, educators, policymakers and leaders of family medicine and community health. We also aim to provide content relevant for researchers working on population health, epidemiology, public policy, disease control and management, preventative medicine and disease burden. FMCH does not impose any article processing charges (APC) or submission charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信